Some say it’s wrong to let children work, but I say we don’t have the right to criticize nations that rely on the fruits of child labor. After all: Children need to eat, too. I much rather have child labor than child poverty.

When I was a young girl of 16 years I had a newspaper route and nobody was crying for me, so what is the big deal now? Fact is that most children today are just plain spoiled.

I also have a hard time to see what is wrong with child prostitution over there in them 3rd world countries. It’s not my cup of tea and if my daughter ever decides to open her legs for money I wolf beat her to death, but let’s face it: Foreign girls are sluts anyway and his might be the only way they can make a living. Who are we to say they are not allowed? If they choose that Career path, obviously they are old enough to do it. Jesus don’t like it but they are going to he’ll anyway, so I don’t care.

Thanks for reading,
Shelley

Uncoached and Unedited: without any prompting of any kind, these kids give O’Bombaclot a real what-for, saying it straight and from the heart. Can you believe people are writing in to FOX News and YouTube asking that this video be taken down? Liberal censorship at it’s worst, just shameful.

Liberals keep trying to make it seem as if the children in this video were being told what to say. Frankly they don’t seem to have any signs of physical violence or burn marks on them, what would make liberals think that they’re being tortured into speaking in front of the camera is beyond me. Most of the kids seem perfectly happy, as usual liberals can’t stand happiness, especially when the typical liberal family consists of a man, married to another man, and a couple of parakeets.

Louis Theroux Smear-Job: in this great clip, Louis Theroux tries to do a smear-job against our friends at Westboro Baptist Church, attempting to make it seem like the children don’t know what’s going on. Well guess what, they do!

We need to get together and make sure FOX News keeps this YouTube clip up. It’s a great thing when people this young get politically involved. So make sure you write to FOX News and YouTube and tell them you want to keep this video available. These kids are just saying it like it is!

Always Right,
Chuck Roast

Failed presidential candidate John Kerry has revealed his sinister plan to turn America gay: He wants to allow the homos to give blood. Please take a moment to read this sobering and informative article World Net Daily, probably the most important news website in the whole of America.

How can you tell these gay blood cells from normal ones? Simple, they have a slightly pinkish tinge which betrays their former owners low moral standards. Christian blood by comparison is of the deepest red, like that which Christ bled while suffering on the cross.

We all know that gay blood is filled with AIDS and other diseases that Jesus sent to to the world to punish the homos, but what few people understand is that the gay blood also contains sinfulness. That blood has been tainted by the sin of lustful thoughts and actions. If you are unfortunate enough to have that sinner’s blood transfused into you then you will be part sinner. You can try to pray the gay away, for some it works but for many it does not. That is why we cannot possibly allow homosexuals to mingle their dirty blood into our life-giving supplies.

The only known cure for gay-blood is the blood of Christ, which as you can see is a completely different colour. If you suspect that you may have been made gay by receiving homo-blood then you ha better pray that your sins be washed away in the blood of Christ.

Has John Kerry thought this through? His proposal does not even include the most rudimentary labelling. For example there would be no way of knowing whether the blood a doctor is about to put into a child’s innocent body is from a godly individual or a human cess-pool. I’d rather see my child bleed to death than risk have him become gay because of exposure to the corrupt blood of sinners.

Yours in Christ,

Jimmy Goddard

Joe Jonas – End the R-word; one of the phoney ‘band’ members from the so-called ‘band’ Jonas Brothers, Joe Jonas is a would-be Christian who tries to undermine the english language by trying to stop the use of the word ‘retarded’ in regular conversation. Well on behalf of all real Christians let me tell you Joe Jonas – you’re a retrard if you think your ‘R-word’ campaign will ever work!

The history of the United States shows that there are many great words that are useful and practical. Calling people gooks, chinks, negroes, wops and other descriptive terms have helped make America what it is today. If we stopped calling people ‘retarded’ what would happen next, that we can’t say it’s ‘warm’ outside? No more calling Linux ‘communist’ or union organizers ‘lazy’? As Christians understand better than anyone language needs to be unfettered to say in an open and honest way the truth: a person who is overweight is a ‘fat pig’, a sports team that cannot win a game is easily identified as a ‘bunch of losers’, and a woman you ask out on a date who rejects you is a ‘dirty whore’, all perfectly good words and acceptable to say. This is a dangerous direction that America is heading in when the populist masses start dictating culture and vocabulary. Just look at how cryptic and seditious text messages by the younger generation have become, only an al-Queada sympathizer could even read those.

Virginia GOP Lawmaker Bob Marshall:“The number of children who are born subsequent to a first abortion with handicaps has increased dramatically. Why? Because when you abort the first born of any, nature takes its vengeance on the subsequent children. In the Old Testament, the first born of every being, animal and man, was dedicated to the Lord. There’s a special punishment, Christians would suggest.”

Women’s rights and scripture-trained Christian abortion expert Virginia GOP Lawmaker Bob Marshall says it straight-up and no-nonsense what the Bible says about people with disabilities like mental retardation. Simply put it’s God’s Will it happened, and it’s Jesus’s way of saying if women keep having abortions and other terrible things, then their children will suffer the consequences of mental disabilities. Bob’s honest biblical research into the retardation problem has gotten a lot of liberals upset. But the facts are simple, if it’s in the bible then it’s the truth and that’s just the way it goes. Something real Christians like Bob Marshall understand better than anyone else. Folks, let’s just put an end to this ‘R-word’ nonsense right here and now: calling people retarded is acceptable and even funny, just like calling people morons and negroes is. Now go out there and let’s make this happen, and God Bless you all.

Always Right,
Charles Roast

Once again we have fought and won the battle to keep Christ’s Holy name sacred on the day that he personally anointed as sacred to HIM. That’s 2009 victories in a row – you’d think that the atheists, heathens, commies, pagans, homos and drug-fiends would give up given their loosing streak, but no.

The vast left-wing conspiracy to end Christmas was fought more bitterly than any year I can ever remember, and believe it or not this year was a close call.

Our good friend Rep Henry Brown wrote:

“As a Christian, I feel it is also important that I have the right to celebrate Christmas and observe its significance as a national holiday and I strongly believe that wishing someone ‘merry Christmas’ should never be met with disapproval.”

And he’s right: I’ve lost count of the number of Christians who have been threatened Obama’s black-shirts simply for wishing a fellow patriot “Merry Christmas”.

This year Americans faced ever more oppressive secularism encroaching into our most holy festivity. Every time a store clerk wishes you “Happy Holidays” it’s another victory for the liberal “social inclusion” agenda which wants to make Homosexuality into the same thing as Heterosexuality. Anybody who says Holidays in Christmas wants to turn you gay.

We have inside information which proves beyond any doubt that President Obama was on the verge of issuing an executive order which would effectively cancel Christmas!

According to our inside sources, the President would replace our sacred day with two new holidays, the Muslim month of “Ramadan” and an entirely new Voodoo festival which would involve ritually killing a goat.

Thankfully, leading Republicans such as Sarah Palin, Bill O’Reilley and Shelley Goodman mobilized a prayer vigil which called upon Jesus to protect us for another twelve-month. The power of the LORD stayed the Presidential usurper’s hands which means that for one more year Christmas is safe for your kids.

Yours in Christ,

Jimmy Goddard

Dear Lord,

The American Holocaust is still going on. Abortion is still legal in America. We pray in Jesus’ name that you will find it in your heart to forgive us, O’Lord.

Real American are fighting every day to stop abortion but liberals go on killing your creation every day.

50 Million (50,000,000) Americans have been killed so far.

Please forgive them because they are blinded by liberal hatred against life. Please support us in our war against the American Holocaust.

Amen

Facts about Late Term Abortion

• Late term abortions are legal in most states. “Late Term” means that an abortion can be done up to the moment of birth. This means that a birth is being induced and in the act of birth the baby is being killed.
• Some late term abortions are being done by putting a salt-acid mixture into the baby’s lungs so that the child suffocates.
• In case of a failed late term abortions, means that if the child is BORN ALIVE, the “doctor” will often kill the crying (LIVING) baby. The act of killing is often been done by drowning the struggling child in a bowl of water. Sometimes the baby will be just strangled to death or it’s head is being cut off.
• The remains of the child will be thrown in the trash or the corps will be used for medical testings.

• INFANTICIDE – The following issues have been raised in order to get you to think more critically about infanticide and why infanticide would be an acceptable form of family planning among the majority of pre-industrial societies. It is normal for people in one society to judge the behavior of people in other societies in terms of the moral values of their own society. This is, in fact, the very definition of ethnocentrism. However, many issues can be raised regarding a variety of methods of family planning that place the practice of infanticide within a broader anthropological perspective.

• Most Americans would consider infanticide to be morally wrong. However, infanticide is widely practiced throughout the world. Is infanticide necessarily immoral and, if so, is it universally wrong? By what criteria do we make that determination, and do those criteria distinguish unambiguously between abortion, which is legal in our society, and infanticide which is not, but which is accepted and practiced in other societies?
• Abortion is legal and is accepted by the majority of the American population as morally correct. Why is abortion an acceptable method of family planning in the U.S., but not infanticide? To what extent are we, by accepting abortion and rejecting infanticide, defining one method of terminating a human life as morally acceptable while condemning another form as morally unacceptable? If infanticide is practiced by peoples who do not have access to abortion technology, can they be considered morally wrong for terminating a human life by the best means they have available to them while accepting our method of terminating a life because we possess the technological means to end that life before birth?
• How does the fact that our own society’s stand on both the legality and morality of abortion has changed radically in the past 30 years affect our certainty regarding the immorality of infanticide? Isn’t it quite possible that future generations may come to accept infanticide as a reasonable method of family planning, just as we now accept abortion and increasingly accept euthanasia and doctor-assisted suicide –practices which would have resulted in a doctor’s losing his or her license to practice medicine a mere 10 years ago?
• Steven Pinker, in his article, “Why They Kill Their Newborns”, distinguishes between neonaticide and the killing of older children (filicide). He shows that, while our own society condemns infanticide, we are, in fact, quite tolerant of those who kill newly born children. He reports that of nearly 300 women charged with neonaticide in the U.S., not one spent more than a night in jail. The general population was much more willing to deal leniently, for example, with the Grossberg-Peterson case involving the killing of a newborn than they were with the case of Susan Smith, who killed her two sons: one 14 months old, and the other 3 year old.
• Our notion that infanticide is committed by disturbed individuals is also not supported by research. First of all, women who practice neonaticide generally go on to become loving supportive mothers when they do have and raise children (as do mothers who have had abortions), in contrast to those women who kill older children. Secondly, as Pinker states, “it’s hard to maintain that neonaticide is an illness when we learn that it has been practiced and accepted in most cultures throughout history.” That many societies practice infanticide is clearly illustrated by the articles in the Infanticide packet.
• The acceptance of abortion but not infanticide in the U.S. has been justified on the grounds that a baby is alive while a fetus is not. When does a human life begin? How do we define life? In the article referred to above, Steven Pinker discusses how difficult it is to determine when a human organism becomes a person with a right to life. Conception, birth, the end of the second trimester are all rather arbitrary definition points for when a human organism becomes a person. Viability is also problematic, given that the human infant cannot survive on its own for several years after its birth and that many infants cannot survive at all without medical intervention, to say nothing of large numbers of the elderly. Furthermore, infant viability is a matter of degree and is clearly much less developed in humans than in most other mammals. Given the difficulty of establishing clear objective criteria for when personhood is achieved –in some societies “personhood” is not conferred until well after birth– on what grounds do we claim that one point in the human organism’s development is more valid and objective (i.e., less arbitrary) for establishing “personhood” and, thus, a right to life than any other point? If the definition of “personhood” is largely socially determined, to what extent is the criteria used for defining “personhood” in our own society any more objective and valid than that used in other societies? How does the controversy over when an abortion is acceptably performed in the U.S. affect our understanding of the social basis of our society’s definition of when life begins? What factors determine who is likely to accept Pinker’s definition and who is likely to reject it? How does their stand on the issue reflect their personal interests rather than an objective scientific look at the issue? Furthermore, when we set arbitrary boundaries as our defining points for the beginning of life, to what extent do we inadvertently kill human organisms that develop more quickly than the established norm? Finally, why is “personhood” used to determine when a human organism is alive rather than some less subjective critria? If we don’t use “doghood” or “cathood” to determine when dogs and cats are alive, are we being logically inconsistent to use “personhood” to determine when humans are alive? Is there a uniform, objective biological definition for the beginning of life that can be applied systematically to all living organisms, including dogs, cats and humans?
• Most biology textbooks define life as possessing the following characteristics: Cells, energy, heredity, reproduction and responsiveness to the environment. All living things are composed of cells. Even such microscopic unicellular organisms as bacteria are considered alive. All living things also acquire and use energy to maintain metabolism. All living organisms also possess DNA organized into genes and chromosomes which form the blueprint for how that organism will develop and grow. Similarly, all living organisms are potentially capable of reproduction. Being able to reproduce offspring which share their genetic material, living organisms (unlike non-living matter) are able to cause the transfer of genetic information from one generation to the next. Finally, living organisms are responsive to their environments. That is, they are affected by their environments and attempt to adapt to those environments. Are these characteristics, which are presented as distinguishing living organisms in nearly every biology textbook written, less applicable to a fetus than to a baby or a young child, to an invalid or an octogenarian, or for that matter to any human being? (Would they also apply to both the sperm and the unfertilized egg? The Roman Catholic Church maintains that they do, which is why it opposed artificial birth control.) If so, then on what logical or scientific grounds is it determined that a baby or a child is alive but not a fetus? What does this say about our society’s support of abortion but not infanticide? Is it logically consistent? And if it is not, then why is it so widely accepted?

  The definition of when life begins has changed radically in the U.S. during the past 40 years. To what extent has the definition of when life begins changed because newer definitions serve the changing interests of the individuals or political groups doing the defining? To what extent is the changing definition of life and the recourse to such concepts as “personhood” a function of the pivotal role that the abortion issue plays in American politics? Proponents of abortion in the U.S. refer to abortion as a “right” and challenge any qualification on a woman’s “right to choose”. Any factor that threatens that “right” is vigorously opposed, including mandatory waiting periods and parental notification laws. To what extent might the application of an objective interspecies definition of life to humans in general and to fetuses in particular, also be perceived as a threat by those who want to promote abortion as their “right”? A recent article in The Economist titled “The War That Never Ends” (June 13, 2003) examined the abortion issue in the U.S. at the 25th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade. The article distinguished between the continuing controversy over abortion in the U.S. and its general acceptance in Europe, including in such predominantly Roman Catholic countries as France, Spain and Italy. The article viewed the problem this way.

Dear Parents of America,
if you are a German immigrant your child is probably watching and owning all of the “Maximum Perversum” videos available in Germ-land. I don’t think anything is gonna change that, because you don’t believe in God, you don’t have any values and your goal is that your children are becoming just as rotten as you are.
BUT, if you are a true American, please make sure your child does not watch any filth on TV. ABC, CBS and NBC are nothing more than hardcore porn stations these days. I don’t think there is anything wrong with your child watching a good action movie or war movie, but for Christ sake, try to keep your child’s mind pure and don’t let your breed watch porn.
The images below should give you some idea of what to look for at the local book story, the library, the video store and just generally when selecting TV or internet content that is valuable for the upbringing of your child. I selected these items not only for their educational value but also for bringing the fear of God closer to your child.

Thanks for reading folks.
All the best and good luck making your child a God-Warrior!

Shelley N. Goodman

Did you ever notice that almost all companies selling sweets, especially lollipops are firmly in lie-beral hands? Chupa Chups the world leading producer of “sucking candy” is supporting the democrat party with huge donations, every year. Why you ask? Because lie-berals have a strong tendency to child-sex and therefore one of their main objective is the conditioning of young girls to perform oral sex and/or to advance the skills of those already performing oral sex for their own perverse satisfaction. Lieberals and homosexuals have teamed up to corrupt your youth.

The act of sucking is quite instinctive and natural. Toddlers suck at their mothers nipples in order to satisfy their hunger. In later years the child might suck his/her thumb in order to re-create the sense of absolute security at their mother’s breast. Later again disgusting, perverse lieberals are using this urge to suck to pressure their girlfriends, wives or daughters to perform oral sex by sucking their penis. This sickening fact is one more reason for the need of martial law and the ensuing capturing and locking up of lieberals and homosexuals.

We have to look back at the good old times when Jesus walked through America, bringing His message of hope and prosperity. Did Jesus have oral sex? NO, and neither should you.

Folks, please don’t allow your child to suck lollipops! Please don’t let lieberal policy corrupt your child’s mind. Thanks for reading through this article, dealing with this terrible controversial issue. I appreciate your loyal readership.

All the best. Your friend and Republican leader,
Shelley N. Goodman

A new liberal drug craze called “Jenkum” is sweeping our nation – it’s a dangerous new drug and one ‘huff’ of it can kill or send the user completely insane – but thanks to liberal congressional stonewalling this drug is completely legal and your kids could be using it at school – we need to do something about it

Its effects last for around an hour and consist of auditory and visual hallucinations. A fifth-grader in Lusaka said of Jenkem to an WorldNetDaily reporter: “Old man, this is more potent than cannabis.”

Is your kid on the Jenk? A 16-year-old boy described his preference for jenkem over other inhalants, “With glue, I just hear voices in my head. But with Jenkem, I see visions. I see my mother who is dead and I forget about the problems in my life.”

Jenkem is made from fermented human sewage: A quantity of the substance is placed in a bottle and the fermentation-gasses are captured in a baloon. After two or three weeks of ‘resting’, the baloon can be tied-off and the collected jenkem-gas can be used to ‘get high’.

Our friends at the Crollier county Sherrif’s office issued this urgent warning about Jenkem abuse in Florida’s schools. Please download this, print it and circulate it to your school and any parents at your church. We must all be aware of the Jenkem menace. [Click on the image for a high-res version]

Like Jazz music, AIDS and heroin Jenkum has it’s origin in darkest Africa. This low-cost ‘high’ became the drug of choice for poor african street-kids. Owing to lax clinton-era immigration policies, many of these Jenkem addicts moved to America to live on benefits. They brought their disgusting habit with them:

Before long the craze spread to America’s African community where “loons” of “winnie” or “butwash” are exchanged for hard-cash or stolen car-stereos in covert Jenkem clubs. It’s not just African Americans: White kids whose minds have been poisoned by secular culture have been pressued into giving it a try – only they can know the true hell of a jenkum addiction.

Is Barack Obmama a “Jenkie”? We asked his campaign team if he had ever used the substance, however his team refused to comment. Obama’s refusal to comment on Larry Sinclair’s drug use allegations suggest that Barack Hussein Obama might only have been snorting crack to drive away the stench of huffing Jenkem during his homosexual encounter with Mr. Sinclair.

What are we to do? It’s time to unite and drive out this Jenkem menace from our schools, churches and towns. Please take a moment this week to teach your children about the dangers of huffing Jenkem. If you homeschool, I suggest you print out the warning leaflet above and discuss the dangers of addiction with your kids. Responsible Christian parenting will save your kids from this awful addiction.

Jimmy

Former champ wrestler “Captain” Lou Albano still makes a living by providing the voice of Nintendo’s Mario. Only the crazy Japanese could have been inspired to make a game from Lou’s crazy ideas!

Nintendo must be running out of ideas because this years’s over-hyped game is a return to Lou Albano’s psychedelic drug-fueled ?World of Mario?.

Nintendo have chosen this mediocre game as the subject of a multi million dollar advertising campaign. They intend to promote their red-capped plumber to a new generation of kids, but is that going to be enough to tempt kids away from Madden and some of the season’s excellent sporting titles.Super Mario Galaxy for Nintendo’s budget-price Wii console is basically a re-hashing of their 1991 ?classic? Super Mario Sunshine, in fact astute readers will notice that it shares exactly the same plot!

This is hardly likely to be a problem for Nintendo because almost nobody who has played the previous generation of Mario’s antics will be young enough to consider buying this ‘re-booted’ Mario.

As with all of Mario’s games, the story is simple and largely irrelevant to the action: Mario’s girlfriend ?Princess Peach? has been once-again kidnapped by ?Bowser?, a satanic, spiked dragon-like demon. Rather than inform the relevant authorities, Mr Mario sets out as a sort of vigilante in order to rescue his beloved.

In order to rescue Peach the red-capped plumber has to collect satanic pentagrams, mis-translated as ?power-stars? with which Mario intends to increase his own demonic power to rival Bowser’s. These pentagrams are scattered around a number of ?galaxies? through which Mario must battle his way in order to retrieve. Pentagrams are rewarded for taking risks, performing stunts or acts of aggression

Troubling: Pentagrams like these are the object of Mario’s quest. The Japanise occultists who provided the inspiration for Mario’s galaxy clearly believed that kids would be more likely to believe in it if they made the occult symbols cute.

Mario is an excessively violent game: Mario must defeat a series of enemies by slamming into them, attacking them with a hammer, incinerating them or by jumping on their heads. I hate to think what might happen if impressionable liberal teens try to imitate Mario’s preposterous acrobatics. A game this violent should certainly come with stern disclaimers.

I downloaded this image from a teen Mario fan’s web-site. “Powned” is hacker slang for “murdered”. The child is throwing a red igloo and an unidentified device at the girl – an all too familiar picture of liberal on liberal game-related violence. Anybody who thinks that video games do not encourage violence should look at this image and think hard.

The bad news does not end there: Assisting Mario and his brother Wario is a cohort of drug-peddling ?Lumas? – star like beings who provide Mario with magic-mushroom like power-ups which in typical RPG style enhance his fighting ability.

The most valuable commodity the Lumas sell are ?star-bits? – the World of Mario equivalent of crack-cocaine. In my extensive play-testing of this game I counted over sixty overt references to drug-taking or drug culture. Do you really want your kids indoctrinated into the culture of instant gratification?Could it get any worse you ask? How about the occult? In one particularly horrific level Mario is forced to transform himself into a phantom. In this guise Mario can commune with other evil spirits, something that is expressly forbidden according to God’s law. What are Nintendo trying to tell us? That demonology is good, or that kids should study the occult as a means to grow more powerful? This is the unfortunate message that kids will take from Super Mario’s game.

Bottom line: Super Mario galaxy is a game that will most likely appeal to pre-teens and color-blind imbeciles. Younger players will not notice it’s absurd and wildly inconsistent plot. Adults (with the exception of nappy-fetishists) will find it’s childish style off-putting.

Parenting Advice: ShelleyTheRepublican recommends that families avoid this game on account of in the unlikely case that your local suppliers decide to stock it. As an alternative you should consider the excellent ?Left Behind: Eternal Forces?, which is a 100% Christian game which unlike Mario teaches essential life-skills which will be of value if your child is unfortunately not raptured.

Jimmy Goddard

Q:? How many pollacks does it take to defend America from radical students that would only go on to destroy it by giving aid and comfort to the enemy?

A:? One!? And his name is Ben Nowakowski.

Some say that the south side of Chicago is the baddest part of town but they ain’t never been to Berwyn and that’s to the west.? Judging by the America-hating students of Morton West High School you might as well be sitting in a cave with Osama bin Laden.?

On November 6th a junior al Qaeda cell staged a pro-terrorist “protest” in the halls of a government school disrupting classes and bringing what little education happens there to almost nothing.? Now, in Cambridge, MA and Bezerkly, CA that’s a typical day.

A typical class schedule for Cambridge Public Schools

In a regular government school the teachers, principals and the superintendent wouldn’t want to offend students bent on destroying America so they’d just let the “kids be kids” and go back to showing whatever kids was left how use condoms and write haikus.

This haiku “art” project done by a fifth grader at Fidel Castro
Elementry school in Cambridge received a “B” only because
it did not wish death upon President Bush.

But sometimes a true American slips through the hiring process and this time he was a pollack!? Ben Nowakowski cares about education and he had a plan to regain control over the wild west town that’d sprung up in one of his schools.? First, he told the kids that if they’d kindly move their “protest”.? Instead of obeying authority, they linked arms and started chanting what sounded to some like “Allahu Akbar”.? That’s when Superintendent Nowakowski locked down the classes to protect the other students from a possible homicide bomb attempt.

Skinheads and cross-dressing America haters make up
the bulk of junior al Qaeda cell members.

Then he got smart.? He promised the students that if they moved the “protest” they wouldn’t get suspended or kicked out of school and they just get detention for cutting classes.? The students agreed and moved outside.

Then he suspended them! And he’s thinking of kicking them out of school!?

An artist’s rendition of Superintendent Ben Nowakowski
kicking future suspected terrorists out of school

Take that, bin Laden!

Back when America was a moral place to live and there were no mosques, when a?teacher kicked your child out of school then the parent backed it up with a couple of kicks of their own the child walked in the door.? Today, though, with dead pre-borns littering the streets, hardcore pornography on prime-time television and God kicked out of our schools parents would rather spare the rod, call the ACLU and spoil the child.? And even worse, they’re planning on protesting the school themselves!

It’s not clear exactly what kind of protest the parents
of the Osama bin Laden Fan Club would stage.? It might be
anything from standing naked outside the school to a
full scale homicide bombing.

One thing is clear, though – with Ben Nowakowski as the Superintendent, there’s one school in America that ain’t going down without at fight!

.

Child sex is wrong but is sex the same as abuse? I don’t know anybody that condones child-abuse. I don’t know anybody who would shake the hand of a child abuser, and I know many that are not shy of throwing the first stone as soon as they have the chance to do so. I know many that don’t bother looking beyond the first impression. Who’s fault is it? Who allowed it to happen? Who was the perpatrator and who will continue to be the victim? Most children are innocent. Most children have a beautiful mind, not preoccupied with money, greed and prejudices. Most of us believe that the mind of a child is lilly-white and squeaky-clean. Like I said, most children’s minds but not all children’s minds.

There are always the ones following their dirty little agenda. The young girls that show a little too much of their young and flawless skin, the young girls that move a little too slowly hiding their hairless genitals when daddy walks into the bathroom by mistake.

The liberal media tells us that young girls are desirable, God tells us that following the impulse is wrong, the law makes sure that we suffer if we disobey God.

I want to thank my friends Billy Bob, Barbara, Tristan, Sam and Shelley for all their support. A special thanks goes to Shelley for letting me tell the story of my life on this blog. A huge thank you to Shelley’s good-looking daughter Lisa for helping me write this article. Html is a filthy bitch.

Once more it became very clear that only Republicans are willing to look for the whole truth, to find the story behind the story. Republicans have a deep dedication to honor and justice. Where liberals scream and whine and point fingers there is no way justice can prevail. Only Republicans have a commitment to truth, justice and the American way deep enough to reveal the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

God bless America.
Sully Peterson

Picture sources: 1. Random House Books / 2. Lee Jeans / 3. VisualPink / 4&5. Trixieteen

It cannot be re-iterated frequently enough – Crosstalk America is the finest Christian radio show currently broadcasting.? The board mandated some years ago that Crosstalk was required listening and that spot questioning would take place to strictly enforce this policy. ? That I recall, only two or our hundreds of volunteers failed their quizzes.? On both occasions, they pleaded not to be let go claiming that the board was quibbling over “semantics”.? Bluntly, people who use words such as “semantics” to defend themselves have no place at Shelley The Republican.? Also, as I ponder the events, it occurs to me that both converted to Christianity.? There may be a lesson there.

But that is not the point.

On 8/15/07, Mr. Eliason interviewed Matt Trewhella, the founder of Missionaries To The Preborn.? If you have?never heard Pastor Trewhella speak then I cannot recommend that you listen to this show strongly enough.? I defy any person with a soul to come away from this program and continue their mindless and disgusting support of the slaughter of pre-born children.

One can walk through one’s life with the assumptions one holds blithely unaware that a subtle shift in one’s thinking might net a new and powerful idea.? One can never know where such a wind may blow from.? This is one of the gifts God bestows upon those who faithfully read STR and why I consider it an honor to include myself among those whom God guided to aid Shelley Goodman.? The staff of STR constantly strives to examine a problem from every side, divorcing themselves from prejudice and, thereby, allowing God to work through them.? I bring this up to explain how listening to Pastor Trewhella allowed me to open myself fully to God and find a new way to help raise awareness of child pornography.

After Mr. Eliason opened the show to telephone calls from listeners, a gentleman called up to inquire as to how Pastor Trewhella dealt with the childish furor of the pro-baby killer set to the large-format posters graphically depicting the helpless mangled corpses of innocent children dismembered at the bequest of selfish, whorish women who care more about attending rock concerts than human life.? The gentlemen also mentioned that these ghouls frequently whined about the effect such images could produce on small children.?

The following recounting of Pastor Trewhella’s response is here paraphrased

I don’t have any problem with children seeing these signs.? In fact, they need to see them.? I have eleven kids and when they get to be about three years old my wife and I show them pictures of babies cut into pieces by abortionists.? Their first question is – “What happened to the baby?”? You see, they recognize that poor murdered pre-born not as a mass of tissue for what it is – a child.? We explain in an age appropriate way that there are bad and evil men that kill innocent pre-born child, robbing them of the chance to serve God.? Those pre-borns make it into our family prayers at night.? Like I said, I’ve got eleven children and I don’t see any psychological damage done to any of them.

No psychological damage!? Put that in Freud’s pipe and “smoke it”!? He then continues.

As to the others, let me tell you a story that was told to me.? When the Americans liberated the death camps in Germany, they took every man, women and child to see the horrors done in the name of Hitler.? They said they took the men and women to show them the effect of their complacency.? And they showed the children the carnage so that it would never happen again.? This is the reason that people need to see these disturbing images.? They need it shoved right in their face so that they can see for themselves just how horrible the slaughter of pre-borns is.

Praise Christ Jesus!?

I sat in my office chair weeping.? I am not ashamed to admit this.? Anyone with a soul who would not weep at such words will undoubtedly suffer the fires of Hell.? But in my mourning for the sons and daughters cut down before their first breath of the sweet air of God, a voice of comfort and love whispered inside me, “and what of those who live to suffer a Hell on earth?? What will you do for them?”

I instinctively understood the action God expected from me – to use Pastor Trewhella’s methods to end all child pornography.

To that end, the board of STR plans to launch a new front in the battle to save the souls of our most precious resource.? Our initiative will be called Terminate Eroticism Against Boys And Girls.? The plan, modelled after Missionaries to the Pre-born, is to display large-format posters depicting child pornography in all its venal sinfulness.? Our teams will conduct rallies at targeted sites (daycare centers, Catholic “churches”, Disney movies etc) to inform, educate and mobilize citizens to bring a complete and utter cessation to child pornography.? In addition, we are currently producing fully illustrated pamphlet for parents to share with their children ages 3 and up that explains in an appropriate way what child pornography is and how to avoid it by obeying your parents and the protection that God’s love affords them.

As always, any constructive suggestions that might occur to you will be gratefully considered.

We hope that you will be as excited about this as we are.

Newton Wilcox
Board of Directors
www.shelleytherepublican.com