Comments on: When will we digitally disarm the terrorists?

By: superherofurrypokemonbestialitygod666

superherofurrypokemonbestialitygod666 — Mon, 09 May 2011 20:47:17 +0000

I’m baffled by the fact you think our English speed cameras are anti-terrorist cameras. Also, remember you are us, Tristan. Or do you not celebrate the 4th with your American buddies?

By: Is I laughing

Is I laughing — Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:42:23 +0000

Tristans ammendmants:
1 Kill all gay
2 Kill all liberal
3 Kill all black
4 Ban all means of communication
5 Kill all other religions
Sound familiar?
This guy has way too much paranoia

By: whatnow?

whatnow? — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:00:31 +0000

Big Brother knows.
Big Brother is watching
Always listen to Big Brother, as Big Brother knows best.

Welcome to your paradise.

By: Howard Anderson

Howard Anderson — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:00:57 +0000

As a God-fearing member of the American National Socialist Party, I endorse your view that digital camera ownership should be restricted to those entrusted not to damage American interests, both domestic and abroad.

I also advocate disarming the American populace at large, or at least make ownership of firearms illegal for non-Christians.

Only through exterminating our enemies, namely atheists, communists, homosexuals, and all who do not accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior, we must cleanse our great country of these Satanic influences.

Praise the Lord, and Hail Victory!!!

By: Jeff

Jeff — Sun, 09 Nov 2008 21:43:50 +0000

And I thought the liberals were the paranoid ones. You show me that the two party system is broken and, needs to be reformed. Extremist like you are the only true terrorists there are. You want to abridge everyone elses freedoms. THe only place that a teerorist ever uses a camera is in TV show and movies. Never has there been so much as one photo found amoungst a terrorists possesions. And everyone with a Dslr is a child pornographer, please take your meds. Granted I may get some pics of underaged animals (being a noture shooter), you Hitler, Stalin and, Mao would all do well together, surpressing freedoms. I think your internet priviledges should be taken away. How do you like that?

By: Jerry

Jerry — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:48:29 +0000

So… when did they forget to keep the door to your cell locked at the asylum?

Dude, you need to get a life. I am a photographer with expensive camera equipment. That doesn’t make me a terrorist, nor a pedophile anymore than owning a Cadillac makes all Caddy owners pimps. It makes me a photographer. As to why I decided to spend a large sum of money on my hobby, well that’s MY business and all that you need to know is that it is not to do anything illegal.

Hey dummy… if Osama wanted pics of the white house, all he does is aim a few satellites in the right direction and they can tell you in perfect detail even the license plate numbers of any cars inside the compound. The US and other countries have been doing this for YEARS.. they sure don’t need someone with a camera kneeling down taking a few pictures from a useless angle when a satellite can do the job better.

I *sincerely* hope you seek professional medical assistance, because dude, you NEED it… badly.

I get enough harrasement from uninformed A-holes like you already. We don’t need to be uselessly scaring people with your BS.

By: Allmighty

Allmighty — Sun, 13 May 2007 17:20:55 +0000

You are all fu*@in crazy

By: Bean-O

Bean-O — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:44:57 +0000

Ok, you hate Nazis right?

Then why does this sound like something the Nazis did in the 1930′s?

Because in fact, in the 1930′s Hitler banned all use of cameras inside his country.

Who sounds like a Nazi now?

By: Liberal Athiest Linux user running firefox.

Liberal Athiest Linux user running firefox. — Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:19:44 +0000

“you kwon i think you got paranoia
look it:

??Ç¬¢?¢‚Ç¨?°?É‚Ä°?Ç¬®??É¬¨If we do not act today, the next ??ÉÀú?Ç¬¨?É¬??Ç¬¨?clicks??ÉÀú?Ç¬¨?É¬??Ç¬¨? you hear will be the bullets that kill your wife and children.??Ç¬¢?¢‚Ç¨?°?É‚Ä°?Ç¬®?Ç¬¨?É¬?

now look, from wikipedia:
??Ç¬¢?¢‚Ç¨?°?É‚Ä°?Ç¬®??É¬¨Paranoia is an excessive anxiety or fear concerning one??Ç¬¢?¢‚Ç¨?°?É‚Ä°?Ç¬®?¢‚Ç¨?°?É‚Äò?Ç¬¢s own well-being which is considered irrational and excessive, perhaps to the point of being a psychosis??Ç¬¢?¢‚Ç¨?°?É‚Ä°?Ç¬®?Ç¬¨?É¬?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoia
”

Took the words right out of my mouth.

By: armyman

armyman — Thu, 05 Apr 2007 03:55:59 +0000

i am in the army and like to think that i fight for our freedom to do what we want within legal limits, things like gun control and not making me regester my camara and tell my child that she has to live in a communist still country that you want it to be, i have lost to many friends in places like iraq so that we can have or camaras and or FREE lives

By: APB110781

APB110781 — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:41:59 +0000

Well… If this IS serious it’s at least disproved evolution theory over creationism… afterall, by rights This one should have “darwinated” a long time ago…

By: Liberal

Liberal — Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:30:05 +0000

I own a camera *shocking* and am a good friend of Bin Laden.
I love nothing more than to spend a weekend plotting against the beloved president by making him do explicit things with children in photo editing software.

By: wb

wb — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:35:13 +0000

I fear that this person’s reflections are serious,
but the paranoia and irony is too thick to take it seriously.

The mere fact that you posted a digital picture of a man taking a picture of the White House reveals the failed logic of this post.

However, if this was satire, it is a wonderful artistic statement of “Who is watching whom.” Is it those dang liberal terrorist running (the man in the red) or is it the paranoid conservatives (the real photographer)