Comments on: Time for a pro-spirituality coalition? http://ShelleyTheRepublican.com/2007/08/14/time-for-a-pro-spirituality-coalition.aspx?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=time-for-a-pro-spirituality-coalition Dr George Rekers is not a homo! Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:44:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: Bob http://ShelleyTheRepublican.com/2007/08/14/time-for-a-pro-spirituality-coalition.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-99314420 Bob Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:20:25 +0000 http://www.shelleytherepublican.com/2007/08/14/time-for-a-pro-spirituality-coalition.aspx#comment-99314420 HAHAHA! I laughed my ass off. This is as good as christwire. If this isn't satire then I have more reason to be ashamed over the human race. HAHAHA!
I laughed my ass off.
This is as good as christwire.

If this isn’t satire then I have more reason to be ashamed over the human race.

]]> By: Gareth http://ShelleyTheRepublican.com/2007/08/14/time-for-a-pro-spirituality-coalition.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-99314175 Gareth Fri, 04 Jun 2010 07:55:30 +0000 http://www.shelleytherepublican.com/2007/08/14/time-for-a-pro-spirituality-coalition.aspx#comment-99314175 Man, I hope this is satire otherwise my opinion of people just dropped WAY down... Man, I hope this is satire otherwise my opinion of people just dropped WAY down…

]]> By: George, American http://ShelleyTheRepublican.com/2007/08/14/time-for-a-pro-spirituality-coalition.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-99311140 George, American Mon, 14 Dec 2009 01:07:00 +0000 http://www.shelleytherepublican.com/2007/08/14/time-for-a-pro-spirituality-coalition.aspx#comment-99311140 This is easily the most hilarious piece of satire I have read in a while. Keep up the good work! This is easily the most hilarious piece of satire I have read in a while. Keep up the good work!

]]> By: Athur Eist http://ShelleyTheRepublican.com/2007/08/14/time-for-a-pro-spirituality-coalition.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-99310565 Athur Eist Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:34:17 +0000 http://www.shelleytherepublican.com/2007/08/14/time-for-a-pro-spirituality-coalition.aspx#comment-99310565 Richard dawkins is one of the three greatest men in the world alive now, the other two being Obama and stephen Hawkins. What he is trying to do is not just tell people what to do and threaten them with eternal punishment if they don't follow much revised, mis-matching script. He is encouraging people to challenge belief and stop websites like this one. One great government funded show that I saw was about a very intelligent mathematician exploring what is the concisous 'I'. It was showing almost undeniable disproof for the existence of a soul. If you are intrested go on the BBC I-player, the program is horizena Richard dawkins is one of the three greatest men in the world alive now, the other two being Obama and stephen Hawkins. What he is trying to do is not just tell people what to do and threaten them with eternal punishment if they don’t follow much revised, mis-matching script. He is encouraging people to challenge belief and stop websites like this one.
One great government funded show that I saw was about a very intelligent mathematician exploring what is the concisous ‘I’. It was showing almost undeniable disproof for the existence of a soul. If you are intrested go on the BBC I-player, the program is horizena

]]> By: Corin http://ShelleyTheRepublican.com/2007/08/14/time-for-a-pro-spirituality-coalition.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-99267556 Corin Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:12:09 +0000 http://www.shelleytherepublican.com/2007/08/14/time-for-a-pro-spirituality-coalition.aspx#comment-99267556 Demsbki is ill-informed. Channel4 is not part of the BBC and is not funded by the television receiver license fee. Channel4 is a state owned television network funded by the sale of commercial air time, so taxpayers are not funding this show, but it is being funded by the advertizing agencies and those companies wishing to advertize their goods and services via the audience of this show. Why has Dembski not called for a boycott of the goods and services of those companies who bought advertizing time associated with this show? Demsbki is ill-informed.

Channel4 is not part of the BBC and is not funded by the television receiver license fee.

Channel4 is a state owned television network funded by the sale of commercial air time, so taxpayers are not funding this show, but it is being funded by the advertizing agencies and those companies wishing to advertize their goods and services via the audience of this show.

Why has Dembski not called for a boycott of the goods and services of those companies who bought advertizing time associated with this show?

]]>