Comments on: Shakespeare: A malign influence on our children’s minds.

By: Lord Syron

Lord Syron — Sat, 08 Mar 2008 04:52:36 +0000

My God, sam. It is ignorant fools like you and whoever it is that wrote this that give christians and Americans a bad name.

Please just get off the internet. you don’t belong here.

By: omgggg.

omgggg. — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:00:13 +0000

this is stupid. you understand shakespear you have to realize he speaks mostly in iams & that it is hard to understand. but no no no, your taking this two far. shakespear wrote about romeo + juliet-is that a gay relation ship? NO! and also when hamlet called his mother a whore, it was because at the time he believed she had taken part in the killing of his father so she could marry his uncle. wouldnt you think ill things of your mother if she killed your father to marry your fathers brother? i think so.

By: erikrat

erikrat — Sun, 16 Dec 2007 07:46:48 +0000

how do you….
How does one insult the greatest writer ever to have lived?
I mean… Shakespeare is the foundation for almost all of modern literature….
Holy Hell

By: vagabundia » Blog Archive » La libertad no es gratuita

vagabundia » Blog Archive » La libertad no es gratuita — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:49:12 +0000

[...] Shakespeare: Una influecia maligna para las mentes j??venes [...]

By: John B

John B — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:01:02 +0000

Simon, get back to your Brokeback Mountian marathon.

Banning Shakespeare is so amusing you should be on The Colbert Report to present it.

Vische French Guy should read Left Behind. It is a series of 12 or 13 bookis, has 4 movies out. You’d likely find them to be well-written.

IMPEACH FRANCE’S APPLESAUCE!!!

By: Simon

Simon — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:00:25 +0000

@ Sam…….you do that Sam, and whilst you’re down there on your knees praying you can give me a bit of ‘relief’ as well…what time shall I drop by?

By: Sam Johnston

Sam Johnston — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:40:13 +0000

@ Simon… I’m sorry to hear that you are going to hell. I’ll remember you in my prayers tonite.

By: Simon

Simon — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:49:45 +0000

@ Sam

When I meet you Sam, I’ll kick your ass……in fact I’ll fuck it so hard you won’t sit down for a week you snivelling lil’ prick

By: Danny Ditto

Danny Ditto — Sun, 26 Nov 2006 23:41:08 +0000

Pericles, I agree that some Shakespeare is good & you can learn something from it. As far as revisionist history goes, I don’t like politically correct lies but sometimes the official history is a pack of lies also! For example, the Confederate States didn’t secede from the Union mainly or solely over slavery, but over tariffs & other issues! The “Civil” war or War Between the States was actually like the Revolutionary War! Abraham Lincoln wanted to pass a Constitutional Amendment to officially institutionalize slavery before he became President! He was a white supremacist who used the slavery issue as a propaganda ploy! The Emancipation Proclamation freed no slaves in Northern slave states & had no teeth in Confederate states that hadn’t surrendered! There’s more information in the books of Thomas DiLorenzo who does op-ed pieces at http://www.lewrockwell.com There’s also the book THE SOUTH WAS RIGHT by James R.Kennedy & Walter D.Kennedy.

By: Pericles

Pericles — Sun, 26 Nov 2006 21:24:05 +0000

@sam

While it’s true Polonius was portrayed as a buffoon when in public (or groups larger than 2), in private he was quite logical and well-spoken. The concept of “duality” was developed in nearly all the major characters – Hamlet played at being insane when he was clearly not. Claudius was publicly quite firm and confident, but he was an absolute nervous (haunted) wreck when in private. If you’re trying to say that because Polonius was a buffoon sometimes, his (good) advice is somehow bad, I don’t think you’re standing on firm ground when you make such a criticism.

Personally, I like some Shakespeare – dislike other Shakespeare – however I think it’s important for all of us to have a healthy respect and understanding for the work and the history. It’s especially important for all those of us who cherish freedom in the United States to understand the dire stuation that peasants lived in under the feudal system. That systemic tyranny … that individuals dealt with for hundreds of years … helped to lay the groundwork for the American and French Revolutions, believe it or not. Shakespeare is an excellent source for some perspective on the oppression that our predecessors rebelled against.

While Kings in some areas of the world – such as King Cyrus the Great in the middle east – were quite benevolent and in favor of human rights, the European royalty of the time was considerably less advanced.

Ain’t history great? (As long as you can keep the revisionists away from it.)

By: Random Libral Guy

Random Libral Guy — Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:01:38 +0000

I’m a liberal guy but I’m not into Shakespear. We are aware of the sexual referance in his writings but his story just doesn’t interest me that much. Just like with any other author out there people have likes and dislikes and Shakespear happen to be the one I dislike. Just so you know, you need to stop making generalization of people who oppose your view. It’s like saying Americans are fat, anybody with dark coloured skin are terrorist, current American politics is very similar to Nazis regime in 1940s…etc.

Anyway thank you for this website. Whenever I need something truly to hate I come on to this website and I get my fix. Seriously, after reading STR.com it does make me want to become part of a terrorist group.

By: Elendil

Elendil — Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:21:44 +0000

For myself, I’ve seen MUCH MORE filth spewn here on STR than in the entire Shakespeare’s work.

Slovak Guy

By: omg jebus

omg jebus — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:47:45 +0000

The lord hast penetrated thine offspring via the rectum.