STR † THE FREEDOM BLOG©

Friends,

Do you ever wonder if liberal minded bible translators have corrupted the Holy word of Jesus? Shelley The Republican. It’s true that the Bible is the word of the LORD, however how do we know that his sacred word has not been tainted by liberalism and socialism?

Phylis Shlafly of Conservapedia has been asking exactly this question and has found some astonishing answers:

Socialistic terminology permeates English translations of the Bible, without justification. This improperly encourages the “social justice” movement among Christians. For example, the conservative word “volunteer” is mentioned only once in the ESV, yet the socialistic word “comrade” is used three times, “laborer(s)” is used 13 times, “labored” 15 times, and “fellow” (as in “fellow worker”) is used 55 times.

Isn’t that disgusting? Can you believe that socialists have been deliberately mis-translating the HOLY BIBLE in order to force their perverse anti-Christian agenda on every single American? That is why Shelley The Republican has joined forces with Conservapedia to produce an all-new translation of the bible which will be 100% conservative just as Jesus intended.

1. Framework against Liberal Bias: providing a strong framework that enables a thought-for-thought translation without corruption by liberal bias
2. Not Emasculated: avoiding unisex, “gender inclusive” language, and other modern emasculation of Christianity
3. Not Dumbed Down: not dumbing down the reading level, or diluting the intellectual force and logic of Christianity; the NIV is written at only the 7th grade level
4. Utilize Powerful Conservative Terms: using powerful new conservative terms as they develop;[4] defective translations use the word “comrade” three times as often as “volunteer”; similarly, updating words which have a change in meaning, such as “word”, “peace”, and “miracle”.
5. Combat Harmful Addiction: combating addiction by using modern terms for it, such as “gamble” rather than “cast lots”;[5] using modern political terms, such as “register” rather than “enroll” for the census
6. Accept the Logic of Hell: applying logic with its full force and effect, as in not denying or downplaying the very real existence of Hell or the Devil.
7. Express Free Market Parables; explaining the numerous economic parables with their full free-market meaning
8. Credit Open-Mindedness of Disciples: crediting open-mindedness, often found in youngsters like the eyewitnesses Mark and John, the authors of two of the Gospels
9. Prefer Conciseness over Liberal Wordiness: preferring conciseness to the liberal style of high word-to-substance ratio; avoid compound negatives and unnecessary ambiguities; prefer concise, consistent use of the word “Lord” rather than “Jehovah” or “Yahweh” or “Lord God.”
10. Exclude Later-Inserted Liberal Passages: excluding the later-inserted liberal passages that are not authentic, such as the adulteress story

Of course, liberals will object to this common-sense purification of the Bible, but the act of objection will force them to read their Bibles and that will open their minds.

Yours in Christ,

Jimmy Goddard

This insightful article by our guest-blogger John L. Perry is re-printed by kind permission of NewsMax.com, who (apart from WorlNetDaily) are my number one source of un-biased news. Perry, an award winning journalist an political scientist explores the likely outcome of the Obama administration’s chronic mismanagement. The only thing that can save America from Obama is a military coup:

There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America’s military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the “Obama problem.” Don’t dismiss it as unrealistic. America isn’t the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn’t mean it wont. I would never seek to advocate a military revolt, however let us examine this issue through the eyes of a high-ranking Christ-warrior in the military:

• Officers swear to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to “obey the orders of the president of the United States.”
• Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized.
• They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office.
• They can see that the economy — ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation — is financially reliant on foreign lender governments.
• They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home.
• They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America’s troop strength is allowed to sag.
• They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.
• They can see the nation’s safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before.
• They can see Obama trying to make Islam into the state religion instead of Christianity as the framers of the constitution intended.

So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you do? Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan’s arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam? Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran’s nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World?

What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, “I’m not interested in victory”) that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse?

Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims?

Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the intellect and conscience of America’s military leadership is lost in a fool’s fog.

Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a “family intervention,” with some form of limited, shared responsibility?

Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making. Such people could bring peace and propserity back to America just as the previous President brought it to Iraq.

Military intervention is what Obama’s exponentially accelerating agenda for “fundamental change” toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama’s radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible. Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don’t shrug and say, “We can always worry about that later.”.

In the 2008 election, that was the wistful, self-indulgent, indifferent reliance on abnegation of personal responsibility that has sunk the nation into this morass.

We at Shelley The Republican fully endorse John L. Perry’s sensible position on this matter. Like perry we are in no way seeking to encourage military officers to revolt against the tyrany of Obama, however if God should instruct our brave military leaders to rise up and strike down this unholy government which not only hates Jesus and America, but also the very idea of freedom… in that case we and all true Patriots would not stand in their way.

Yours in Christ,

Jimmy Goddard

Shelley N. Goodman: http://www.facebook.com/ShelleyTheRepublican

Jimmy Goddard: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000089709799

Charles Roast: http://www.facebook.com/chuckroast

Billy Bob Neck: http://www.facebook.com/billybobneck

Sam Johnston: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=585892966

Newton Wilcox: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=587238512

My fellow Christians,

America has grown strong on Christian values. We are a great nation built on the foundation of a single pure faith. With God on our side we will be undefeated, but unfortunately there is an element within our society who hates America and our cherished values.

Sarah Palin will be leading us in parayer: Jesus help protect this God-given land from the people who hate you and reject your message.

I believe Sarah Palin said it best when she stated the plain truth that there are parts of America which are Anti-American. There are entire communities that reject God’s values and embrace those of Satan: They permit the sins of homosexuality and terrorism within our own sacred borders. We at Shelley’s blog are compassionate conservatives, and that is why we do not blame every liberal American for their misguided and foolish ways: It is obvious that they have been mislead by a cabal of left-wingers. If these people could be removed from their positions of influence then America would once again be free of Sin, just as our Christian founding-fathers intended.

We at Shelley The Republican have compiled a list of the people who hate American values the most. It’s not so much our list, but God’s list – he tells us what to write and we write it: A list of people who hate God and fight against the teachings of Jesus Christ and the Holy words of the Bible. If you find this list offensive, please do not blame us – God revealed this information to us so take your foolish atheistic liberal complaints to the Jesus.

Since STR was founded our loyal readers have repeatedly volunteered to pray for the end of God’s enemies: We won big-time. Amongst the sinners that God decided to send to Hell were Saddam Hussein and Kurt Vonnegut. See what prayer can accomplish?

Saddam Hussein: Your prayers helped kill him

Unfortunately Satan is at work and our list of God’s enemies is growing. It seems like almost every week that we are forced to add a name to this shameful list.

If we had not been praying for his death this atheistic troublemaker might have continued writing for years to come. Thank you Jesus for putting an end to his life.

America still needs your help: Of the many names on God’s hit-list the vast majority of them are still active, spreading their evil perversions. If you know any of these people we urge you to call upon them to repent from their sins, but failing that God tells us that we must pray for them to be brought to Holy justice.

Yours in Christ,

Jimmy Goddard

.

Dear Lord,

The American Holocaust is still going on. Abortion is still legal in America. We pray in Jesus’ name that you will find it in your heart to forgive us, O’Lord.

Real American are fighting every day to stop abortion but liberals go on killing your creation every day.

50 Million (50,000,000) Americans have been killed so far.

Please forgive them because they are blinded by liberal hatred against life. Please support us in our war against the American Holocaust.

Amen

Facts about Late Term Abortion

• Late term abortions are legal in most states. “Late Term” means that an abortion can be done up to the moment of birth. This means that a birth is being induced and in the act of birth the baby is being killed.
• Some late term abortions are being done by putting a salt-acid mixture into the baby’s lungs so that the child suffocates.
• In case of a failed late term abortions, means that if the child is BORN ALIVE, the “doctor” will often kill the crying (LIVING) baby. The act of killing is often been done by drowning the struggling child in a bowl of water. Sometimes the baby will be just strangled to death or it’s head is being cut off.
• The remains of the child will be thrown in the trash or the corps will be used for medical testings.

• INFANTICIDE – The following issues have been raised in order to get you to think more critically about infanticide and why infanticide would be an acceptable form of family planning among the majority of pre-industrial societies. It is normal for people in one society to judge the behavior of people in other societies in terms of the moral values of their own society. This is, in fact, the very definition of ethnocentrism. However, many issues can be raised regarding a variety of methods of family planning that place the practice of infanticide within a broader anthropological perspective.

• Most Americans would consider infanticide to be morally wrong. However, infanticide is widely practiced throughout the world. Is infanticide necessarily immoral and, if so, is it universally wrong? By what criteria do we make that determination, and do those criteria distinguish unambiguously between abortion, which is legal in our society, and infanticide which is not, but which is accepted and practiced in other societies?
• Abortion is legal and is accepted by the majority of the American population as morally correct. Why is abortion an acceptable method of family planning in the U.S., but not infanticide? To what extent are we, by accepting abortion and rejecting infanticide, defining one method of terminating a human life as morally acceptable while condemning another form as morally unacceptable? If infanticide is practiced by peoples who do not have access to abortion technology, can they be considered morally wrong for terminating a human life by the best means they have available to them while accepting our method of terminating a life because we possess the technological means to end that life before birth?
• How does the fact that our own society’s stand on both the legality and morality of abortion has changed radically in the past 30 years affect our certainty regarding the immorality of infanticide? Isn’t it quite possible that future generations may come to accept infanticide as a reasonable method of family planning, just as we now accept abortion and increasingly accept euthanasia and doctor-assisted suicide –practices which would have resulted in a doctor’s losing his or her license to practice medicine a mere 10 years ago?
• Steven Pinker, in his article, “Why They Kill Their Newborns”, distinguishes between neonaticide and the killing of older children (filicide). He shows that, while our own society condemns infanticide, we are, in fact, quite tolerant of those who kill newly born children. He reports that of nearly 300 women charged with neonaticide in the U.S., not one spent more than a night in jail. The general population was much more willing to deal leniently, for example, with the Grossberg-Peterson case involving the killing of a newborn than they were with the case of Susan Smith, who killed her two sons: one 14 months old, and the other 3 year old.
• Our notion that infanticide is committed by disturbed individuals is also not supported by research. First of all, women who practice neonaticide generally go on to become loving supportive mothers when they do have and raise children (as do mothers who have had abortions), in contrast to those women who kill older children. Secondly, as Pinker states, “it’s hard to maintain that neonaticide is an illness when we learn that it has been practiced and accepted in most cultures throughout history.” That many societies practice infanticide is clearly illustrated by the articles in the Infanticide packet.
• The acceptance of abortion but not infanticide in the U.S. has been justified on the grounds that a baby is alive while a fetus is not. When does a human life begin? How do we define life? In the article referred to above, Steven Pinker discusses how difficult it is to determine when a human organism becomes a person with a right to life. Conception, birth, the end of the second trimester are all rather arbitrary definition points for when a human organism becomes a person. Viability is also problematic, given that the human infant cannot survive on its own for several years after its birth and that many infants cannot survive at all without medical intervention, to say nothing of large numbers of the elderly. Furthermore, infant viability is a matter of degree and is clearly much less developed in humans than in most other mammals. Given the difficulty of establishing clear objective criteria for when personhood is achieved –in some societies “personhood” is not conferred until well after birth– on what grounds do we claim that one point in the human organism’s development is more valid and objective (i.e., less arbitrary) for establishing “personhood” and, thus, a right to life than any other point? If the definition of “personhood” is largely socially determined, to what extent is the criteria used for defining “personhood” in our own society any more objective and valid than that used in other societies? How does the controversy over when an abortion is acceptably performed in the U.S. affect our understanding of the social basis of our society’s definition of when life begins? What factors determine who is likely to accept Pinker’s definition and who is likely to reject it? How does their stand on the issue reflect their personal interests rather than an objective scientific look at the issue? Furthermore, when we set arbitrary boundaries as our defining points for the beginning of life, to what extent do we inadvertently kill human organisms that develop more quickly than the established norm? Finally, why is “personhood” used to determine when a human organism is alive rather than some less subjective critria? If we don’t use “doghood” or “cathood” to determine when dogs and cats are alive, are we being logically inconsistent to use “personhood” to determine when humans are alive? Is there a uniform, objective biological definition for the beginning of life that can be applied systematically to all living organisms, including dogs, cats and humans?
• Most biology textbooks define life as possessing the following characteristics: Cells, energy, heredity, reproduction and responsiveness to the environment. All living things are composed of cells. Even such microscopic unicellular organisms as bacteria are considered alive. All living things also acquire and use energy to maintain metabolism. All living organisms also possess DNA organized into genes and chromosomes which form the blueprint for how that organism will develop and grow. Similarly, all living organisms are potentially capable of reproduction. Being able to reproduce offspring which share their genetic material, living organisms (unlike non-living matter) are able to cause the transfer of genetic information from one generation to the next. Finally, living organisms are responsive to their environments. That is, they are affected by their environments and attempt to adapt to those environments. Are these characteristics, which are presented as distinguishing living organisms in nearly every biology textbook written, less applicable to a fetus than to a baby or a young child, to an invalid or an octogenarian, or for that matter to any human being? (Would they also apply to both the sperm and the unfertilized egg? The Roman Catholic Church maintains that they do, which is why it opposed artificial birth control.) If so, then on what logical or scientific grounds is it determined that a baby or a child is alive but not a fetus? What does this say about our society’s support of abortion but not infanticide? Is it logically consistent? And if it is not, then why is it so widely accepted?

  The definition of when life begins has changed radically in the U.S. during the past 40 years. To what extent has the definition of when life begins changed because newer definitions serve the changing interests of the individuals or political groups doing the defining? To what extent is the changing definition of life and the recourse to such concepts as “personhood” a function of the pivotal role that the abortion issue plays in American politics? Proponents of abortion in the U.S. refer to abortion as a “right” and challenge any qualification on a woman’s “right to choose”. Any factor that threatens that “right” is vigorously opposed, including mandatory waiting periods and parental notification laws. To what extent might the application of an objective interspecies definition of life to humans in general and to fetuses in particular, also be perceived as a threat by those who want to promote abortion as their “right”? A recent article in The Economist titled “The War That Never Ends” (June 13, 2003) examined the abortion issue in the U.S. at the 25th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade. The article distinguished between the continuing controversy over abortion in the U.S. and its general acceptance in Europe, including in such predominantly Roman Catholic countries as France, Spain and Italy. The article viewed the problem this way.

There’s a lotta grumblers about how Larry Sinclair ain’t done nothing but say the same thing over and over and over and over again without showing no proof.  Well that also changed today and like with everything that’s GOOD in this world, it took Christians to make it happen.  America’s Hope Foundation, one of the leading hope foundations in this great country of ours stepped up to the plate and released an radio ad today that gonna break this thing WIDE OPEN!  No longer will the Lame Scream Media be able to shirk their responsibility of proving that Barack Osama Homo bin Laden is a murdereous, gay, left-handed negro crackhead Muslim voodoo priest!  No longer will they not be able to NOT attend his press conferences to accept the answers that he gives them as true!  No longer will Sen. Joseph Biden and his son be able to conduct of a campaign of political terror passing bills that pertain ONLY to Larry Sinclair!  The burden of proving this was NEVER supposed to be on Larry Sinclair.  That ain’t the way it works!

It’s morning in America once again, folks!  For the first time I can feel really proud of my country for doing the right thing and exposing a out and out hypocrite and America hater.  In putting this ad out to a dozen or so radio stations spread out around in Virginia, Colorado, Florida and Nevada, I think we finally see the final nail in the coffin of Barack Osama Homo bin Laden!!

And to all them doubters and hateful people that never thought he wouldn’t prove and who kept whining about having to wait seven months for him to show any proof – well, we had to wait three days for Jesus to come back and it was worth the wait!  And so is this!

I want every single person reading this to call America’s Hope Foundation at (800) 530-5106 and thank them personally for having the guts and courage to tell the truth about Barack Osama Homo bin Laden!

God is Love!
BBN

Dear Friends:
As we all know, our Lord and Savior will come down from Heaven to save mankind. Surely he will come to the USA first, since this is God’s chosen country. Therefore to give him legal status in America we need to grant him the US-Citizenship!
We can not let him walk around as illegal immigrant and possible be arrested by overeager officers of the department of ‘US Citizenship and Immigration Services’!

I suspect that many of my dear visitors will again suspect that this article is satirical, but I can assure you this is not the case. Whatever you believe, please consider signing this PETITION!

Dear Friends, thank you very much for all your support.

Yours sincerely,
Shelley Goodman

Picture Source: Villagevoice.com

Good evening, fellow Christians,

It becomes readily apparent that Satan’s hoary claws sunk farther into the Presidential primary season than anyone could have predicted.? It is with much regret that we find ourselves heading toward the conclusion (not yet reached) that our Republican party, once a bastion of morality and the only safe haven for Christians, teeters on the brink of complete moral and theological annihilation.? We find ourselves asking a question as coarse as it is disturbing – have the spiritual leaders of our party sold their souls to the Prince of Darkness?

Pat Robertson, whose words and reputation once rang out like those of Moses throughout this great land of ours, has seemingly whored himself to the cross-dressing, homosexual-loving pre-born killer, Rudolph Giuliani.? We can only drop to our knees and ask the Lord why Pat Robertson, whose courage, wisdom and faith in God the Father led him to the unassailable truth that God brought down 9/11 to punish America, would endorse a candidate who worships the anti-Christ Pope.

We ask the Lord why Bob Jones, with whom we trusted the strict moral education of our young people with the goal of re-creating the Christian nation the founding father sets out to build, endorses a candidate that believes Jesus is the half-brother of Satan and that God physically copulated with Mary to bring about His birth.

We ask the Lord why, when He spoke to the nation at Janet Folger’s Values Voter debate, Paul Weyrich turned his back on God and also endorsed a man whose religion believes in six-foot tall moonment that dress as Quakers.

We wonder if Dr. James Dobson will now come out in favor of Ron Paul or even Hillary Rodham Clinton!? At this dark hour of American Christianity, it would not surprise us in the least.?

Our now disgraced leaders?talk to us of pragmatism.? They speak to us of “poll numbers”.? They hold over our heads the specter of Hillary Rodham Clinton seducing interns in the?Oval Office and mandating abortions for all Federal?workers.? Of Barak Obama staining the President’s desk with?fried chicken grease and watermelon rinds and?making Islam the national religion.? While these real, tangible threats hang like sulphur in the air, something else hangs in the air that presents a far danger to America and the world.

That something is God’s Wrath and he will send the non-believers and the deal-makers and the pragmatists to a circle of Hell newly created for them.? Perhaps it will be called the 700th circle of Hell in honor of Pat Robertson.? You can almost hear Satan laughing demonically as he wait patiently to drag another Christian leader into the bowels of Hell.

Every Christian needs to understand with the depth that they understand that Jesus Christ died for our sins so that we may have everlasting life that if you vote for the lesser of two evils you are still voting for evil.

And God will send you to Hell along with the minions of Satan you voted for.

Therefore – We ask all Christians to pray for the souls of Pat Robertson, Bob Jones and Paul Weyrich and pray that they renounce Satan and return to God.? Our 501C3 status does not allow us to endorse specific candidates but God has already revealed His choice.

Praise be His name!

Newton Wilcox
Board of Directors
Shelley The Republican

Howdy!

I just wanted y’all to know that Billy Bob Neck’s Hour Of Bein’ Good is going back to it old time slot of 11am – Noon on Thursdays starting today.

You can listen to it live on www.wmfo.org and get the GodCast on iTunes.

God is Love!
BBN
www.billybobneck.com

Friends

Hateful lie-berals are attacking our Godly blog once more. We need to fight back and let them know that God don’t like it!

Please click the buttons below and make sure we win at least!

God bless you,
Shelley N. Goodman

Those responsible oughta know better than to fight against God.? Shame on them!

Ladies and Gentlemen,

It has recently come to our attention and the attention of our lawyers, that this person recently stole one of our posts and claimed it as his own.? This blatant and casual theft of Sam Johnston’s hard work stands as affront to every single person whom God granted the gift of fingers to type and a brain to think.?

When Mr. Johnston first brought this purloined post, the board initially chided him and reminded him of Phillipians 2:3-7

?3Let nothing be done through strife or vainglory; but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves.

4Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others.

5Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:

6Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:

7But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:?

Humility is a virtue that we must always strife for.? After a brief conference, even Mr. Johnston agreed that this foul, dung-eating miscreant would find a more just punishment in the fiery bowels of Hell than in legal action brought against him.

However, with but a few minute of investigation, it was found that Mr. Johnston’s post was not the only one stolen.? Indeed,? this worthless cipher of a human being? had pinched every single word “written” in his so-called “blog”.? Every “post”was pilfered to the point where he copied an entire post in French.? (Time does not permit me to do justice to the unfathomable wickedness of posting a French article on an American website.)? We, of course, tasked one of our interns to track down the authors of the each of the plundered posts and alert them to the theft.

Thus, the board agreed to exposed this thief and plagiarist in the hopes that his comeuppance might be sped along by the readers of STR.?

Whether you are a faithful soldier of Christ or foul, amoral and soulless sinner, we, with great humility, ask those with a myspace account to request association with this miserable mental invertebrate and inform him that stealing, whether it be words, wealth or kisses from someone you are not married to under the sight of God, is sinful and wrong.? We would also request that you forward this message to any and all that view the non-sanctioned theft of ideas as immoral and worthy of retribution.

God will, of course, prevail in the end.? It is the recommendation of the Board that a taste of his inevitable Hell be afforded early to him.

Pastor Wiley Drake of First Southern Baptist Church, Buena Park has asked us to unite with him in prayer against a common enemy that has done much to undermine America’s Christian values: “Americans United for Separation of Church and State” (AU) are a notorious gang whose mission statement includes the desire to eliminate prayer from school and to prevent court-houses from honoring the Bible, which as we all know is the foundation of our law.

AU also despise the idea of free-speech, as can be seen by this disturbing news article:

Hours after Washington, D.C.-based Americans United for Separation of Church and State accused Wiley Drake of illegal electioneering for his use of church letterhead to write an endorsement for Republican Mike Huckabee, he responded with a prayer for the demise of Americans United staff members, the group said. “In light of the recent attack from the enemies of God I ask the children of God to go into action with Imprecatory Prayer,” Drake said in his statement, according to the watchdog group. Drake went on to single out two of the group’s staff members, including communications director Joe Conn, the group said.

And what did our brother in Christ Pastor Wiley do to deserve threats from AU? He merely exercised his right to freedom of speech. In a limited internal press release, he explained his belief that God wants us to elect a Christian president, like Bush, Brownback or Huckabee.

Friend of STR, Pastor Wiley Drake bravely speaks up for George W. Bush. How could supporting our Presidency at a time of war be considered a “political” statement? Liberals demand that only treasonous organizations should be tax-exempt.

In response to the moonbat outcry Drake issued another press release, calling on his allies to make ?imprecatory? prayers against the people who are damaging America’s values:

In light of the recent attack from the enemies of God I ask the children of God to go into action with Imprecatory Prayer. Especially against Americans United for Separation of Church and State. I made an attempt to go to them via Matt 18:15 but they refused to talk to me. Specifically target Joe Conn or Jeremy Learing. They are those who lead the attack.

Imprecatory prayer, is now our duty
Now that all efforts have been exhausted, we must begin our Imprecatory Prayer, at the key points of the parliamentary role in the earth where we live.

DEAR FATHER

By the Holy Blood of Christ who suffered unbearable agony and died for our sins on the Cross

We ask you to smite Americans United for Separation of Church and State and send them to the deepest, darkest pit of Hell

Let them experience pain and torment the likes of which would make the Devil himself cry out in desperation for mercy

For they conspire to keep You out of government

They conspire to keep You out of schools

They wish to keep You out of our hospitals and court-houses.

Shower down up these dangerous, deceitful and depraved fanatics hellfire and brimstone not seen since the days of Sodom

And by their suffering let it serve as a warning to all those who dare speak against Your HOLY name.

AMEN

Update: Looks like we were beat to this story by those Brownback supporters again.