STR † THE FREEDOM BLOG

.

Dear Readers,

I just recently came across these shocking articles:

A gang murdered and mutilated a 10-year-old albino girl in Tanzania - because they wanted to sell her body parts to witch doctors.

Albino body parts - A hot demand in Burundi. A man and a teenage girl who were killed in Burundi were reportedly found dead with their legs and arms missing. Police also confirmed that the tip of the girl’s tongue was also removed.

Many people in Tanzania — and across Africa, for that matter — believe albinos have magical powers. They stand out, often the lone white face in a black crowd, a result of a genetic condition that impairs normal skin pigmentation and strikes about one in 3,000 people here. Tanzanian officials say witch doctors are now marketing albino skin, bones and hair as ingredients in potions that are promised to make people rich.

For good Christians like me it’s shocking how prevalent the culture of death really is in Africa. In that case though we might be able to understand Barack Obama’s motivation to become president.

Quick facts:

• Obama is a negro
• Obama hates white people
• Obama has practiced witchcraft and voodoo in the past
• Obama’s allegiance is with his African tribe rather than with the American people

Folks, wake up! Can’t you see what Obama’s plans for America are? As soon as he is in office we will slaughter Americans and ship our body parts to his family in Africa for voodoo magic purposes! That is how they do it! My God, don’t let him become president!!!

Thanks for reading,
Shelley N. Goodman

Dear Friends,

When it comes to pure fear mongering and hatred against America, nobody is worse than Alex Jones. Jones uses his position as syndicated radio talk show host and his access to the hearts and minds of up to 10 million listeners worldwide to sell cheap junk such as water filters, healing stones and other junk that is supposed to protect them from the evil people that control the planet. It might very well be the biggest con-job ever perpetrated on the American airwaves.

Jones, the maker of movies like “Zeitgeist” and “Loose Change 9/11” claims to fight for the American public and against a so called “New World Order” which he claims is trying to “exterminate 90% of mankind with material support of space aliens”. Unnamed sources confirm that he in fact is laughing about the gullibility of his listenership that keep buying his lies and distortions as well as all kinds of nonsense like storeable foods, magic teddy bears and silver coins. “The stuff I am selling can’t be too stupid that these morons won’t buy it” he is quoted by our sources inside the Alex Jones team. His personal wealth is very substantial after 13 years of on the air fear mongering. He is even going so far as to promoting dangerous hemp products on the air. Even though we all know badly hemp and its users are damaging the American society and we all know how expensive the war on drugs is, he still is promoting the use and sale of hemp on his radio show.

Alex Jones likes to be portrayed as young and hip when all he is, is a rancid old snakeoil salesman!

Perhaps the worst aspect of his daily radio broadcast is the open hatred against the Leader George W. Bush and the American government. I call for the arrest of Alex Jones and all his affiliates for the good of the Homeland. His wild-eyed conspiracy crap is polluting the minds of his listeners every day. This is especially bad when you take into consideration that America is in the midst of a fundamental transaction into a new societal structure using scientific methods of a kind the world has never been seen.

The young Alex Jones stuffing himself at MacDonalds, enjoying the fruits of American labor and ingenuity, yet all he has to offer is fear, stupid conspiracy theories and lies directed at the government. Y’all know me, I am a 100% pro life but this is the best damn argument for abortion I’ve ever heard. Maybe we should consider retroactive abortion in his case.

It is time that we acknowledge threats like this and deal with them accordingly. Human scum like that has to be sorted out of the American society. Today or better even yesterday.

Thanks for reading.
May God continue to bless America.

Shelley N. Goodman, Iowa City

.

Dear Lord,

The American Holocaust is still going on. Abortion is still legal in America. We pray in Jesus’ name that you will find it in your heart to forgive us, O’Lord.

Real American are fighting every day to stop abortion but liberals go on killing your creation every day.

50 Million (50,000,000) Americans have been killed so far.

Please forgive them because they are blinded by liberal hatred against life. Please support us in our war against the American Holocaust.

Amen

Facts about Late Term Abortion

• Late term abortions are legal in most states. “Late Term” means that an abortion can be done up to the moment of birth. This means that a birth is being induced and in the act of birth the baby is being killed.
• Some late term abortions are being done by putting a salt-acid mixture into the baby’s lungs so that the child suffocates.
• In case of a failed late term abortions, means that if the child is BORN ALIVE, the “doctor” will often kill the crying (LIVING) baby. The act of killing is often been done by drowning the struggling child in a bowl of water. Sometimes the baby will be just strangled to death or it’s head is being cut off.
• The remains of the child will be thrown in the trash or the corps will be used for medical testings.

• INFANTICIDE - The following issues have been raised in order to get you to think more critically about infanticide and why infanticide would be an acceptable form of family planning among the majority of pre-industrial societies. It is normal for people in one society to judge the behavior of people in other societies in terms of the moral values of their own society. This is, in fact, the very definition of ethnocentrism. However, many issues can be raised regarding a variety of methods of family planning that place the practice of infanticide within a broader anthropological perspective.

• Most Americans would consider infanticide to be morally wrong. However, infanticide is widely practiced throughout the world. Is infanticide necessarily immoral and, if so, is it universally wrong? By what criteria do we make that determination, and do those criteria distinguish unambiguously between abortion, which is legal in our society, and infanticide which is not, but which is accepted and practiced in other societies?
• Abortion is legal and is accepted by the majority of the American population as morally correct. Why is abortion an acceptable method of family planning in the U.S., but not infanticide? To what extent are we, by accepting abortion and rejecting infanticide, defining one method of terminating a human life as morally acceptable while condemning another form as morally unacceptable? If infanticide is practiced by peoples who do not have access to abortion technology, can they be considered morally wrong for terminating a human life by the best means they have available to them while accepting our method of terminating a life because we possess the technological means to end that life before birth?
• How does the fact that our own society’s stand on both the legality and morality of abortion has changed radically in the past 30 years affect our certainty regarding the immorality of infanticide? Isn’t it quite possible that future generations may come to accept infanticide as a reasonable method of family planning, just as we now accept abortion and increasingly accept euthanasia and doctor-assisted suicide –practices which would have resulted in a doctor’s losing his or her license to practice medicine a mere 10 years ago?
• Steven Pinker, in his article, “Why They Kill Their Newborns”, distinguishes between neonaticide and the killing of older children (filicide). He shows that, while our own society condemns infanticide, we are, in fact, quite tolerant of those who kill newly born children. He reports that of nearly 300 women charged with neonaticide in the U.S., not one spent more than a night in jail. The general population was much more willing to deal leniently, for example, with the Grossberg-Peterson case involving the killing of a newborn than they were with the case of Susan Smith, who killed her two sons: one 14 months old, and the other 3 year old.
• Our notion that infanticide is committed by disturbed individuals is also not supported by research. First of all, women who practice neonaticide generally go on to become loving supportive mothers when they do have and raise children (as do mothers who have had abortions), in contrast to those women who kill older children. Secondly, as Pinker states, “it’s hard to maintain that neonaticide is an illness when we learn that it has been practiced and accepted in most cultures throughout history.” That many societies practice infanticide is clearly illustrated by the articles in the Infanticide packet.
• The acceptance of abortion but not infanticide in the U.S. has been justified on the grounds that a baby is alive while a fetus is not. When does a human life begin? How do we define life? In the article referred to above, Steven Pinker discusses how difficult it is to determine when a human organism becomes a person with a right to life. Conception, birth, the end of the second trimester are all rather arbitrary definition points for when a human organism becomes a person. Viability is also problematic, given that the human infant cannot survive on its own for several years after its birth and that many infants cannot survive at all without medical intervention, to say nothing of large numbers of the elderly. Furthermore, infant viability is a matter of degree and is clearly much less developed in humans than in most other mammals. Given the difficulty of establishing clear objective criteria for when personhood is achieved –in some societies “personhood” is not conferred until well after birth– on what grounds do we claim that one point in the human organism’s development is more valid and objective (i.e., less arbitrary) for establishing “personhood” and, thus, a right to life than any other point? If the definition of “personhood” is largely socially determined, to what extent is the criteria used for defining “personhood” in our own society any more objective and valid than that used in other societies? How does the controversy over when an abortion is acceptably performed in the U.S. affect our understanding of the social basis of our society’s definition of when life begins? What factors determine who is likely to accept Pinker’s definition and who is likely to reject it? How does their stand on the issue reflect their personal interests rather than an objective scientific look at the issue? Furthermore, when we set arbitrary boundaries as our defining points for the beginning of life, to what extent do we inadvertently kill human organisms that develop more quickly than the established norm? Finally, why is “personhood” used to determine when a human organism is alive rather than some less subjective critria? If we don’t use “doghood” or “cathood” to determine when dogs and cats are alive, are we being logically inconsistent to use “personhood” to determine when humans are alive? Is there a uniform, objective biological definition for the beginning of life that can be applied systematically to all living organisms, including dogs, cats and humans?
• Most biology textbooks define life as possessing the following characteristics: Cells, energy, heredity, reproduction and responsiveness to the environment. All living things are composed of cells. Even such microscopic unicellular organisms as bacteria are considered alive. All living things also acquire and use energy to maintain metabolism. All living organisms also possess DNA organized into genes and chromosomes which form the blueprint for how that organism will develop and grow. Similarly, all living organisms are potentially capable of reproduction. Being able to reproduce offspring which share their genetic material, living organisms (unlike non-living matter) are able to cause the transfer of genetic information from one generation to the next. Finally, living organisms are responsive to their environments. That is, they are affected by their environments and attempt to adapt to those environments. Are these characteristics, which are presented as distinguishing living organisms in nearly every biology textbook written, less applicable to a fetus than to a baby or a young child, to an invalid or an octogenarian, or for that matter to any human being? (Would they also apply to both the sperm and the unfertilized egg? The Roman Catholic Church maintains that they do, which is why it opposed artificial birth control.) If so, then on what logical or scientific grounds is it determined that a baby or a child is alive but not a fetus? What does this say about our society’s support of abortion but not infanticide? Is it logically consistent? And if it is not, then why is it so widely accepted?

  The definition of when life begins has changed radically in the U.S. during the past 40 years. To what extent has the definition of when life begins changed because newer definitions serve the changing interests of the individuals or political groups doing the defining? To what extent is the changing definition of life and the recourse to such concepts as “personhood” a function of the pivotal role that the abortion issue plays in American politics? Proponents of abortion in the U.S. refer to abortion as a “right” and challenge any qualification on a woman’s “right to choose”. Any factor that threatens that “right” is vigorously opposed, including mandatory waiting periods and parental notification laws. To what extent might the application of an objective interspecies definition of life to humans in general and to fetuses in particular, also be perceived as a threat by those who want to promote abortion as their “right”? A recent article in The Economist titled “The War That Never Ends” (June 13, 2003) examined the abortion issue in the U.S. at the 25th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade. The article distinguished between the continuing controversy over abortion in the U.S. and its general acceptance in Europe, including in such predominantly Roman Catholic countries as France, Spain and Italy. The article viewed the problem this way.

The girl who was stoned to death for falling in love

by NATALIE CLARKE

A teenage girl lies dead on the ground in a pool of her own blood.
Her once groomed hair is cast across her face like a rag doll’s, her skirt pulled up to complete her humiliation.

In another image, she is seen lying on her side, her face battered and bloodied, barely recognisable.

The concrete block used to smash in her face lies next to her.

Du’a Khalil Aswad was beaten, kicked and stoned for 30 minutes at the hands of a lynch mob before one of her attackers launched a carefully aimed fatal blow.

The murder was carried out in public, watched by hundreds of men cheering and yelling. Du’a’s crime? To fall in love with a Sunni boy. Her family practised the Yezidi religion.

The Sunnis and Yezidis hate each other. When Du’a ran away with her Sunni boyfriend, a sentence of death was passed on her.

This act of medieval savagery took place last month in a town in northern Iraq, in the fledgling ‘democracy’ created by Bush and Blair when they invaded the country in 2003 and ‘freed’ its people.

The sickening scenes, which defy belief in every sense, were captured by some of the observers and participants who thought it would be proper to record these harrowing events as some sort of memento.

Perhaps they thought it would serve as a warning to other young people who dared to follow their hearts - not the strictures of a religion which will not brook dissent - and punishes adolescent impetuosity with the most brutal of public murders.

The killing was filmed on a number of mobile phones. The images were then - all too predictably - posted on the internet.

The Mail takes no pleasure in publishing these pictures. But we believe our readers should witness the depths of the depravity still being carried out in the 21st century in the name of ‘honour’.

Perhaps, then, something can be done to prevent it happening again.

Of course, anyone who takes even a passing interest in news is all too aware of the tragedy that has engulfed the people of Iraq: the daily bombings, murders and kidnappings.

The subjugation of its women, however, has been largely ignored. Yet according to cultural observers, the number of so-called ‘honour killings’ has increased in Iraq since the fall of Saddam Hussein.

Campaigners say there is an ‘epidemic’ of such killings in the wartorn country. Autopsy reports in Baghdad often conclude with the verdict: “Killed to wash away her disgrace.”

The filming of Du’a’s death was just one more macabre element of her killing, but it has achieved something those bloodthirsty amateur filmmakers could not have predicted: it has brought such practices into the open and exposed them to the wider world.

It is, of course, too late for Du’a, a strikingly pretty young girl with long auburn hair. The 17-year-old must have hoped that the ‘liberation’ of her country would afford her opportunities she might otherwise never have had - for her education and a life of happiness free from oppression.

She lived with her family in the town of Bashika, near Mosul. They were neither rich nor poor.

It is believed Du’a met her Sunni boyfriend - whose name is not known - several months ago. They had grown up in an environment where hatred against rival factions is the norm.

The Yezidis - a Gnostic sect which combines Islamic teachings with Persian religions - despise the Sunnis; the Sunnis loathe the Yezidis.

Du’a and her boyfriend would have been all too aware that theirs was a forbidden love. But like so many teenagers before them, right back to the illicit love of Romeo and Juliet, they couldn’t help themselves.

For a while, they met in secret. It was during one such highly charged meeting that they came up with a plan to run away together.

It is not clear whether this desperate measure was a result of their having sought and been refused permission to marry, or if they decided to do it knowing that such permission would never be obtained.

“Her family would never have agreed to such a marriage,” says Diana Nammi, a leading Kurdish women’s rights campaigner.

Some Muslim groups have claimed that Du’a converted to Islam shortly before her murder. According to other reports, her boyfriend denies this.

They ran away together to an address in Bashika. The girl’s family alerted the police and Du’a and her boyfriend were found just a few days later.

According to Ms Nammi, who is calling for the girl’s killers to be brought to justice, Du’a was arrested and put into prison.

A few days later, the police apparently received assurances from the leader of her tribe - who Ms Nammi believes is Du’a’s uncle - that the girl would not be harmed.

What happened next is the subject of conflicting reports. According to some, the house of the tribal leader was stormed by a mob and Du’a dragged out and killed.

Ms Nammi, however, says she has information that it was the tribal leader who betrayed his niece to the mob. In this man’s eyes, Du’a had committed an unforgiveable crime, punishable by death.

The family’s ‘honour’ had been besmirched. The moment Du’a was placed in his house, her fate was sealed.

On April 7, Du’a was brought out of the house in a headlock to face the lynch mob. Hundreds of men were waiting for her - the excited atmosphere is said to have resembled a large sporting event - but no women.

On the video, Du’a’s screams can be heard as she is dragged to the ground. In a further humiliation, her lower body has been stripped.

Instinctively, Du’a tries to cover herself; only later was a piece of clothing thrown over her.

She is surrounded by an enormous crowd jockeying for a good view of the ritualistic killing. About nine men take part in the attack, including, it is thought, members of the girl’s family.

To any father of a daughter, that a helpless girl should be set upon with such cowardly savagery is beyond comprehension. One can barely imagine her terror.

It is a profoundly disturbing spectacle. One man kicks her hard between the legs as she screams in agony. Du’a tries to lift herself up, but someone hurls a concrete block into her face.

Another man stamps on her face. Someone kicks her in the stomach. Police officers stand idly by, some of them apparently enjoying the spectacle as much as anyone else.

Meanwhile, some observers film the execution on their mobile phones - the modern world intruding on a spectacle that belongs more in the Roman arena than in an apparently civilised society.

After half an hour of this savagery, Du’a is finally - mercifully, perhaps - dead. In a final humiliation, a man tries to lift her up, but drops her again, and her bloodied body is rolled face down into a puddle of blood. The family has had its ‘honour’ restored.

According to Ms Nammi, Du’a’s parents did not want her to be stoned, though it is not clear whether they might have agreed for her to be killed in some other way.

After her murder, according to Ms Nammi, two men were arrested by Iraqi police, but she has heard they were subsequently released without charge.

Reports suggest that two of Du’a’s uncles and four other people fled the town as investigators began to search for the culprits. It is thought these included her brother, who appeared in the video of the murder.

As for Du’a’s boyfriend - who has lost the girl he loved in the most awful circumstances imaginable - he went into hiding for a while, but it is believed that no action has been taken against him.

Du’a was buried in a simple unmarked grave. Later, says Ms Nammi, her body was exhumed by the Kurdish authorities, who have autonomous control of the region, and sent to the Medico-legal Institute in Mosul.

There her body was examined to find out whether she had been a virgin or not, before being returned to the Sheikh Shams cemetery.

To our Western eyes, this posthumous assault on Du’a’s body is the final insult. But according to Ms Nammi, it did at least establish that she was still a virgin and innocent of the ‘crime’ of which she had been accused.

However, Ms Nammi believes the mere fact that Du’a had run off with a Sunni boy would have been enough to have her sentenced to death.

Meanwhile, the cycle of tit-for-tat murders continues in Iraq. In this instance, in an apparent act of retaliation for Du’a’s murder, 23 Yezidi workers were attacked and killed two weeks later, apparently by members of an armed Sunni group.

The men were travelling on a bus between Mosul and Bashika when their vehicle was halted by the gunmen, who made them disembark before killing them.

Tomorrow evening, Ms Nammi, founding member of the Iranian and Kurdish Women’s Rights Organisation, will lead a group of women meeting in Shoreditch, East London, to remember Du’a Khalil Aswad and give back to her the dignity torn from her by her violent death.

The women are pledged to campaign against the entrenched beliefs which lead to such senseless deaths - and the fact that the people who commit these crimes are not regarded as murderers, but as heroes of the community.

According to Ms Nammi, there have been an estimated 10,000 cases of honour killings in the Kurdistan region in the past decade.

Under Iraqi law, the punishment for anyone found guilty of an honour killing is just six months in prison.

“Something has to be done to stop this,” says Ms Nammi, who came to Britain in 1996. “There is an epidemic of so-called honour killings. It is almost routine and utterly unacceptable.

“We would greatly appreciate any contribution from the British Government in preventing these murders of women in Iraq.”

Ms Nammi has the support of Amnesty International.

“This young girl’s murder is truly abhorrent and her killers must be brought to justice,” says Kate Allen, Amnesty International UK Director.

“Unless the authorities respond vigorously to this and other reports of crimes in the name of “honour”, we must fear for the future of the women in Iraq.”

For the sake of 17-year-old Du’a, an innocent girl who simply fell in love with the wrong man, it is all too little, too late.

.
.
Everybody knows the old poster saying: “WANTED, DEAD OR ALIVE”. The modern perfected version of that poster is Crimestoppers USA.

Like my old friend Tristan Shuddery once said: “Everything worth owning, buying or using was invented in America!” And now true it is, still today. The non-profit organization Crimestoppers can be found in every civilized nation on earth.

Crimestoppers can be found in every county in America, just google your city name and crimestoppers, it surely comes up. In Iowa City for example you just dial 358-TIPS (8477) or, if you are a AT&T customer you just dial *TIPS, voilla!

For those of you who don’t know what Crimestoppers is, let me explain. It’s a hotline, in many cases already incorporated into the police departments. You can give them tips on criminal activity in your area. And EVERY successful tip will be rewarded with an amount of 50 - 1000 Dollars! The average sum paid out is 400 Dollars, tax free! I for one reported many incidences of crimes and earned 1400 Dollars so far! Are they performing abortions? It’s really worth to keep your eyes open and take a closer look at your neighbors. Are they hiring illegal aliens as nannies or gardeners? Are they gambling? Are they paying their taxes? If they do something wrong you can do something right. They land in jail and you get the money. It’s a wonderful thing. It not only improves the security, it really gives you a sense of community. I literally report ALL towel-heads I see, just to be on the safe side.

You can also submit your tips online at TIPSUBMIT.COM! This is a nationwide tip submission site. You can report all kinds of suspicious activity. Attention, students! Do you know somebody dealing drugs at your school? Do you know somebody that is carrying an unregistered weapon? Do you know a teacher having sex with their students? If so you can make a lot of money and get the xBox you always wanted! Maybe even an Atari Jaguar! You don’t even have to see the crime yourself! You can just mark “Another student told me about it” and once they got the criminal, YOU get the money! Just do it, help make America better!

Thanks for reading.

Yours,
Shelley The Republican

This is Stacy Fullerton bringing you this breaking news from downtown Chicago. According to Fox News the Choir Director at Barack Obama’s Church Found Slain.

Donald Young was found unresponsive by police early Sunday. The Cook County medical examiner’s office ruled the death a homicide. An autopsy found the 47-year-old Young suffered multiple gunshot wounds.

Chicago Police spokesman Wayne Frisbie said Tuesday the victim’s roommate returned to the apartment late Saturday and discovered Young shot in the head. The front door to the apartment was closed but unlocked, Frisbie said.

The Reverend Jeremiah Wright Junior said Young was well-loved at Trinity United Church of Christ, where Obama, a Democrat, is a member of the congregation.

Young also taught fourth grade and was planning to attend graduate school to become a school principal, Wright said.

Funeral services for Young are scheduled for Thursday.

What is Obamas involvement in this? According to recent news he is involved in the homosexual community just like the murder victim. We all know that most homosexuals know each other intimately. I think Barrack Hussein needs to answer these crucial questions.

I did some investigation myself and there are strange rumors in Barracks neighborhood. According to unnamed sources there are coming “strange smells” out of Barracks house. Further he is known to buy a lot of air fresheners in all it’s forms. People who know Barrack say that he acts very strange every time somebody gets murdered in the closer vicinity.

There are some serious developments in this unfolding story. You can count on ShelleyTheRepublican.com to keep you informed. We are one of the very few sources that dare to ask the inconvenient questions.

Stay tuned.

Stacy Fullerton

Friends,

Can you call yourself a Christian if you do not fully embrace all of God’s words in the bible? What if you only accept 99% of the bible, heck ? what if you only accept the parts you like and throw out the rest? Do you still get to call yourself Christian? Most sensible people say no ? the only way to get to Heaven is to accept all of God’s words.

A prawn ? God tells us that this eating this hideous abomination is just as bad as performing an act of homosexual sodomy. Why do we allow these prawn eaters to flaunt their disrespect for GOD’s word in our community? It’s disgusting and shameful.

We all know that God does not want us to be gay ? he hates Homosexuals and calls them an abomination. That is why he has told Christians that they must be put to death, but what of the other things that god abhors? In Leviticus 11:10, GOD makes it perfectly clear that he does not want us eating shellfish either, yet how many so-called Christians you know greedily feast upon these forbidden foods?

The Mussel - eaten by the Godless French by the million. Every year thousands of people die from seafood poisoning because they ignored God’s commandments ? is this just an accident or is GOD punishing us for defying his eternal words?

I’m going to make this perfectly clear: Anybody who eats squid, prawns, lobsters and other shellfish ? you folks are going to Hell. Suppose you eat a bowl of toxic mussels and you die of poisoning without having time to repent of your sins ? you are going to be damned forever. GOD says it plain as say in the Holy Bible.

A lobster: This un-holy, foul beast lives it’s life amongst the muck and filth of the sea bed. Pastor Bucks assures me that the demons of Hell look just like this repsive specimen. I feel sick just looking at this miniature monster from the deep. It’s tentacles and claws disgust me, and they disgust Jesus too.

Why on earth are we allowing these abominations to go on in America ? the land t hat Jesus founded to be a Christian nation that would uphold his laws? There are three fish restaurants in the city nearest to my home ? every single one of these restaurants is violating biblical law. It’s time to stamp this out ? STR humbly proposes that proprietors and customers of restaurants that serve shellfish and other forbidden foods should be put to death in accordance with God’s almighty word.

On the video below, a young American hero tells about his duty in Iraq. Liberals seem to think that war is a clean and fair thing. Newsflash you bleeding heart morons: IT AIN’T!

All American soldiers, serving oversees are heroes by default. That is a fact of life. They risk their lives to make sure we are free! So what if they have a little fun with them hatshis?

Personally I don’t condone murder, torture, rape and slaughter but I haven’t been there. I don’t know what it is like, so I put all my trust in the goodness of the American soldiers.

America, right or wrong. DEAL WITH IT!

Thanks for reading,
Shelley N. Goodman, Infragard member, proud republican, American all the way!

Recently, a high-level member of the Homobama campaign refrer to Hillary Rodham Clinton as a monster.? We believe that her description was an apt one.? As stated previously “Mrs.” Clinton would like nothing more than to clone herself so that she may engage in lesbian practices upon herself.? Such is the disgusting perversion of the Democrat party.

As Vic Eliason is fond of saying, there is no such thing as the “lesser of two evils - you are still choosing evil” and the Democrat primary provides a perfect illustration of this.? For althought Homobama was correct in his assessment of “Mrs.” Clinton, he himself is a demon from the bowels of Hell.? How else could he indentify the monsterousness of “Mrs.” Clinton?

And now we have new evidence that not only is Homobama a gay crackhead but that he may, in fact, be a voodoo priest.? Our new friend and collegue, Dana, who first alerted us to Homobama’s double life on the “low down” recently stumbled across this information and before the following post was finished was found slumped over the computer in a “sleep trance”.? Dana, I am told of this writing, has not yet come out of this “sleep trance”.? We thank her friend, Hunter, for allowing us to fully quote this post in the hope that others will spread the word of this nefarious negro voodoo priest that, if elected?will plunge this country into zombie servitude!

Yours In Christ
Newton Wilcox
Board of Directors
Shelley The Republican

[Hi, my name is Hunter. I am publishing this unfinished post for reasons that should be obvious. This afternoon I went to visit Dana and found Dana slumped over the keyboard in what appeared to be a deep sleep. After trying unsuccessfully to wake Dana, I called the ambulance. They took Dana to the emergency room where the doctors could find nothing physically wrong. "It's like Dana is in a trance," were their exact words.

When I came home, I read the post Dana had been writing. Dana is only interested in finding the truth, so I will not add my suspicions that Barack HUSSEIN Obama is behind this. I hope you will include Dana in your prayers.]

It’s a going to be SO HARD to get the truth out about the negro Obama! It’s a thankless task trying to CONVINCE PEOPLE OF THE TRUTH when they JUST DON’T WANT TO HEAR IT. First the MSM is trying deny that Larry Sinclair BLEW OBAMA IN A LIMO while OBAMA SMOKED CRACK. Only a handful of Americans are really INTERESTED IN THE TRUTH enough to honestly follow where the evidence leads them. Everybody else wants to just SLAM LARRY as some homo on the VERGE OF DEATH making things up just for a last BRUSH WITH FAME. But it’s not true!! Larry Sinclair truly did blow Barack Obama in the back of a limo and he doesn’t need to prove something that ACTUALLY HAPPENED!!

Even more troubling is a story coming out that a gay priest that Larry spoke to is NOW DEAD BECAUSE SOMEONE KILLED HIM. We don’t know a lot about what happened but we DO KNOW THAT HE SPOKE TO LARRY AND NOW HE’S DEAD. Does the MSM care about this? Of course, they don’t! Should they? Of course, they should!! They owe it to the American people to find out if Barack HUSSEIN Obama is killing anyone who talks to Larry Sinclair. We do not need ANOTHER MUDEROUS PRESIDENT LIKE CLINTON. Americans are still trying to shake off the shame of the Clinton years and for us to elect a gay negro crackhead is JUST NOT GOING TO HELP THAT. But instead, they’re so in love with Obama that he can KILL PEOPLE AT WILL and they’ll let it slide because he’s rigged a bunch of elections.

Now some of the places that have led the fight are starting to suddenly go soft on the fact that OBAMA IS A MURDEROUS GAY NEGRO CRACKHEAD. Especially the site BIG HEAD DC that up until now lead the charge to make sure that a negro would NOT BE PRESIDENT. I’ve been VERY, VERY ACTIVE over there offering all the support I can and then suddenly they seemed to back off the story. They have not put a new post up about the MURDEROUS GAY NEGRO CRACKHEAD in 24 hours! And why??? I’M PRETTY SURE I KNOW!!!

It’s because Barack Obama is a VOODOO PRIEST!!! This is very plausible and the only way it makes sense. How else could such a public figure get away with the crimes that he is getting away with UNLESS HE WAS INVOLVED IN VOODOO!!??

Think about this - if you google “barack obama is a high level voodoo priest that does ritual sacrifices to kill his enemies” guess how many hits you get - NONE!!! Doesn’t that set off some warning bells in your head? If people who can tell the truth about someone are dying off left and right and that someone is mysteriously not in the neighborhood when those people die, WHAT CHOICES DO YOU HAVE??!!

I am currently booking a trip to Chicago in order to INVESTIGATE THIS MYSELF! This story is going to blow the top of this FAKEY-FAKE BARACK HUS

?I get some of the best information from folks who forward stuff on to me.? For instance, if hadn’t been for a fowarded email, I never woulda known that Homobama was not only a gay crackhead but a towelhead, too!? It always makes me feel real good to know that folk is thinking about me.

This came from my dear friend Mrs. TD Crockett-Gaines over at Baptists for Republican Faith who says that she read it at Free Larry Sinclair and felt so moved that she sent to to all 13,382 of her contacts.? I’m thinking y’all are probably gonna wanna do the same thing.? I been told that you ain’t breaking copyright if you do it so I hope you will!

God is Love!
BBN
www.billybobneck.com

I am so relieved that some of these dumbo-crats and nigger lovers are leaving poor Larry alone.? I can IMAGINE having to sit day after day in horrible cramped apartment not daring to go out even for a breath of fresh air because you’re afraid of some OBAMA ASSASSIN with a? sniper rifle aimed right at your head and itching to? PULL THE TRIGGER.? That’s why the call it the culture of death,? people, because all they want to do is KILL, KILL, KILL!? Except for niggers, of course, THOSE we elect president of the United States so that they can turn the WHITE HOUSE into a CRACK HOUSE.

Uh-oh!? Did I say something WRONG!?? Did I use a BAD WORD!?? I’m sorry, you little PANTYWASTES!? I DIDN’T MEAN TO SAY UNITED STATES!!? I know that offends so many people when you talk about the land of the FREE and the home of the BRAVE where the sun never sets on the TRUTH!? I DO beg your pardon for loving my country and wanting to protect it from foreign invasion by EVIL HORDES OF MUSLIMS!!? I know you’d rather elect a FILTHY MUSLIM who will leave the door WIDE OPEN for all the other DIRTY TOWELHEADS to invade our shores, rape our children and force us ALL to bow to MECCA at the point of a gun while PRETENDING THIS ALLAH IDIOT ACTUALLY EXISTS.? And that why all you PROBAMA BUTTHOLES want to rip down one of the finest, bravest, honest Americans to come down the pike since George Wallace!!

I know that it’s disgusting that Larry PUT HIS MOUTH on a negro’s penis and possibly took its cargo inside of him on more than one occasion.? Larry was SOUL SICK!!? He didn’t WANT TO DO IT.? When the PROBAMA haters talk about the MENTAL ILLNESS that Larry had (and that is in the PAST TENSE) they’re not talking about any of these made-up fake mental illness that liberals use to excuse sin or get out of day a full days work - Larry had (and that is in the PAST TENSE) the VERY REAL mental illness of FAGGOTRY coupled with MISCEGENATION!!? Either of these is enough to make a DECENT PERSON THROW UP but for Larry to have engaged in BOTH AT THE SAME TIME is almost too much to bear.? Frankly, it’s hard to believe that he was able to pull back from that and become a NORMAL AMERICAN like you or I but that is why he is FIGHTING SO HARD as a way to apologize to ALL AMERICA for his almost unforgivable past behavior.

But like OUR PRESIDENT says - you can’t live in the past.? Larry is DOING HIS DARNDEST to feel like he can once again walk tall in America and not feel like the second or third class citizen that HE MOST CERTAINLY WAS.? He wants to turn his life around and was well on the way to doing it until the MAIN STREAM MEDIA brought its great big JACK BOOT down to try and crush Larry’s dreams.? But Larry’s dreams are UNCRUSHABLE!!? Even though Larry presented them with AIR TIGHT EVIDENCE that they DID NOT QUESTION they still refused to air THE MOST IMPORTANT STORY IN THE HISTORY OF AMERICA.? We still don’t know why but I’m pretty sure I know the answer because once I went to the video store and it seemed like every single video I picked out and brought to the counter HAD GOTTEN LOST OR DAMAGED.? ALL THREE VERSIONS of A Star Is Born, Meet Me In St. Louis, Pillow Talk and The Three Faces of Eve were UNAVAILABLE.? Instead, the boy behind the counter (I think his name was Chet) told me that I should watch a movie called Boison Hood.? He couldn’t really tell me much about it but he thought it was about IDAHO.? Well, IT WASN’T.? It was all about NIGGERS KILLING EACH OTHER.? I watched less than an hour of it before I had to turn it off, but let me tell you something, IT CONFIRMED ALL OF MY SUSPICIONS.? It would not surprise my in the least if the MSM refuses to EXPOSE HOMOBAMA for his own FAGGOTRY because they’re too afraid that the niggers will “cop on their a**”.? We ALL KNOW that they are still TRIBAL and they’ve probably made Obama their CHIEF VOODOO GOD so they have to do whatever he says - INCLUDING SUPPRESION OF THE TRUTH - or he’ll shrink they’re heads.

I know that Larry will prevail!!? Even now he’s canceled all of his media interviews in order to FOCUS ON THE TASK AT HAND which is GETTING HIS EVIDENCE TO THE MEDIA. ?? He will not be silenced or intimidated or pushed around by these jigaboos. ? Do you think that Larry Sinclair scares EASILY!!!? If you think he does then YOU DON’T KNOW LARRY SINCLAIR!

FORWARD THIS POST ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW BECAUSE AMERICA NEEDS HIS SUPPORT OR ELSE ALL US WILL BE SHOT BY MUSLIMS!!!!!!!!!?

More and more homosexuals are coming forward and claiming to had have anal and oral sex (in that order) with Senator and presidential hopeful Barack Hussein Osama.

Senator Obama yet has to discredit these serious allegations. What we know so far is the following:

Obama admitted to have taken serious drugs on several occasions. How do we know he is clean right now or that he will be in the future? Maybe he just wants to be president so he can buy more drugs!

Apparently Obama had gay sex. Do we want another sex offender in the oval office?

Obama is Anti-Life. How can we elect the child-killer to the highest office?

There are also serious questions regarding Obama’s true allegiance. Will he try to re