Ned Lamont: Osama’s candidate for the Senate
Friends,
We Republicans are sick to death of whiny liberals talking about how bad it is that America, Israel and the rest of the free world are winning the war on Terror. Whats so wrong with backing a winner? It’s only something that a pro-terrorist defeat-ocrat could object to. Since when did Americans want to be led by a bunch of namby-pamby peaceniks?
These evil men claim to speak for America, however they hate everything we stand for. The Democ-rats would just hand America over to Al-Queda and the athiests. This is what Joe Lieberman was trying to stop, and this is why the Democrats hate him.
Last week the Democrats just fired their only reasonable Senator, and elected a cut’n'run candidate whose only stated policy is to be soft on terror. They call themselves “Anti-War”, but most Americans know that this is just another way of saying “Pro-Terrorist”. If Osama Bin Laden could vote in a Presidential election, you can bet he would vote Democrat. Ned Lamont is his kind of candidate, because both Ned Lamont and Osama hate America.
Ned Lamont wants to take American troops out of Iraq. Osama Bin Laden wants to take American troops out of Iraq. Both Ned and Osama want the same thing therefore their policies are identical.
The American people overwhelmingly support our president: They overwhelmingly support our soldiers and their mission. What could be more distasteful to Americans than the absurd rhetoric of the defeat-ocrats who think America should just pull out of Iraq, Afghanistan and leave those countries to the people that our President rightly calls Islamic Fascists. The simple fact is, our soldiers want toremain in Iraq. If they were not too busy fighting America’s enemies they would be telling us to send them to Syria, Lebanon and any other place where asses need to be whooped for the U.S.A.
There’s an insurgency growing in the state of Conneticut. Our vice president said, “The thing that?s partly disturbing about it [Lieberman's loss] is the fact that, the standpoint of our adversaries, if you will, in this conflict, and the al Qaeda types, the they clearly are betting on the proposition that ultimately they can break the will of the American people.”
The new state of Conneticut, as imagined by Ned Lamont. He plans to forge a deadly alliance of islamofascist and ultra-left wing liberal athiests. We republicans will prevent this from happening.
Americans fear that a peacenik victory only encourages terrorists. Fortunately, this is going to be a short-term victory for the defeat-ocrats. Joe Lieberman, is doing the right thing: He’s running as an independent against the disloyal party that betrayed him. He owes this to America.
23 comments
23 Comments so far
Leave a reply
Loading ...
So why exactly does Lebanon need it’s ass kicked? Just trying to get the details right here.
Don’t bother Jakub. All you’ll get is rhetorical insanity and ridiculous attacks about how you’re the Anti-Christ.
This is site is entertaining, even more now that her degenerate brother became a contributor. At least before they had people who could write …
@Jakub
Thats one of the numerous problems with STR.com, they are never able to get their facts straigt… and if they can?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•t find the facts which fit their purpose, they create their own…..
yeah they don’t get teh facts right, instead of looking at lebanon and syria str.com should use its’ eloquence and publicity to show up a much worse problem for america: the communists spreading all over latin and southern america.
i would very much appreciate it if one of the well-versed authors would take the time to show the god loving people of america which danger the doctrine of godless communism means for america!
“So why exactly does Lebanon need it?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s ass kicked? Just trying to get the details right here.”
Have you not been watching the news? Islamofascists are threatening America. They are trying to blow up our aeroplanes, plus they have obtained WMDs. This is our opportunity to liberate the people of the rogue-state that threatens America and our allies in the middle-east.
So your whining and crying that in an election by the people, for the people, the people chose Ned Lamont. Get over it. And get used to it, because your going to see a lot of republicans losing their seats come November. I’m a republican, but I’m hitting every lever with a “D” after their name to clean house of all the corrupt riff raff thats in there now.
The new state of Conneticut, as imagined by Ned Lamont. He plans to forge a deadly alliance of islamofascist and ultra-left wing liberal athiests. We republicans will prevent this from happening.
And how do you want to preven this?
Tristan said:
Have you not been watching the news? Islamofascists are threatening America. They are trying to blow up our aeroplanes, plus they have obtained WMDs. This is our opportunity to liberate the people of the rogue-state that threatens America and our allies in the middle-east.
Yes, I have watched the news. Not one word about WMD?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•s. And now 15000 soldiers of a UN security force are dispatched into southern lebanon. American soldiers are clearly neither wanted nor neeed down there. And at least try to realise that the hisbollah is not the official lebanese government, please.
About Iraq: Do you know the istory of vietnam? Only small losses in the first two years, but then it started. Seems like it is starting in Iraq, too. And a question for you: If the war in Iraq is over, why doing the army still perform offensive actions. This is only possible if there?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•s still a war going on down there.
The German Guy
They have tried to blow up our airplanes?
Like the kit with the toy gun tries to blow them up? (bang bang)
They have acquired WMD’s?
There you go making up stuff again.
Why dont you say you want to blow them up because you dont like them… Is it that hard to be truthful?
Great Work as always. Thank you Tristan.
You know what, if people like LeMont get to power in, within this decade we have towellheads running around in the white house!
Shelley G.
Lamont is his name, ok. What kind of a name is that. Is he a stinking frenchman????
Shelley
Shelley said:
Lamont is his name, ok. What kind of a name is that. Is he a stinking frenchman????
Goodman is her name, ok. What kind of name is that. Is she a snobish brit????
See Shelley, you could tell something bad about every name.
Shelley said:
You know what, if people like LeMont get to power in, within this decade we have towellheads running around in the white house!
If you don?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•t get it, he has already made it into Senate. And your beloved GWB is on an alltime low. If today were elections, he would only get 33%!
The German Guy
Shelley, I agree with you. Did you know that even the ultra-liberal news channel CNN is calling Lamont (or whatever his name is) the “Al-Queda Candidate”. Even liberals think that Lamont is an extremist.
Anybody with a shred of common sense can see how abusrd the looser-crat’s cut’n'run policy is. Our president says that it is time to stay the course, and we agree.
Oh, Shelley, did you hear the news. Seems like someone is going to teach Baby Bush a lesson he won?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•t forget:
San Francisco Puts Impeachment on the November Ballot
SAN FRANCISCO, CA — Four City San Francisco Supervisors have put their pens to a document that will allow the city’s 421,000 registered voters an up or down vote on the merits of impeaching both President George W. Bush and Vice President Richard B. Cheney this November 7th. The San Francisco Impeachment Ballot Initiative, like the Berkeley Impeachment Ballot Initiative approved on June 27th, 2006, was drafted in close coordination with Constitution Summer, a nonpartisan, national coalition of students at the nation’s law schools and universities. Champaign-Urbana, Illinois quietly approved the first municipal presidential impeachment initiative in American history on April 11th, 2006.
News of the San Francisco decision was withheld until today because Supervisor Chris Daly, who drafted the measure, was on vacation. In addition to Supervisor Daly, Supervisors Ross Mirkarimi, Tom Ammiano, and Jake McGoldrick signed the measure. Constitution Summer helped Supervisor Daly’s office select constitutionally grounded language based on the Articles of Impeachment Against George W. Bush, which was drawn up by the attorneys at the Center for Constitutional Rights. These articles include: the Bush Administration’s felonious disregard for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, which governs electronic surveillance in the United States; the initiation of an illegal war of aggression based on fraudulent claims; extraordinary rendition, indefinite detention, and torture; and an unconstitutional arrogation of power to the executive branch. In addition to these Articles, Supervisor Daly added the Bush Administration’s failure to adequately respond to the Hurricane Katrina disaster as a failure to faithfully execute the laws of the United States.
The Articles of Impeachment included in the San Francisco initiative, and with exception of the Katrina response issue, the rationale behind them, are available in a book entitled The Articles of Impeachment Against George W. Bush, published by Melville House Publishing. Melville House recently organized a series of national impeachment teach-ins based on the book, the largest of which was co-sponsored and organized by Constitution Summer. Constitution Summer’s teach-in was attended by hundreds of people, and the speakers included Center for Constitutional Rights Legal Director Bill Goodman, Constitution Summer Advisory Board Member Daniel Ellsberg, and Constitution Summer President Geoffrey King.
Of the San Francisco Impeachment Initiative, King says, “The President and Vice President claim that they are protecting American freedom by surveilling and disappearing anyone they please, including American citizens, by tricking the people and Congress of the United States into an unnecessary war, and by creating a massive torture bureaucracy. They claim that this behavior is lawful and constitutional, and that no other branch of government should be able to check their power. A chorus of millions of Americans is saying that the President and Vice President are wrong, and today, the City of San Francisco has complimented that chorus with an instrument of democracy, the direct referendum.”
Coincidentally, Supervisor Daly’s announcement of the San Francisco Impeachment Initiative coincides with the 32nd anniversary of the resignation of Richard M. Nixon. Dr. Daniel Ellsberg, a member of the Constitution Summer Advisory Board, leaked the now famous Pentagon Papers that the press ultimately used to reveal the impossibility of winning the war in Vietnam. President Nixon’s retaliation against Dr. Ellsberg led directly to Nixon’s resignation. Dr. Ellsberg said of Constitution Summer’s work:
“The young men and women of Constitution Summer are like the people under General Washington in Valley Forge. And General Washington’s ragtag group did win, incidentally.”
In addition to the San Francisco initiative, lobbyists Susie Shannon of Poverty Matters and Sophie de Vries of After Downing Street met with staff from Assemblymember Paul Koretz’s office in Sacramento, where Shannon and de Vries presented a petition with the names of thousands of Californians who support impeachment. Assemblymember Koretz is the author of the AJR39, a California-wide impeachment resolution that, if passed, would be transmitted to the House of Representatives via Rule 603 of Thomas Jefferson’s Rules of Parliamentary Procedure, which allows state legislatures to transmit articles of impeachment directly to the House of Representatives. Rule 603 has been invoked successfully before: in 1903, Florida District Judge Charles Swayne was impeached in a process that started in the Florida State Legislature. In addition to California, resolutions to impeach President Bush are pending in the state legislatures of Illinois and Vermont.
\”If you don?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•t get it, he has already made it into Senate. And your beloved GWB is on an alltime low. If today were elections, he would only get 33%!\”
Luckuly George W Bush does not have to impress 33% or any percentage of Germans like you. In America, he remains one of the most popular presidents ever. Lamont has not been elected to the Senate, he is merely a candidate for the Democratic party, a party which has lost the faith of Americans because of their inability to support our soldiers and our allies in the war against terror.
“Luckuly George W Bush does not have to impress 33% or any percentage of Germans like you. In America, he remains one of the most popular presidents ever.”
I think you’re behind the times. He has an approval rating in the low 30’s. He’s the most popular president ever in your own head there buddy. If you dispute this, provide proof. Proof meaning an official website with current approval ratings. If you don’t provide this, we will all just assume that you know you’re lying and that you’re dishonest and going to hell, possibly in a handbasket, ha.
AND!! Lebanon is FREE. They love their government. Hezbollah is NOT their government. I know many Lebonese and they are among the nices people I know. NONE of them were ever members of Hezbollah. In fact, they were part of the christian coalition, which operates in Lebanon. Do us all a favor and actually READ something.
OR you are very stupid OR you are very smart, but for the goodness of mankind, i hope it’s the first
fucking blind idealist
your a neonazi of the worst kind, only you’ve got to find out yet!
I have to say, the people that run this website are just plain insane. At first I thought this was a gag, then after reading more into it I realize some of you actually believe this stuff. Facts are fact people; Bush is the first commander in chief to be approved by only 33% of the population. That is a fact, shown to us by this little thing called math, or do you people not believe in math. Anyway I have to say I enjoy reading this website. It makes me a little more angry every morning, and that will make it all the more sweet when one by one the old corrupt republicans (people of the REPUBLIC not Democracy) start to fall and the democrats (those that support democracy, not the republic) retake this country for the betterment of humanity. And really, Shelly, making fun of French people, when you yourself of are British ancestry! I bet your family has been here no more than what, 100 maybe 200 years? By those standards you are nearly an immigrant. The hypocrisy is amazing.
Tristan said:
Luckuly George W Bush does not have to impress 33% or any percentage of Germans like you. In America, he remains one of the most popular presidents ever. Lamont has not been elected to the Senate, he is merely a candidate for the Democratic party, a party which has lost the faith of Americans because of their inability to support our soldiers and our allies in the war against terror.
Well, that was an official poll executed by your government in every state of the USA. not in Germany. But here in Europe he would perhaps get 20%. And right now the Democrats would get, I?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•m again reffering to official polls made in your country, a majority of votes!
Oh, by the way. Did you read the news I posted. Seems like the outcry for impeachment is starting.
The German Guy
An article about approval ratings taken from: http://www.rightwingnews.com/archives/week_2006_07_09.PHP#006053
Here’s the thing: None of this means very much. People don’t vote Democratic and Republican slates of candidates. They don’t choose between generic Republicans and generic Democrats. They choose between real people with flaws, quirks, and different positions on key issues that matter to the voters.
For a perfect example of how this plays out in the real world, take a look at this excerpt from an article at Betsy’s Page that was based on something written by the Mystery Pollster:
With no names mentioned, things do not look good for the Republican incumbents in these three districts.
Generic Ballot
NJ 07
D 45
R 44
PA 07
D 51
R 39
OH 01
D 47
R 44
So, if you just looked at the generic poll number for these three districts, you’d think that those incumbent Republicans congressman are in a lot of trouble. They may well be. But, look at how the numbers switch when the respondents are given the names of the candidates.
NJ 07
Linda Slender-D 41
Mike Ferguson-R 50
PA 07
Jo Sestak-D 41
Curt Weldon-R 51
OH 01
John Cranley-D 43
Steve Shabot-R 52
So, if these polls don’t matter, what does?
Approval ratings and multiple head to head match-ups of the candidates in a race based on registered, or even better, likely voters, not adults.
A single poll can often be wrong. The demographics used to compile it can be slanted and the margin of error can distort what’s happening as well. However, if you can take a look at the results of several head to head polls, in the period before the election, and see who’s ahead in a race and which way the numbers are trending, you can usually get a pretty good idea of what’s going on. But, generic data? Of course, you’d always rather have your guys running ahead rather than running behind, but whatever the case may be, you can look at those numbers all day long and it won’t give you an accurate picture of what’s going to happen at election time.
Last time I checked, your brother said were at the hospital, Shelley. I had a feeling that God was angry with you.
I want Osama Bin Laden to be found and juged for his crimes (and I would favor death penalty for his crimes).
You want Osama Bin Laden to be found and juged, too, I think ?
So we have the same policy ! (Ned Lamont and Osama Bon laden have the same policy because they both want American soldiers out of Irak)
I’m atheist, communist (but I don’t like the Chinese policy and the policy back in the USSR).
As we have the same policy, does that mean you are atheist and communist ? No.
The first time I heard of Ned Lamont is on this site, a few minutes ago, so I don’t know if he is really in league with the terrorists. But I know there are flaws in your argumentation.
Please correct those.
“Lamont is his name, ok. What kind of a name is that. Is he a stinking frenchman????”
Nope, it’s not french. Go to school, you racist ignorant red-neck !
maxine.
in case you didn’t realise it china & the ussr were not communist. There has never been a communist country ever. You are thinking of a socialist dictatorship