STR † THE FREEDOM BLOG©

I’m real sorry for putting this up late. The lie-berals over at WMFO apparent thought this show was too truthful and went and messed up the place that you get the thing from. Too bad for them that a lot of former godless Linux users find the strength and hope of Jesus Christ and was able to get the show anyway! Guess y’all lost again, SATAN!

Anyway, the “president” wants to let homos fight like girls in the military, which I guess makes sense if ya wanna lose the glorious War on Terror but like a retired military man told me, “ya can’t protect the front AND protect the rear.”

I also talk about the travesty of convicting Scott Roeder in 37mins and the good common sense of Phyllis Schlafly talking about how women can’t be oppressed cuz they live longer than men. Why don’t lie-beral THINK??

God is Love!
BBN

2 comments

I guess I shouldn’t be surprised anymore by foul, venal wickedness of Satanic lie-beral dumbo-crats.  After all, trying to pass bills that mandate teaching kindergartners how to have butt-sex (SAFE butt-sex, they claim, like there is such a thing) just don’t get anymore evil.  But Satan got a good imagination, I guess, so he keeps finding more and more horrifying ways to lay claim to our young folk. And dumbo-crats, sworn to do his bidding, fall right in line.

One part of Obamascare that they don’t want y’all to know about it the sex clinics they wanna set up in government schools.  They don’t wanna talk about it at all for a couple of different reasons

• They wanna convince your kids that they’re really homos
• They wanna convince your kids that drinking fluoridated water and “smoothies” is more “healthy” than drinking something good like Coca Cola
• They wanna teach your kids about which food is aphrodisiacs (those are foods the force you to have sex after you eat them)

But most of all, they wanna make it real easy to for your 13 year old daughter to kill her precious pre-born!

Y’all don’t believe me? Just take a listen to one of the few smart women in America, Michelle Bachman, expose the liberal plan to have daily abortion field trips to Planned Parenthood…WITHOUT YOU KNOWING ABOUT IT!

WRITE YOUR CONGRESSMEN AND TELL ‘EM TO STOP ABORTION FIELD TRIPS NOW!!

9 comments

The ObamaScare Culture of Death Bill just gets worse with every passing day. Not only does it force women to have abortions at the risk of jail time – not only does it mandate that the government will tell your grandma when where and how she’ll be killed, but now, thanks to the Liberty Council, we find out that Barak Osama Homo bin Laden wants to have power over whether you get to stay the same sex as you are right now!  IT’S TRUE!  Obamacide includes a bit that says that so-called “gender transformation surgery” is gonna be mandated if this prime example of socialized wickedness gets passed.  That means that Homobama’s jackbooted “citizen army” can bust into your house at any time of the day or night, grab your daughter and attach a penis to her. But I guess if you’re a lie-beral, that sex change you can believe in.

Briefly Patriotic – ObamaScare Mandates Sex Change Surgery

5 comments

My goodness! I can understand that lie-beral defeato-crats who don’t know nothing about Jesus or morality might wanna think that I’m some kinda idiot but when God-fearing Christians start attacking me, well, I just don’t know what to say!

I also talk about how Maria Sotomayor ain’t got no chance in heck to get confirmed for the Supreme Court.  I been watching the hearings and y’all can follow me on that Twitter thing – @stronline.  I’ll do a wrap up in a little bit but when a nominee threatens a senator with a gun you can be pretty much sure that the rapture is coming soon!

God is Love!
BBN
www.billybobneck.com

7 comments

It has come to the attention of the Board of Directors of Shelley The Republican that certain homosexual, liberal and other such European-oriented persons have attempted to smear our pristine reputation as defenders of ALL life with the base and baseless insinuation that, in some way, we were responsible for the death of the immoral mass murderer, George Tiller the Baby Killer.

Nothing could be further from the truth

After deep consultation with our lawyers, we can state plainly, conclusively and legally that according to the laws of the state of Iowa and the broader laws given by God to the United States of America, none of the staff of Shelley The Republican has any legal, moral or theoretical culpability in Scott Roeder’s decision to follow God’s wise plan and discontinue the career of a genocidal monster.

It should be noted that

1) None of the staff or related PACs, groups or clubs have provided monetary assistance to The Army of God, Operation Rescue or any other commonly known defenders of pre-born rights for at least the past fiscal quarter.  All efforts to defend pre-borns have been carried out by our own STR Ladies Against The Pre-born Genocide 5013c organization.

2) Scott Roeder has not monetarily contributed to ShellyPAC for at least the past three months which, according to the bylaws, dictate that he could not legally refer to himself as a "member" of ShelleyPAC.  Any reference he may or may not have made has no legally binding status with regard to our 5013c incorporation.

3) Scott Roeder has not monetarily contributed to STR Ladies Against The Pre-born Genocide for at least the past three months which, according to the bylaws, dictate that he could not legally refer to himself as a "member" of STR Ladies Against The Pre-born Genocide .  Any reference he may or may not have made has no legally binding status with regard to our 5013c incorporation.

4) Scott Roeder has not monetarily contributed to the Pray For George Tiller’s Death Prayer Circle for at least the past three months which, according to the bylaws, dictate that he could not legally refer to himself as a "member" of Pray For George Tiller’s Death Prayer Circle.  Any reference he may or may not have made has no legally binding status with regard to our 5013c incorporation.

5) None of the staff or related PACs, groups or clubs received or initiated contact with Scott Roeder since the time he made the decision to follow God’s wise plan and discontinue the career of a genocidal monster.

Furthermore, we at Shelley The Republican strongly condemn the fake-President’s decision to spend our tax dollars on FBI agents to defend other baby killers and genocidal perverts from the wrath of God.  Rather than going after peaceful, law-abiding Christians we suggest, instead, that he spend that money defending God-fearing Christians from the attacks of islamo-facists and homosexuals.

We also demand that he form a commision to look into his immediate impeachment.

In Jesus’ Name

Newton Wilcox
Board of Directors
Shelley The Republican

3 comments

Heavenly Father

On this, Your day of days
We humbly thank You for all that You do for us
From giving us the freedom and fire power to spread Your words of love and forgiveness to the wicked and deluded in the Middle East
To justly and rightly guiding the bullet that sent to George Tiller the Baby Killer to a Hell, the misery of which he could never imagine
And we take comfort from the fact that as he lay there bleeding all over the floor of his church, his calls for Your forgiveness went unaswered
For only You can kill pre-borns
We hope the positive effect of killing George Tiller will spur You to kill another abortionist today
And on every Sunday until the voice of all pre-borns can heard singing Your praises without fear of getting lynched in the womb

In Your Holy Name, we praise You

Amen

16 comments

.
.
I don’t think anybody would disagree when I say Obama’s biggest enemy is the family. His policies directly harm and destroy the structure of Family and its very core: Life.

1. Obama is pro Homosexuality and pro “Gay Marriage”. Hundreds of studies, done all over the world prove that Gay Marriage destroys the religious institution of marriage.

There is no question about it: If we allow gay marriage, people will start to demand to being able to marry dogs or plants. You don’t believe me? Just read the FoxNew article on the British slut who married a dolphin! Just because the pointy snout turns you on, you don’t have to marry the damn, stupid beast!

Homosexuality is a sickness that needs to be rooted out, not supported. Homosexuality goes hand in hand with drug and child abuse and we must stop it whatever it costs.

2. Obama is pro Abortion. 50 Million Americans have been killed which makes it a bigger tragedy than the Holocaust in Nazi Germany. Our “President” is trying to weaken the American society by killing the youngest of us and therefore splitting up families out of grief and pain.

If abortion ain’t considered murder it considerably weakens the morals of our society. People will start believing its just find to kill other human beings.

3. Obama is pro Terrorism. How can we feel safe with a “President” that does not think terrorism is a real threat, with a “President” that even pals around with terrorists? Obama has definite connections to terrorist cells himself. Some even say he IS a “one man terror cell”.

The Taliban in America, a sad reality because our negro “President” ain’t man enough to stand up to terrorism.

4. Obama has no morals. The “President” admitted to have taken drugs on several occasions. We all know that a drug addict can’t be cured. Once a junkie, always a junkie.

What happens if somebody offers him a line of snow or a shot of heroin? Scary thought: The leader of the free world can be bought with simple street drugs.

Folks, we need to impeach Obama. He has failed us: He promised to fix the economy, he didn’t, he promised us hope and prosperity but all he did is make things worse.

Please contact your representative in congress and urge them to begin impeachment proceedings. If we get to work right away we can get McCain/Palin in the White House by the end of the year!

Thanks for reading,
Shelley N. Goodman

16 comments

Today is inauguration day. The day the constitution of the United States will be killed. On this day a non-American illegal immigrant will be declared the President of the United States. I consider this day on of the darkest in American history. Today my friends it’s official: Terrorists won, America lost. Seven years ago, Osama Bin Laden killed 3000 fellow citizens and today we will make on of the our own President. What a shame.

The following will make sure you understand what life under Barack Hussein Obama really means.

God help us.

Shelley N. Goodman

52 comments

Dear Friends,

When it comes to pure fear mongering and hatred against America, nobody is worse than Alex Jones. Jones uses his position as syndicated radio talk show host and his access to the hearts and minds of up to 10 million listeners worldwide to sell cheap junk such as water filters, healing stones and other junk that is supposed to protect them from the evil people that control the planet. It might very well be the biggest con-job ever perpetrated on the American airwaves.

Jones, the maker of movies like “Zeitgeist” and “Loose Change 9/11” claims to fight for the American public and against a so called “New World Order” which he claims is trying to “exterminate 90% of mankind with material support of space aliens”. Unnamed sources confirm that he in fact is laughing about the gullibility of his listenership that keep buying his lies and distortions as well as all kinds of nonsense like storeable foods, magic teddy bears and silver coins. “The stuff I am selling can’t be too stupid that these morons won’t buy it” he is quoted by our sources inside the Alex Jones team. His personal wealth is very substantial after 13 years of on the air fear mongering. He is even going so far as to promoting dangerous hemp products on the air. Even though we all know badly hemp and its users are damaging the American society and we all know how expensive the war on drugs is, he still is promoting the use and sale of hemp on his radio show.

Perhaps the worst aspect of his daily radio broadcast is the open hatred against the Leader George W. Bush and the American government. I call for the arrest of Alex Jones and all his affiliates for the good of the Homeland. His wild-eyed conspiracy crap is polluting the minds of his listeners every day. This is especially bad when you take into consideration that America is in the midst of a fundamental transaction into a new societal structure using scientific methods of a kind the world has never been seen.

It is time that we acknowledge threats like this and deal with them accordingly. Human scum like that has to be sorted out of the American society. Today or better even yesterday.

Thanks for reading.
May God continue to bless America.

Shelley N. Goodman, Iowa City

82 comments

.

Dear Lord,

The American Holocaust is still going on. Abortion is still legal in America. We pray in Jesus’ name that you will find it in your heart to forgive us, O’Lord.

Real American are fighting every day to stop abortion but liberals go on killing your creation every day.

50 Million (50,000,000) Americans have been killed so far.

Please forgive them because they are blinded by liberal hatred against life. Please support us in our war against the American Holocaust.

Amen

****************************************************

Facts about Late Term Abortion

• Late term abortions are legal in most states. “Late Term” means that an abortion can be done up to the moment of birth. This means that a birth is being induced and in the act of birth the baby is being killed.
• Some late term abortions are being done by putting a salt-acid mixture into the baby’s lungs so that the child suffocates.
• In case of a failed late term abortions, means that if the child is BORN ALIVE, the “doctor” will often kill the crying (LIVING) baby. The act of killing is often been done by drowning the struggling child in a bowl of water. Sometimes the baby will be just strangled to death or it’s head is being cut off.
• The remains of the child will be thrown in the trash or the corps will be used for medical testings.

• INFANTICIDE – The following issues have been raised in order to get you to think more critically about infanticide and why infanticide would be an acceptable form of family planning among the majority of pre-industrial societies. It is normal for people in one society to judge the behavior of people in other societies in terms of the moral values of their own society. This is, in fact, the very definition of ethnocentrism. However, many issues can be raised regarding a variety of methods of family planning that place the practice of infanticide within a broader anthropological perspective.

• Most Americans would consider infanticide to be morally wrong. However, infanticide is widely practiced throughout the world. Is infanticide necessarily immoral and, if so, is it universally wrong? By what criteria do we make that determination, and do those criteria distinguish unambiguously between abortion, which is legal in our society, and infanticide which is not, but which is accepted and practiced in other societies?
• Abortion is legal and is accepted by the majority of the American population as morally correct. Why is abortion an acceptable method of family planning in the U.S., but not infanticide? To what extent are we, by accepting abortion and rejecting infanticide, defining one method of terminating a human life as morally acceptable while condemning another form as morally unacceptable? If infanticide is practiced by peoples who do not have access to abortion technology, can they be considered morally wrong for terminating a human life by the best means they have available to them while accepting our method of terminating a life because we possess the technological means to end that life before birth?
• How does the fact that our own society’s stand on both the legality and morality of abortion has changed radically in the past 30 years affect our certainty regarding the immorality of infanticide? Isn’t it quite possible that future generations may come to accept infanticide as a reasonable method of family planning, just as we now accept abortion and increasingly accept euthanasia and doctor-assisted suicide –practices which would have resulted in a doctor’s losing his or her license to practice medicine a mere 10 years ago?
• Steven Pinker, in his article, “Why They Kill Their Newborns”, distinguishes between neonaticide and the killing of older children (filicide). He shows that, while our own society condemns infanticide, we are, in fact, quite tolerant of those who kill newly born children. He reports that of nearly 300 women charged with neonaticide in the U.S., not one spent more than a night in jail. The general population was much more willing to deal leniently, for example, with the Grossberg-Peterson case involving the killing of a newborn than they were with the case of Susan Smith, who killed her two sons: one 14 months old, and the other 3 year old.
• Our notion that infanticide is committed by disturbed individuals is also not supported by research. First of all, women who practice neonaticide generally go on to become loving supportive mothers when they do have and raise children (as do mothers who have had abortions), in contrast to those women who kill older children. Secondly, as Pinker states, “it’s hard to maintain that neonaticide is an illness when we learn that it has been practiced and accepted in most cultures throughout history.” That many societies practice infanticide is clearly illustrated by the articles in the Infanticide packet.
• The acceptance of abortion but not infanticide in the U.S. has been justified on the grounds that a baby is alive while a fetus is not. When does a human life begin? How do we define life? In the article referred to above, Steven Pinker discusses how difficult it is to determine when a human organism becomes a person with a right to life. Conception, birth, the end of the second trimester are all rather arbitrary definition points for when a human organism becomes a person. Viability is also problematic, given that the human infant cannot survive on its own for several years after its birth and that many infants cannot survive at all without medical intervention, to say nothing of large numbers of the elderly. Furthermore, infant viability is a matter of degree and is clearly much less developed in humans than in most other mammals. Given the difficulty of establishing clear objective criteria for when personhood is achieved –in some societies “personhood” is not conferred until well after birth– on what grounds do we claim that one point in the human organism’s development is more valid and objective (i.e., less arbitrary) for establishing “personhood” and, thus, a right to life than any other point? If the definition of “personhood” is largely socially determined, to what extent is the criteria used for defining “personhood” in our own society any more objective and valid than that used in other societies? How does the controversy over when an abortion is acceptably performed in the U.S. affect our understanding of the social basis of our society’s definition of when life begins? What factors determine who is likely to accept Pinker’s definition and who is likely to reject it? How does their stand on the issue reflect their personal interests rather than an objective scientific look at the issue? Furthermore, when we set arbitrary boundaries as our defining points for the beginning of life, to what extent do we inadvertently kill human organisms that develop more quickly than the established norm? Finally, why is “personhood” used to determine when a human organism is alive rather than some less subjective critria? If we don’t use “doghood” or “cathood” to determine when dogs and cats are alive, are we being logically inconsistent to use “personhood” to determine when humans are alive? Is there a uniform, objective biological definition for the beginning of life that can be applied systematically to all living organisms, including dogs, cats and humans?
• Most biology textbooks define life as possessing the following characteristics: Cells, energy, heredity, reproduction and responsiveness to the environment. All living things are composed of cells. Even such microscopic unicellular organisms as bacteria are considered alive. All living things also acquire and use energy to maintain metabolism. All living organisms also possess DNA organized into genes and chromosomes which form the blueprint for how that organism will develop and grow. Similarly, all living organisms are potentially capable of reproduction. Being able to reproduce offspring which share their genetic material, living organisms (unlike non-living matter) are able to cause the transfer of genetic information from one generation to the next. Finally, living organisms are responsive to their environments. That is, they are affected by their environments and attempt to adapt to those environments. Are these characteristics, which are presented as distinguishing living organisms in nearly every biology textbook written, less applicable to a fetus than to a baby or a young child, to an invalid or an octogenarian, or for that matter to any human being? (Would they also apply to both the sperm and the unfertilized egg? The Roman Catholic Church maintains that they do, which is why it opposed artificial birth control.) If so, then on what logical or scientific grounds is it determined that a baby or a child is alive but not a fetus? What does this say about our society’s support of abortion but not infanticide? Is it logically consistent? And if it is not, then why is it so widely accepted?

  The definition of when life begins has changed radically in the U.S. during the past 40 years. To what extent has the definition of when life begins changed because newer definitions serve the changing interests of the individuals or political groups doing the defining? To what extent is the changing definition of life and the recourse to such concepts as “personhood” a function of the pivotal role that the abortion issue plays in American politics? Proponents of abortion in the U.S. refer to abortion as a “right” and challenge any qualification on a woman’s “right to choose”. Any factor that threatens that “right” is vigorously opposed, including mandatory waiting periods and parental notification laws. To what extent might the application of an objective interspecies definition of life to humans in general and to fetuses in particular, also be perceived as a threat by those who want to promote abortion as their “right”? A recent article in The Economist titled “The War That Never Ends” (June 13, 2003) examined the abortion issue in the U.S. at the 25th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade. The article distinguished between the continuing controversy over abortion in the U.S. and its general acceptance in Europe, including in such predominantly Roman Catholic countries as France, Spain and Italy. The article viewed the problem this way.

The shocking truth about Late Term Abortions. This is what abortion “doctors” don’t tell you: A birth is induced, the struggling, crying baby is being ripped from the womb feet first, then a big needle is crushed into the baby’s skull from behind and the brain is being sucked out. The baby will be born dead. The American Holocaust is very well alive!

The battered and ripped apart corpse of an American Citizen. His rights violated, murdered and kicked in the trash. This dead child was found behind an Abortion Mill in St. Paul in 2002. Killed and put in the trash, it’s body still warm. This is what Barrack Obama stands for.

This could have been your brother, your son or your friend. He was killed by heartless liberals that don’t value life. He could have invented a cure for cancer or he could have composed a beautiful symphony. He is one of the 50 Million killed in the American Holocaust.

I am so very very sorry Lord.
Please forgive us.

23 comments

More and more homosexuals are coming forward and claiming to had have anal and oral sex (in that order) with Senator and presidential hopeful Barack Hussein Osama.

Senator Obama yet has to discredit these serious allegations. What we know so far is the following:

Obama admitted to have taken serious drugs on several occasions. How do we know he is clean right now or that he will be in the future? Maybe he just wants to be president so he can buy more drugs!

Apparently Obama had gay sex. Do we want another sex offender in the oval office?

Obama is Anti-Life. How can we elect the child-killer to the highest office?

There are also serious questions regarding Obama’s true allegiance. Will he try to reinstate the slavery for white people? Does Obama believe in God or is he a Muzlim? Will he spend our tax money on his negro homies all over America? Senator Obama has yet to clarify several crucial points. Unless he does we can not allow him to be President.

Personally I have started my praying for Godly justice. I hope God will take him out before he can harm the homeland!

Yours,
Shelley N. Goodman

42 comments

We at Shelley The Republican applaud Mike Huckabee’s attempts to introduce some responsible positive campaigning into Primary season. At least one other mainstream blogger has made a firm commitment to ’speaking no evil’ ? but what do you do when presented by unspeakable evil? What can we say, for example, of Hillary’s latest ‘vote-winning’ idea?

She has decided to incorporate some of the most extreme whackjob eco policies into her already whackadoodle platform. According to a top Hillary aide, she has been studying China’s oppressive ?one child per family? law with a view to how she might implement a similar policy in the USA.China’s draconian policy is the ultimate insult to the family: The penalty for daring to have more then one child is a heavy fine, or more usually compulsory abortion. Hillary will never admit it publicly, but she has obviously been following the pagan communist’s inspiration for much of her political life.

According to our informant, a senior Clinton insider, this policy represents a moderate version compared to her original goal which was to implement compulsory human-recycling, in which families would be encouraged to nominate their old and sick for compulsory recycling. Apparently Hillary quickly realized that that particular policy did not test well, but she still thinks she is onto a winner by making babies illegal.It’s just speculation, but I just be she will try to find a way to bring back on-demand euthanasia, she will not be content with on-demand abortion.

According to radical environmentalists human-beings are the cause of all environmental damage. If we have fewer people, they reason, we will have less environmental damage. They claim that if almost all the human beings in the world can be eliminated then the earth might return to their own twisted vision of eco-paradise. Are you surprised that Hillary buys into this preposterous nonsense? Not if you’ve been watching her for as long as us!Have you ever wondered why it is that liberals like Clinton seem to hate America so much? It’s simply because America is full of people, and people are exactly what liberals hate.

19 comments

Today I want to address one of the most pernicious arguments of the pro-mass murder, pro-infanticide, so-called pro-choice (ie anti-life) brigade.

These whining liberal cohorts of the death doctors and Hillary Clinton voters like to pose what they call ‘moral conundrums’ and ‘rational questions’ to justify their crimes.

Let’s ignore the fact, for now, that there really is no such thing as a moral conundrum, since the answer to everything is laid out plain and simple, straight and clear in a book we Christians know as the Holy Bible. (Remember “Thou Shalt Not Kill?” How much more specific do you want it?!)

Let’s just take on the question they always throw in the face of those trying to save lives outside the death clinics:

“What if the woman who intends to murder her baby was a victim of rape?”

I’m sure every Christian has had to respond to that question at some time in their lives. So today, I want to provide a simple three point guide as to how to take on the atheist sicko who puts it to you:

Let’s address this question point by point, in three easy points:

Point One: Two wrongs don’t make a right. Just because the woman is a bit annoyed that doesn’t mean she has to kill a baby now does it? Did Mary kill Jesus just because God didn’t ask her if she wanted it first?

Point Two: Rape is nothing like as horrific as getting your brains sucked out and finding yourself dead and dumped in a bin. Come on ladies! Get over it already. You turn it into a far worse crime by dwelling on it.

Point Three: How do we know the woman was really raped? So often women like to cry wolf, and get the man in trouble when the fault is really theirs. The first question I think we should all ask in this situation of so-called rape is: “is she a slut?” Invariably, in the case of those intent on killing babies the answer is: yes.

I think that this last point merits further investigation. Women today are such slatterns and temptresses, who can really blame men for reading the signals wrong? Just look at this picture:

What does that picture say to you? With those cum-hither smiles, short skirts and provocative tops there is only one message that these temptresses are giving out: free, easy, no questions asked sex however and whenever you want it, boys.All the same, if a man does accept this explicit invitation, he’s likely to find himself banged up in jail, having to get used to the knowledge that a genocide doctor is going to suck his screaming child out of his erstwhile female friend’s womb.

How is this justice?

And yet, outside of decent Christian communities every woman dresses like that. In Democrat areas that kind of filthy outfit is the most common one there is. And yet! As we all know, it’s Democrats who are always first to cry rape and the first to have their babies murdered.

Isn’t it disgusting?!

Shame on them!

Shame!

Yours In Christ,

Sam Johnston

127 comments