Comments on: Chatting With Charlie: Continental Drift

By: Jim Bob

Jim Bob — Wed, 09 May 2007 19:14:34 +0000

Wow that guy is really something

I agree with every comment so far excluding those about blood orgies and Satan, being a vegetarian atheist.

I often discus these kind of things with some creationist friends, they often seem pretty crazy, but they pale into insignificance compared to this buffoon, I dare not show them this for fear of embarrassing them

It never ceases to amaze and appal me the level to which these people can be absorbed and blinded by their faith

Maybe he is taking the Mickey?

By: Robert Madewell

Robert Madewell — Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:57:33 +0000

I saw many of “Charlies” Videos on God’s Tube. I don’t agree with anything he say’s. But, what bothers me is that he doesn’t give a last name so I can do more research on Charlie. I have googled many times and still no last name for Charlie. Is he afraid? WHO IS HE!?!?!?!?

By: democrat man

democrat man — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:31:13 +0000

HAIL SATAN!!!!! BLOOD ORGEY YEAH

By: democrat man

democrat man — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:29:57 +0000

u guys can kiss my ass bush can go to hell we r in war for no reasson!!! im am a very upset satanic man u guys can kiss my demo ass

By: Cannon Fodder

Cannon Fodder — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:34:36 +0000

You people are truly idiots if you believe that continental drift occurred during the short time of “Noah’s flood.”

By: paulg

paulg — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:50:06 +0000

that really made no sense. I’m not sure if he is ignoring all geological knowledge to this point or if he is really that thick. You say “Liberal geologists often cite ?¢‚Ç¨?°?É‚Äû?É¬?continental drift?¢‚Ç¨?°?É‚Äû?É¬? as evidence for an old-earth. This of course is wildly wrong because it contradicts all known biblical facts.” These people aren’t liberal geologists, they are just plain geologists, they work off evidence all of which disproves your ancient disjointed stories. and just to pull you up on one more point it does not contradict any known biblical facts because there are non. there are facts and there are lies rumors and untruths. guess which category this joker fits into. I’ll give you a clue it’s not the first.

By: onein6billion

onein6billion — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:11:34 +0000

You should not be allowed to have a “science” category for your nonsense.

By: Bock the Robber

Bock the Robber — Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:44:40 +0000

That’s what geologists do, isn’t it? Finding fault?

By: Anna

Anna — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:19:11 +0000

and the concept of ‘Biblical facts’ is of course an oxy-moron…

By: g

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 05:43:15 +0000

wow, that fella was pretty scatterbrained; he couldn’t formulate a full sentence. i’m not going to nitpick his statements, but as a geologist who studies the processes that occur on earth today and only then (after observation) makes an interpretation, i really do find fault with a lot of his logic. two examples:

1. when trying to explain continental drift, he talks about heating and cooling of the oceans to produce “flooding”. problem here, is that cooling of the oceans would not necessarily make them receed unless a significant portion of the earth’s fresh water was instantaneously trapped into glacial ice. simple concept of volume and space folks…

2. when talking about laminar deposition (flat beds of sediment), he states that there are no time gaps/irregularities between strata. this is completely false: gaps of time represented by erosion of a surface occur everywhere in the sediment record, and they are called unconformities, nonconformities and paraconformities. basically, they represent a period in time where the ancient environment shifted from depositional to erosional, so instead of sediment being deposited there, sediment was taken away. tons of examples of both of these environemtns exist today, and i’d be more than happy to supply links and explain them if you would so desire.

-g