STR † THE FREEDOM BLOG

.

Dear Lord,

The American Holocaust is still going on. Abortion is still legal in America. We pray in Jesus’ name that you will find it in your heart to forgive us, O’Lord.

Real American are fighting every day to stop abortion but liberals go on killing your creation every day.

50 Million (50,000,000) Americans have been killed so far.

Please forgive them because they are blinded by liberal hatred against life. Please support us in our war against the American Holocaust.

Amen

****************************************************

Facts about Late Term Abortion

• Late term abortions are legal in most states. “Late Term” means that an abortion can be done up to the moment of birth. This means that a birth is being induced and in the act of birth the baby is being killed.
• Some late term abortions are being done by putting a salt-acid mixture into the baby’s lungs so that the child suffocates.
• In case of a failed late term abortions, means that if the child is BORN ALIVE, the “doctor” will often kill the crying (LIVING) baby. The act of killing is often been done by drowning the struggling child in a bowl of water. Sometimes the baby will be just strangled to death or it’s head is being cut off.
• The remains of the child will be thrown in the trash or the corps will be used for medical testings.

• INFANTICIDE - The following issues have been raised in order to get you to think more critically about infanticide and why infanticide would be an acceptable form of family planning among the majority of pre-industrial societies. It is normal for people in one society to judge the behavior of people in other societies in terms of the moral values of their own society. This is, in fact, the very definition of ethnocentrism. However, many issues can be raised regarding a variety of methods of family planning that place the practice of infanticide within a broader anthropological perspective.

• Most Americans would consider infanticide to be morally wrong. However, infanticide is widely practiced throughout the world. Is infanticide necessarily immoral and, if so, is it universally wrong? By what criteria do we make that determination, and do those criteria distinguish unambiguously between abortion, which is legal in our society, and infanticide which is not, but which is accepted and practiced in other societies?
• Abortion is legal and is accepted by the majority of the American population as morally correct. Why is abortion an acceptable method of family planning in the U.S., but not infanticide? To what extent are we, by accepting abortion and rejecting infanticide, defining one method of terminating a human life as morally acceptable while condemning another form as morally unacceptable? If infanticide is practiced by peoples who do not have access to abortion technology, can they be considered morally wrong for terminating a human life by the best means they have available to them while accepting our method of terminating a life because we possess the technological means to end that life before birth?
• How does the fact that our own society’s stand on both the legality and morality of abortion has changed radically in the past 30 years affect our certainty regarding the immorality of infanticide? Isn’t it quite possible that future generations may come to accept infanticide as a reasonable method of family planning, just as we now accept abortion and increasingly accept euthanasia and doctor-assisted suicide –practices which would have resulted in a doctor’s losing his or her license to practice medicine a mere 10 years ago?
• Steven Pinker, in his article, “Why They Kill Their Newborns”, distinguishes between neonaticide and the killing of older children (filicide). He shows that, while our own society condemns infanticide, we are, in fact, quite tolerant of those who kill newly born children. He reports that of nearly 300 women charged with neonaticide in the U.S., not one spent more than a night in jail. The general population was much more willing to deal leniently, for example, with the Grossberg-Peterson case involving the killing of a newborn than they were with the case of Susan Smith, who killed her two sons: one 14 months old, and the other 3 year old.
• Our notion that infanticide is committed by disturbed individuals is also not supported by research. First of all, women who practice neonaticide generally go on to become loving supportive mothers when they do have and raise children (as do mothers who have had abortions), in contrast to those women who kill older children. Secondly, as Pinker states, “it’s hard to maintain that neonaticide is an illness when we learn that it has been practiced and accepted in most cultures throughout history.” That many societies practice infanticide is clearly illustrated by the articles in the Infanticide packet.
• The acceptance of abortion but not infanticide in the U.S. has been justified on the grounds that a baby is alive while a fetus is not. When does a human life begin? How do we define life? In the article referred to above, Steven Pinker discusses how difficult it is to determine when a human organism becomes a person with a right to life. Conception, birth, the end of the second trimester are all rather arbitrary definition points for when a human organism becomes a person. Viability is also problematic, given that the human infant cannot survive on its own for several years after its birth and that many infants cannot survive at all without medical intervention, to say nothing of large numbers of the elderly. Furthermore, infant viability is a matter of degree and is clearly much less developed in humans than in most other mammals. Given the difficulty of establishing clear objective criteria for when personhood is achieved –in some societies “personhood” is not conferred until well after birth– on what grounds do we claim that one point in the human organism’s development is more valid and objective (i.e., less arbitrary) for establishing “personhood” and, thus, a right to life than any other point? If the definition of “personhood” is largely socially determined, to what extent is the criteria used for defining “personhood” in our own society any more objective and valid than that used in other societies? How does the controversy over when an abortion is acceptably performed in the U.S. affect our understanding of the social basis of our society’s definition of when life begins? What factors determine who is likely to accept Pinker’s definition and who is likely to reject it? How does their stand on the issue reflect their personal interests rather than an objective scientific look at the issue? Furthermore, when we set arbitrary boundaries as our defining points for the beginning of life, to what extent do we inadvertently kill human organisms that develop more quickly than the established norm? Finally, why is “personhood” used to determine when a human organism is alive rather than some less subjective critria? If we don’t use “doghood” or “cathood” to determine when dogs and cats are alive, are we being logically inconsistent to use “personhood” to determine when humans are alive? Is there a uniform, objective biological definition for the beginning of life that can be applied systematically to all living organisms, including dogs, cats and humans?
• Most biology textbooks define life as possessing the following characteristics: Cells, energy, heredity, reproduction and responsiveness to the environment. All living things are composed of cells. Even such microscopic unicellular organisms as bacteria are considered alive. All living things also acquire and use energy to maintain metabolism. All living organisms also possess DNA organized into genes and chromosomes which form the blueprint for how that organism will develop and grow. Similarly, all living organisms are potentially capable of reproduction. Being able to reproduce offspring which share their genetic material, living organisms (unlike non-living matter) are able to cause the transfer of genetic information from one generation to the next. Finally, living organisms are responsive to their environments. That is, they are affected by their environments and attempt to adapt to those environments. Are these characteristics, which are presented as distinguishing living organisms in nearly every biology textbook written, less applicable to a fetus than to a baby or a young child, to an invalid or an octogenarian, or for that matter to any human being? (Would they also apply to both the sperm and the unfertilized egg? The Roman Catholic Church maintains that they do, which is why it opposed artificial birth control.) If so, then on what logical or scientific grounds is it determined that a baby or a child is alive but not a fetus? What does this say about our society’s support of abortion but not infanticide? Is it logically consistent? And if it is not, then why is it so widely accepted?

  The definition of when life begins has changed radically in the U.S. during the past 40 years. To what extent has the definition of when life begins changed because newer definitions serve the changing interests of the individuals or political groups doing the defining? To what extent is the changing definition of life and the recourse to such concepts as “personhood” a function of the pivotal role that the abortion issue plays in American politics? Proponents of abortion in the U.S. refer to abortion as a “right” and challenge any qualification on a woman’s “right to choose”. Any factor that threatens that “right” is vigorously opposed, including mandatory waiting periods and parental notification laws. To what extent might the application of an objective interspecies definition of life to humans in general and to fetuses in particular, also be perceived as a threat by those who want to promote abortion as their “right”? A recent article in The Economist titled “The War That Never Ends” (June 13, 2003) examined the abortion issue in the U.S. at the 25th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade. The article distinguished between the continuing controversy over abortion in the U.S. and its general acceptance in Europe, including in such predominantly Roman Catholic countries as France, Spain and Italy. The article viewed the problem this way.

The shocking truth about Late Term Abortions. This is what abortion “doctors” don’t tell you: A birth is induced, the struggling, crying baby is being ripped from the womb feet first, then a big needle is crushed into the baby’s skull from behind and the brain is being sucked out. The baby will be born dead. The American Holocaust is very well alive!

The battered and ripped apart corpse of an American Citizen. His rights violated, murdered and kicked in the trash. This dead child was found behind an Abortion Mill in St. Paul in 2002. Killed and put in the trash, it’s body still warm. This is what Barrack Obama stands for.

This could have been your brother, your son or your friend. He was killed by heartless liberals that don’t value life. He could have invented a cure for cancer or he could have composed a beautiful symphony. He is one of the 50 Million killed in the American Holocaust.

I am so very very sorry Lord.
Please forgive us.

14 comments

Dear God:
Please help parents all around America make the right decisions when it comes to child-care. We need to make sure that our children grow up to become strong and proud warriors. We will need to fight many wars in your name, for only a truly American world can ever be a free and peaceful world.
Please o’Lord, guide the parents of America in their pursuit to raise children that don’t question your authority and do what is your will and your will only.
Amen

=============

Dear Parents of America,
if you are a German immigrant your child is probably watching and owning all of the “Maximum Perversum” videos available in Germ-land. I don’t think anything is gonna change that, because you don’t believe in God, you don’t have any values and your goal is that your children are becoming just as rotten as you are.
BUT, if you are a true American, please make sure your child does not watch any filth on TV. ABC, CBS and NBC are nothing more than hardcore porn stations these days. I don’t think there is anything wrong with your child watching a good action movie or war movie, but for Christ sake, try to keep your child’s mind pure and don’t let your breed watch porn.
The images below should give you some idea of what to look for at the local book story, the library, the video store and just generally when selecting TV or internet content that is valuable for the upbringing of your child. I selected these items not only for their educational value but also for bringing the fear of God closer to your child.

What is God all about? 10 incredible valuable questions that will help your child understand what to fear and what to love.

Difficult to read but your child needs to know American traitors.

Valuable TV programs showing the true nature of Islam.

A firework of funny moments. This children’s classic with lighten up every child’s face!

Heartwarming story. Just beautiful.

I know, children should not watch beheading videos but in this case good parents need to make an exception. Our children need to know our enemies. No way around that.

More reality based internet content. Select websites that educate your child, not just entertain.

Last, but not least, the most important words every written. God’s pure wisdom: The Bible. Make your child read the bible every day. If you have problems with discipline, there is nothing wrong with striking your breed with the good book. That is why God made is so thick!

Thanks for reading folks.
All the best and good luck making your child a God-Warrior!

Shelley N. Goodman

43 comments

Dear Friends

Did you ever notice that almost all companies selling sweets, especially lollipops are firmly in lie-beral hands? Chupa Chups the world leading producer of “sucking candy” is supporting the democrat party with huge donations, every year. Why you ask? Because lie-berals have a strong tendency to child-sex and therefore one of their main objective is the conditioning of young girls to perform oral sex and/or to advance the skills of those already performing oral sex for their own perverse satisfaction. Lieberals and homosexuals have teamed up to corrupt your youth.

Once again it’s Paris Hilton setting a terrible example by sucking her candy in public. There will be a cold day in hell before I’ll allow my 15 year old daughter Lisa to suck a lollipop!

The act of sucking is quite instinctive and natural. Toddlers suck at their mothers nipples in order to satisfy their hunger. In later years the child might suck his/her thumb in order to re-create the sense of absolute security at their mother’s breast. Later again disgusting, perverse lieberals are using this urge to suck to pressure their girlfriends, wives or daughters to perform oral sex by sucking their penis. This sickening fact is one more reason for the need of martial law and the ensuing capturing and locking up of lieberals and homosexuals.

Please click on the tumbnail above.
Basic rule: Lieberals want to abuse your daughters, gays want to abuse your sons.
For more information and breaking news about the gay agenda, please click here!

We have to look back at the good old times when Jesus walked through America, bringing His message of hope and prosperity. Did Jesus have oral sex? NO, and neither should you.

More and more sucking candy producers are selling indecently shaped lollipops like this one shaped like a penis. This is the 2nd level of moral corruption. Not much longer and performing oral sex will be something like shaking hands.

In recent years more and more porn producers like Bel Ami, VisualPink or Private are using lollipops as a way of insinuating a lower age of the actor. They call it “teen porn”. How disgusting is that!!!

Children love lollipops because they taste good. Most children, other than lieberal children or the ones hit by the lolita effect, are not aware of the filthy indications.

Folks, please don’t allow your child to suck lollipops! Please don’t let lieberal policy corrupt your child’s mind. Thanks for reading through this article, dealing with this terrible controversial issue. I appreciate your loyal readership.

All the best. Your friend and Republican leader,
Shelley N. Goodman

30 comments

Friends,

A new liberal drug craze called “Jenkum” is sweeping our nation - it’s a dangerous new drug and one ‘huff’ of it can kill or send the user completely insane - but thanks to liberal congressional stonewalling this drug is completely legal and your kids could be using it at school - we need to do something about it

Its effects last for around an hour and consist of auditory and visual hallucinations. A fifth-grader in Lusaka said of Jenkem to an WorldNetDaily reporter: “Old man, this is more potent than cannabis.”

Is your kid on the Jenk? A 16-year-old boy described his preference for jenkem over other inhalants, “With glue, I just hear voices in my head. But with Jenkem, I see visions. I see my mother who is dead and I forget about the problems in my life.”

Jenkem is made from fermented human sewage: A quantity of the substance is placed in a bottle and the fermentation-gasses are captured in a baloon. After two or three weeks of ‘resting’, the baloon can be tied-off and the collected jenkem-gas can be used to ‘get high’.

Our friends at the Crollier county Sherrif’s office issued this urgent warning about Jenkem abuse in Florida’s schools. Please download this, print it and circulate it to your school and any parents at your church. We must all be aware of the Jenkem menace. [Click on the image for a high-res version]

Like Jazz music, AIDS and heroin Jenkum has it’s origin in darkest Africa. This low-cost ‘high’ became the drug of choice for poor african street-kids. Owing to lax clinton-era immigration policies, many of these Jenkem addicts moved to America to live on benefits. They brought their disgusting habit with them:

Before long the craze spread to America’s African community where “loons” of “winnie” or “butwash” are exchanged for hard-cash or stolen car-stereos in covert Jenkem clubs. It’s not just African Americans: White kids whose minds have been poisoned by secular culture have been pressued into giving it a try - only they can know the true hell of a jenkum addiction.

Is Barack Obmama a “Jenkie”? We asked his campaign team if he had ever used the substance, however his team refused to comment. Obama’s refusal to comment on Larry Sinclair’s drug use allegations suggest that Barack Hussein Obama might only have been snorting crack to drive away the stench of huffing Jenkem during his homosexual encounter with Mr. Sinclair.

What are we to do? It’s time to unite and drive out this Jenkem menace from our schools, churches and towns. Please take a moment this week to teach your children about the dangers of huffing Jenkem. If you homeschool, I suggest you print out the warning leaflet above and discuss the dangers of addiction with your kids. Responsible Christian parenting will save your kids from this awful addiction.

Jimmy

62 comments

STR readers who were kids during the 1980s might remember the ?Super Mario Brothers Super-Show?, back then one of the most bizarre Saturday morning shows. What many of you may not know is that this hyper-frenetic kids TV show was was turned into a series of video games that became somewhat popular in Japan.

Former champ wrestler “Captain” Lou Albano still makes a living by providing the voice of Nintendo’s Mario. Only the crazy Japanese could have been inspired to make a game from Lou’s crazy ideas!

Nintendo must be running out of ideas because this years’s over-hyped game is a return to Lou Albano’s psychedelic drug-fueled ?World of Mario?.

Nintendo have chosen this mediocre game as the subject of a multi million dollar advertising campaign. They intend to promote their red-capped plumber to a new generation of kids, but is that going to be enough to tempt kids away from Madden and some of the season’s excellent sporting titles.Super Mario Galaxy for Nintendo’s budget-price Wii console is basically a re-hashing of their 1991 ?classic? Super Mario Sunshine, in fact astute readers will notice that it shares exactly the same plot!

This is hardly likely to be a problem for Nintendo because almost nobody who has played the previous generation of Mario’s antics will be young enough to consider buying this ‘re-booted’ Mario.

As with all of Mario’s games, the story is simple and largely irrelevant to the action: Mario’s girlfriend ?Princess Peach? has been once-again kidnapped by ?Bowser?, a satanic, spiked dragon-like demon. Rather than inform the relevant authorities, Mr Mario sets out as a sort of vigilante in order to rescue his beloved.

In order to rescue Peach the red-capped plumber has to collect satanic pentagrams, mis-translated as ?power-stars? with which Mario intends to increase his own demonic power to rival Bowser’s. These pentagrams are scattered around a number of ?galaxies? through which Mario must battle his way in order to retrieve. Pentagrams are rewarded for taking risks, performing stunts or acts of aggression

Troubling: Pentagrams like these are the object of Mario’s quest. The Japanise occultists who provided the inspiration for Mario’s galaxy clearly believed that kids would be more likely to believe in it if they made the occult symbols cute.

Mario is an excessively violent game: Mario must defeat a series of enemies by slamming into them, attacking them with a hammer, incinerating them or by jumping on their heads. I hate to think what might happen if impressionable liberal teens try to imitate Mario’s preposterous acrobatics. A game this violent should certainly come with stern disclaimers.

I downloaded this image from a teen Mario fan’s web-site. “Powned” is hacker slang for “murdered”. The child is throwing a red igloo and an unidentified device at the girl - an all too familiar picture of liberal on liberal game-related violence. Anybody who thinks that video games do not encourage violence should look at this image and think hard.

The bad news does not end there: Assisting Mario and his brother Wario is a cohort of drug-peddling ?Lumas? - star like beings who provide Mario with magic-mushroom like power-ups which in typical RPG style enhance his fighting ability.

The most valuable commodity the Lumas sell are ?star-bits? - the World of Mario equivalent of crack-cocaine. In my extensive play-testing of this game I counted over sixty overt references to drug-taking or drug culture. Do you really want your kids indoctrinated into the culture of instant gratification?Could it get any worse you ask? How about the occult? In one particularly horrific level Mario is forced to transform himself into a phantom. In this guise Mario can commune with other evil spirits, something that is expressly forbidden according to God’s law. What are Nintendo trying to tell us? That demonology is good, or that kids should study the occult as a means to grow more powerful? This is the unfortunate message that kids will take from Super Mario’s game.

Bottom line: Super Mario galaxy is a game that will most likely appeal to pre-teens and color-blind imbeciles. Younger players will not notice it’s absurd and wildly inconsistent plot. Adults (with the exception of nappy-fetishists) will find it’s childish style off-putting.

Parenting Advice: ShelleyTheRepublican recommends that families avoid this game on account of in the unlikely case that your local suppliers decide to stock it. As an alternative you should consider the excellent ?Left Behind: Eternal Forces?, which is a 100% Christian game which unlike Mario teaches essential life-skills which will be of value if your child is unfortunately not raptured.

Jimmy Goddard

86 comments

Q:? How many pollacks does it take to defend America from radical students that would only go on to destroy it by giving aid and comfort to the enemy?

A:? One!? And his name is Ben Nowakowski.

Some say that the south side of Chicago is the baddest part of town but they ain’t never been to Berwyn and that’s to the west.? Judging by the America-hating students of Morton West High School you might as well be sitting in a cave with Osama bin Laden.?

On November 6th a junior al Qaeda cell staged a pro-terrorist “protest” in the halls of a government school disrupting classes and bringing what little education happens there to almost nothing.? Now, in Cambridge, MA and Bezerkly, CA that’s a typical day.

10am	School starts for those who wish to participate
10:05am	Islam:? The Only Peaceful Religion
11:00am	Lunch/Protest
12:00pm	Communism: A Plan For The Future
1:00pm	America: Deceitful, Doomed, Dead
2:00pm	Video Games
3:00pm	After School ? Soccer, Homo Club?and Contra Dancing

A typical class schedule for Cambridge Public Schools

In a regular government school the teachers, principals and the superintendent wouldn’t want to offend students bent on destroying America so they’d just let the “kids be kids” and go back to showing whatever kids was left how use condoms and write haikus.

This haiku “art” project done by a fifth grader at Fidel Castro
Elementry school in Cambridge received a “B” only because
it did not wish death upon President Bush.

But sometimes a true American slips through the hiring process and this time he was a pollack!? Ben Nowakowski cares about education and he had a plan to regain control over the wild west town that’d sprung up in one of his schools.? First, he told the kids that if they’d kindly move their “protest”.? Instead of obeying authority, they linked arms and started chanting what sounded to some like “Allahu Akbar”.? That’s when Superintendent Nowakowski locked down the classes to protect the other students from a possible homicide bomb attempt.

Skinheads and cross-dressing America haters make up
the bulk of junior al Qaeda cell members.

Then he got smart.? He promised the students that if they moved the “protest” they wouldn’t get suspended or kicked out of school and they just get detention for cutting classes.? The students agreed and moved outside.

Then he suspended them! And he’s thinking of kicking them out of school!?

An artist’s rendition of Superintendent Ben Nowakowski
kicking future suspected terrorists out of school

Take that, bin Laden!

Back when America was a moral place to live and there were no mosques, when a?teacher kicked your child out of school then the parent backed it up with a couple of kicks of their own the child walked in the door.? Today, though, with dead pre-borns littering the streets, hardcore pornography on prime-time television and God kicked out of our schools parents would rather spare the rod, call the ACLU and spoil the child.? And even worse, they’re planning on protesting the school themselves!

It’s not clear exactly what kind of protest the parents
of the Osama bin Laden Fan Club would stage.? It might be
anything from standing naked outside the school to a
full scale homicide bombing.

One thing is clear, though - with Ben Nowakowski as the Superintendent, there’s one school in America that ain’t going down without at fight!

No comments

Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lo-lee-ta: the tip of the tongue taking a trip of three steps down the palate to tap, at three, on the teeth. Lo. Lee. Ta. She was Lo, plain Lo, in the morning, standing four feet ten in one sock. She was Lola in slacks. She was Dolly at school. She was Dolores on the dotted line. But in my arms she was always Lolita. Did she have a precursor? She did, indeed she did. In point of fact, there might have been no Lolita at all had I not loved, one summer, an initial girl-child. In a princedom by the sea. Oh when? About as many years before Lolita was born as my age was that summer. You can always count on a murderer for fancy prose style. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, exhibit number one is what the seraphs, the misinformed, simple, noble-winged seraphs, envied. Look at this tangle of thorns.

Vladimir Nabokov in his wonderful novel “Lolita” 1956

.

Child sex is wrong but is sex the same as abuse? I don’t know anybody that condones child-abuse. I don’t know anybody who would shake the hand of a child abuser, and I know many that are not shy of throwing the first stone as soon as they have the chance to do so. I know many that don’t bother looking beyond the first impression. Who’s fault is it? Who allowed it to happen? Who was the perpatrator and who will continue to be the victim? Most children are innocent. Most children have a beautiful mind, not preoccupied with money, greed and prejudices. Most of us believe that the mind of a child is lilly-white and squeaky-clean. Like I said, most children’s minds but not all children’s minds.

There are always the ones following their dirty little agenda. The young girls that show a little too much of their young and flawless skin, the young girls that move a little too slowly hiding their hairless genitals when daddy walks into the bathroom by mistake.

The liberal media tells us that young girls are desirable, God tells us that following the impulse is wrong, the law makes sure that we suffer if we disobey God.

No man should be allowed to have sex with an underage girl, no question about that, but do we know all the facts after it happened? Do we know what was going on behind closed doors? Do we know who made the first move at night in bed, under the covers? I don’t doubt for a minute that no girl would be willing to admit any guilt in what happend. After all it’s society that encourages the child to say: “My daddy touched me, I was so scared!” Show me that person that is not pointing the finger at the father, that in truth and all fairness, sometimes bears no guilt of his own. Some people say it’s the devil that makes a girl-child become a whore, a slut, a skank. It’s commonly known as “the lolita effect”. Girls infected by Satans temptation wishes to engage in sexual conduct with adult males. Now let me ask you this: Who’s fault is it? Have you ever experienced a beautiful girl-child coming on to you, determined to have sex with you? Have you ever seen the tight flawless skin of a 13 year old illuminated by a 40 watt night lamp? Have you ever seen the small but firm breasts of a 13 year old girl looming under a thin nightgown? Have you ever been captures by the sexually charged gaze of a young girl wishing to touch and swallow your manlyhood? So if you don’t, don’t judge me, for I have experienced all that and much more.

This is Trixie Teen. She is the ultimate Lolita. Show me a man that could say “No!” to her! Not me. She’s the only woman I would leave my daughter for.

God made us men weak. God is testing us every day, but sometimes it’s so hard to overcome a temptation. If you fail a test, only the person who created the test has the right to fail you and as far as I know, God has never failed anybody because of one mistake made. My name is Sully Donovan and I was incarcerated for 2 years for impregnating my daughter when she was 13. My daughter is now 15 and we raise our baby girl together as man and wife. There is no doubt in my mind that my child’s child is a gift of God. When I look into her beautiful blue eyes I feel the same kind of love and affection I feel when I look at her mother. Say what you want but love can’t be wrong, especially when God blesses this love with a wonderful baby-girl. Mankind has no right to badmouth God’s creation.

I want to thank my friends Billy Bob, Barbara, Tristan, Sam and Shelley for all their support. A special thanks goes to Shelley for letting me tell the story of my life on this blog. A huge thank you to Shelley’s good-looking daughter Lisa for helping me write this article. Html is a filthy bitch.

Once more it became very clear that only Republicans are willing to look for the whole truth, to find the story behind the story. Republicans have a deep dedication to honor and justice. Where liberals scream and whine and point fingers there is no way justice can prevail. Only Republicans have a commitment to truth, justice and the American way deep enough to reveal the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

God bless America.
Sully Peterson

Picture sources: 1. Random House Books / 2. Lee Jeans / 3. VisualPink / 4&5. Trixieteen

52 comments

Greetings in Christ Jesus’ name!

It cannot be re-iterated frequently enough - Crosstalk America is the finest Christian radio show currently broadcasting.? The board mandated some years ago that Crosstalk was required listening and that spot questioning would take place to strictly enforce this policy. ? That I recall, only two or our hundreds of volunteers failed their quizzes.? On both occasions, they pleaded not to be let go claiming that the board was quibbling over “semantics”.? Bluntly, people who use words such as “semantics” to defend themselves have no place at Shelley The Republican.? Also, as I ponder the events, it occurs to me that both converted to Christianity.? There may be a lesson there.

But that is not the point.

On 8/15/07, Mr. Eliason interviewed Matt Trewhella, the founder of Missionaries To The Preborn.? If you have?never heard Pastor Trewhella speak then I cannot recommend that you listen to this show strongly enough.? I defy any person with a soul to come away from this program and continue their mindless and disgusting support of the slaughter of pre-born children.

One can walk through one’s life with the assumptions one holds blithely unaware that a subtle shift in one’s thinking might net a new and powerful idea.? One can never know where such a wind may blow from.? This is one of the gifts God bestows upon those who faithfully read STR and why I consider it an honor to include myself among those whom God guided to aid Shelley Goodman.? The staff of STR constantly strives to examine a problem from every side, divorcing themselves from prejudice and, thereby, allowing God to work through them.? I bring this up to explain how listening to Pastor Trewhella allowed me to open myself fully to God and find a new way to help raise awareness of child pornography.

After Mr. Eliason opened the show to telephone calls from listeners, a gentleman called up to inquire as to how Pastor Trewhella dealt with the childish furor of the pro-baby killer set to the large-format posters graphically depicting the helpless mangled corpses of innocent children dismembered at the bequest of selfish, whorish women who care more about attending rock concerts than human life.? The gentlemen also mentioned that these ghouls frequently whined about the effect such images could produce on small children.?

The following recounting of Pastor Trewhella’s response is here paraphrased

I don’t have any problem with children seeing these signs.? In fact, they need to see them.? I have eleven kids and when they get to be about three years old my wife and I show them pictures of babies cut into pieces by abortionists.? Their first question is - “What happened to the baby?”? You see, they recognize that poor murdered pre-born not as a mass of tissue for what it is - a child.? We explain in an age appropriate way that there are bad and evil men that kill innocent pre-born child, robbing them of the chance to serve God.? Those pre-borns make it into our family prayers at night.? Like I said, I’ve got eleven children and I don’t see any psychological damage done to any of them.

No psychological damage!? Put that in Freud’s pipe and “smoke it”!? He then continues.

As to the others, let me tell you a story that was told to me.? When the Americans liberated the death camps in Germany, they took every man, women and child to see the horrors done in the name of Hitler.? They said they took the men and women to show them the effect of their complacency.? And they showed the children the carnage so that it would never happen again.? This is the reason that people need to see these disturbing images.? They need it shoved right in their face so that they can see for themselves just how horrible the slaughter of pre-borns is.

Praise Christ Jesus!?

I sat in my office chair weeping.? I am not ashamed to admit this.? Anyone with a soul who would not weep at such words will undoubtedly suffer the fires of Hell.? But in my mourning for the sons and daughters cut down before their first breath of the sweet air of God, a voice of comfort and love whispered inside me, “and what of those who live to suffer a Hell on earth?? What will you do for them?”

I instinctively understood the action God expected from me - to use Pastor Trewhella’s methods to end all child pornography.

To that end, the board of STR plans to launch a new front in the battle to save the souls of our most precious resource.? Our initiative will be called Terminate Eroticism Against Boys And Girls.? The plan, modelled after Missionaries to the Pre-born, is to display large-format posters depicting child pornography in all its venal sinfulness.? Our teams will conduct rallies at targeted sites (daycare centers, Catholic “churches”, Disney movies etc) to inform, educate and mobilize citizens to bring a complete and utter cessation to child pornography.? In addition, we are currently producing fully illustrated pamphlet for parents to share with their children ages 3 and up that explains in an appropriate way what child pornography is and how to avoid it by obeying your parents and the protection that God’s love affords them.

As always, any constructive suggestions that might occur to you will be gratefully considered.

We hope that you will be as excited about this as we are.

Newton Wilcox
Board of Directors
www.shelleytherepublican.com

35 comments

Dear Readers

Paris Hilton needs our prayers in these hard times. She is such a wonderful young lady and she does not deserve to have to spend her precious time in a stinking prison-cell!

Paris Hilton, a fine young lady, a role model for America’s youth!

I urge you to get down on your knees at least once a day and pray for Paris. According to her relatives there is a risk she could commit suicide. Please send her your hope and prayers in support.

Thanks for reading this special action alert.

Shelley Goodman

28 comments

?

At Shelly The Republican, we know that out children are our most precious resource.? With government schools quickly dissolving into an open festering sore of drug addicted teachers having sex with students, is it any wonder that Lie-berals believe they can win the 2008 election with either a black muslim who smokes and snorts cocaine or a lesbian murderess?? ?Morality, schmality,? Obama-Nation cries out, ?let?s lower the age of consent to five.?

More than ever, we need to get books into the hands of our children that will teach them basic decency and respect for their country, two things that you will not find in government schools.

Democ-Rat teachers produce democ-Rat children.? In 10 years
the students and teachers will look alike.

Therefore, it?s with great pleasure that we announce the formation of Children Are Our Most Precious Resource Books.? This high quality line of titles is perfect for Christian Schools and Home Schools alike.? And short, easy to read words make these books perfect for the whole family!

While we?re still in the planning stages, we do have a number of titles currently in development that we are proud to share with you!

The Boy Who Cried Orange Alert
This lushly illustrated story teaches children that Homeland Security is no joke.

?

Ahmed Converts
Poor Ahmed prays nightly to his inferior god to know the healing power of Christ.? Will his wish be granted?

?

The Berenstien Bears Prepare For Disaster
Uh-oh!? Do YOU know what to do when the Terror Alert goes to red?? Poor Papa doesn?t!?? And Mama Bear?s not home!

Baby’s First Book Of Homeland Defense
From ?Air Tight? to ?Ziploc Bags?, this charming book shows kids in a light hearted and unthreatening way what to do when terrorists reduce their hometown to a smoldering mass of rubble.

?

Mommy, Why Do They Hate Us?
Children are often confused as to why terrorists would want to harm the most caring, helpful and friendly nation that ever existed on this earth.? This sensitive book gently introduces your child to the concept of unrepentant evil.

?

?The Snitch Who Saved The World
Seven-year old Billy?s best friend Jack has been acting a little strange lately.? Why?s he drawing a beard and moustache on his face with marker?? And what?s that ?Hillary For President? sign doing in his front yard?? Something?s fishy and Billy is scared.? Should he rat out his best friend?? And to whom?

?

Three Blind Liberals
Oh, those funny liberals!? They?re so concerned about sipping cappuccinos in their uptown Manhattan apartments they wouldn?t know a terrorist threat if it chopped off their tail!

?

Mrs. Cheney And The Bad Bunny
?Bad bunny,? scolded Mrs. Cheney, ?Bad, bad bunny!? Bad, bad, bad, bunny!??
In a world where sodomy is taught to kindergartners in public schools, it?s important to give a child practice in rebuking things normally thought of as benign.? With its repetition of ?bad bunny? a cute and cuddly rabbit turns into an object of hatred, teaching children the value of not accepting things at face value.

14 comments

Take a look at this and see if you can figure out the code

This lesson encourages students to look beyond the outside of a person and focus more on who the person is on the inside.

Well, gosh, there ain?t no code in there!? All it says it that you oughta not judge a book by its cover and what?s wrong with that?? I guess that means that if you see some book called ?Butt Boy Bondage? with a picture of some leather clad homosexual with a whip inserted in his rectum on the cover then you shouldn?t assume that it ain?t got a message of God?s love inside of it.? That?d make you a Jesus-Freak Redneck Homophobe, wouldn?t it.

?
If you can show me a “good” code I’d like to see it.? Most codes,
like The Davinci Code and this one are the Mark Of The Beast

And if you called somebody that you?d be calling them a name, wouldn?t you?? And if you called them a name then you wouldn?t have learned anything from No Name Calling Week sponsored by homosexuals that want to turn your child into a character in ?Butt Boy Bondage?.

No Name-Calling Week is an annual week of educational activities aimed at ending name calling of all kinds and providing schools with the tools and inspiration to launch an ongoing dialogue about ways to eliminate bullying in their communities.

It?s one thing to for a kid to call a kid a ?faggot? or a ?dyke? if the kid ain?t one.? That?s lying and it ain?t right.? But if the child is a faggot or dyke, well, that?s just telling the truth ain?t it?? The child made that choice.? Well, maybe that?s not quite right.? Kids are too young to know the difference between moral and immoral behavior.? That?s why the Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network started No Name Calling Week ? to support homosexual teachers in their quest to turn the children of people stupid enough to send their children to public school gay.

You can tell by looking at him/her that she/he’s about as
trustworthy as a kleptomaniac Jap in a camera store.? And
you’re gonna trust him/her with your pre-K child?

The usual suspects all ?partner? (as in, ?I?m Adam and this is my ?partner?, Steve?) with the Godless Liberal Sin Education Network.? Simon and Schuster (I wonder if the published ?Butt Boy Bondage??), The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, Amnesty International, It Takes A Team! (Women?s Sports Foundation) and the Anti-Defamation League.? Two of the ?partners? actually shocked me.? First off, Planned Parenthood because they’d rather?kill children.? Second, the Girl Scouts of America which must?ve lost their battle against lesbians.

If you want to read the whole foul plot you can download the ?lesson plan?.? I?d suggest making sure you got a barf bag close by.? Of course, you gotta cough up $130 to get the resource kit? that comes with a video, stickers and posters all of which probably have a pink triangle or a rainbow somewhere on them.? I wanna focus on one ?lesson? your child could be infected with.

The ?lesson? centers around gay author Todd Parr?s brainwashing book ?It?s OK To Be Different? which

combines rainbow colors, simple drawings and reassuring statements in this optimistic book? An illustration of two women (”It’s okay to have different Moms”) and two men (”It’s okay to have different Dads”) handles diverse families sensitively this could cover either same-sex families or stepfamilies and also on the opposite page, a kangaroo with a dog in its pouch (”It’s okay to be adopted”).

Uh huh.? Dogs and kangaroos.

?
Drag queens and aliens - these ain’t family values or
American values so why do we let our children get
taught them?

After you learn that it?s ?normal? to spit in God?s face and that a dog ain?t no different than a kangaroo then you get to do a little ?activity.?? The ?teacher? bring out a white egg and a brown egg and the victims, I mean, children, are supposed to talk about the eggs.? The teacher then asks the victims, sorry, children what they think the eggs will look like on the inside.? Then the eggs get cracked open and, whaddayknow ? they?re the same!? Then I guess you?re supposed to talk about how anal se