Comments on: A winterval carol

By: concerned brit

concerned brit — Sun, 02 Nov 2008 01:08:43 +0000

it waseth the year 2008 and the fat oaf shelley and her desperate lies would continue… iowa would be a blue state and she wouldeth make desperate claims of obama being a voodoo priest him being-eth hitler and thoueth being a master-eth hypnotist.. and still the fat bitches lies would continue into the obama years of 2009 onward

By: Her Excellency

Her Excellency — Wed, 07 May 2008 23:41:03 +0000

“But when they persisted in asking Him, He straightened up, and said to them, “He who is without sin among you, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.”
John 8:7

By: Abbie Kaufman

Abbie Kaufman — Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:26:55 +0000

@Journey to “Truth”, Islam isn’t the only religion with terrorists and other violent radicals in it! How about the Christian Falangists in Lebanon who massacred Lebanese civilians and Palestinian refugees on June 6,1982? Or other terrorists and violent radicals who call themselves Christians such as the Army of God,Church of Jesus Christ Christian(Aryan Nations) or the war- crazed beliefs of Christian Zionists? All these people claim to “accept” Jesus Christ, the Prince of Peace! And before you accuse me of just picking on Christians,let’s not forget the Stern Gang and the Jewish Defense League! I imagine there were some members of these groups who thought they were “doing God’s will” too! Here’s some more food for thought: “Infamous Hall of Christian Terrorist Organizations of the World” http://www.tentmaker.org/articles/christian_terrorist_organizations.htm

By: Journey to Truth

Journey to Truth — Thu, 27 Dec 2007 00:30:08 +0000

“That is a good point, thanks for the correction. I agree with you. (although I still think life would go on without belief in Jesus).”

No matter how basic your belief may be- if only recognizing Jesus as a prophet- better find some way to accept Him! I could be an Islamist Terrorist and recognize Jesus as a messenger from God.

You people are “dull sport” for any thinking human- what happened? Did your piss-bag get plugged up?

By: Link48010

Link48010 — Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:44:52 +0000

“It?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢s the modern-day Pharisees who claim to be members of His fan club! They?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢re type of people He warned us about!”

That is a good point, thanks for the correction. I agree with you. (although I still think life would go on without belief in Jesus).

By: Abbie Kaufman

Abbie Kaufman — Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:04:27 +0000

@link, I beg to differ! It isn’t Christ that needs to be stamped out,nor is He bad for America! It’s the modern-day Pharisees who claim to be members of His fan club! They’re type of people He warned us about!

By: William Milton

William Milton — Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:38:52 +0000

If you compare the 10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto to our current government,you’d discover that the US government is over 50% of the way towards fulfilling the 10 planks! “Wake Up America! – America — Capitalist or Communist?” http://www.buildfreedom.com/tl/wua11.shtml

By: Link48010

Link48010 — Wed, 26 Dec 2007 04:35:15 +0000

http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m174/link48010/Capture-4.jpg

That’s about where I expected I’d test out.

By: Link48010

Link48010 — Wed, 26 Dec 2007 04:29:10 +0000

?¢‚Ç¨?ìChrist is bad for America! We must stamp out Christ!?¢‚Ç¨¬ù Hillary Clinton campaign speech, May 2008.”

…I doubt it. Even though I do agree with the quote.

“i have lost all motivation to skewer this post. Link, Wraith, LeftTurn, ProudGerman, RandomAussie?¢‚Ç¨¬¶have a great holiday. and good hunting”

Thanks, and same to you XD.

By: William Milton

William Milton — Wed, 26 Dec 2007 03:44:29 +0000

@LeftTurn, according to the political compass, and the World’s Smallest Quiz http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html I’m right-libertarian. — Hitler,lke Mussolini was a corporatist,a marriage of big government and big business. Corporate welfare,government works programs etc. for Aryans only. A watered-down,race-based form of socialism. The lines blur economically in the case of fascism,aka corporatism as the following article explains: “Corporatism and Socialism in America” by Anthony Gregory http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0411e.asp @Journey, My basic point was ECONOMICALLY,not politically there are political philosophies further to the right(paleo-conservatism,objectivism,right libertarianism,anarcho-capitalism) than National Socialism and fascism which means fascism and National Socialism are not ECONOMICALLY to the farthest right! Fascists are to at least some small degree socialists, not laissez-faire capitalists,after all! Neo-conservative Republican social policies are also ECONOMICALLY further to to the left than paleo-conservative Republicans in government long ago! Even Democratic President JFK was fiscally more conservative than our current President George W. Bush!

By: Journey to Truth

Journey to Truth — Tue, 25 Dec 2007 23:32:43 +0000

DUNCES! You can’t even distinguish Left from Right! All communism is LEFT-WING, whether it has a totalitarian goverment or not. The same is true of Nazism (fascism)- it’s RIGHT-WING bunnies- even when it is totalitarian like Hitler.

By: LeftTurn

LeftTurn — Tue, 25 Dec 2007 21:31:29 +0000

“@LeftTurn, After advocating that the workers usurp the means of production,Karl Marx did advocate a ?¢‚Ç¨?ìDictatorship of the Proletariat?¢‚Ç¨¬ù,albeit temporarily.You?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢re getting into semantics because I didn?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t go into details.”

No, that’s what I said. The key word being a temporary dictatorship, for economic, rather than political purposes.

“I?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢m confused as to what you mean about Mao. How was Mao, a Communist dictator not left-wing in any practical way? Maybe I don?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t understand exactly what you mean by ?¢‚Ç¨?ìpractical?¢‚Ç¨¬ù!”

Well, it might be more a matter of opinion, but when Mao took the helm, the CCP put the iron gauntlet on so fast, . While Stalin may have been initially driven by the Communist vision, Mao never shared any allegiance to his party’s ideology, and practiced Communism by immaterial preaching only (in the entirety of his Little Red Book, only two passages are devoted specifically to working-class citizens). While Stalinist Russia was technically collective, Maoist China was pure give-and-take (and Mao took the most).
Once again, this is more a matter of opinion: by the same logic, I could argue that Stalin wasn’t left-wing.

“I once read years ago an op-ed piece in a socialist newpaper claiming that National Socialism(Nazism) wasn?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t really socialism! I think it was merely a case of the author disowning a racist brand of socialist philosophy that didn?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t fit into his multicultural, egalitarian ?¢‚Ç¨?ìsocialism with a human face?¢‚Ç¨¬ù type of idealism!”

Well, when the Nazi Party was originally founded in 1918, it was socialist. But after Hitler took control, the party ideology quickly shifted to the right wing. By 1933, the only element of “socialism” left in the party was its title. Indeed, with a person like Hitler leading a “socialist” party, people are bound to be skeptical. This ties with my statement above.

“The political spectrum can be confusing. For example,if some say anarchism is on the left,then how does one explain anarcho-capitalism, aka free-market anarchism? There are some people who say the extreme Left is defined as extreme socialism and extreme social control whereas the extreme Right is no socialism and no control at all. By that definition, wouldn?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t the extreme Right not be Nazism(National Socialism) but instead be nihilism?”

That’s why the political compass was created:
http://www.politicalcompass.org/

By: William Milton

William Milton — Tue, 25 Dec 2007 12:37:41 +0000

@LeftTurn, After advocating that the workers usurp the means of production,Karl Marx did advocate a “Dictatorship of the Proletariat”,albeit temporarily.You’re getting into semantics because I didn’t go into details. —I’m confused as to what you mean about Mao. How was Mao, a Communist dictator not left-wing in any practical way? Maybe I don’t understand exactly what you mean by “practical”! Or your definition of “left wing”! Or both! — I once read years ago an op-ed piece in a socialist newpaper claiming that National Socialism(Nazism) wasn’t really socialism! I think it was merely a case of the author disowning a racist brand of socialist philosophy that didn’t fit into his multicultural, egalitarian “socialism with a human face” type of idealism! — The political spectrum can be confusing. For example,if some say anarchism is on the left,then how does one explain anarcho-capitalism, aka free-market anarchism? There are some people who say the extreme Left is defined as extreme socialism and extreme social control whereas the extreme Right is no socialism and no control at all. By that definition, wouldn’t the extreme Right not be Nazism(National Socialism) but instead be nihilism?