If you spent less time condemning and criticising people’s lifestyles with your tunnel-like and close minded vision, you’d probably realise people aren’t actually that bad .. just calm down and if you really want to do God’s word, try and be nice to people .. don’t “cure” them, just be nice.

And I think you better get your facts right before you blog. No one listens to a liar. Most of the “facts” you posted have no basis in reality. I like the one “gay parents will make their kids gay.”.

Right…… :\

I imagine you were that kid at school that didn’t really fit in .. and now you’re getting your own back by condemning people. Well get this, they don’t care. Everyone’s a sinner baby! ;]

xx

The bible also states to “love thy neighbor”. Nowhere does it say love thy “christian” neighbor.

And I have to say you have been one of the worst examples of ignorance and racism hiding behind a mask of intelligece I have come across in quite some time.

To call yourself “christian” is tantamount to spitting in the face of God. I’m sure there is a special level in hell reserved just for you.

Literal mindedness rears its ugly head again! ?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¨And speaking of books you would like taken out of the Bible: the book of Revelation was originally viewed a non-canon by early church founders?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?Ǭ? but look how you have taken the idea of the Rapture to heart, Sam. You contradict yourself (over and over)! You say \?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ?The Bible is perfect in every way. It?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s authorship a divine miraculous mystery.\?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ? but then you pick and choose what books and verses contradict your sheltered, repressed & literal minded life. You\?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥re too feeble minded to be allowed to present a blog to be taken seriously.

@MethatIam

Do not take parts of the Bible out of context, because you can be accused of heresy-and should be stoned outside the city walls-do you want all of the law or just what you see! Do you want to take scripture out that seemingly contradicts with other scriptures? No may GOD forbid you to do that-do not read into the scripture your own perversion and misinterpretation.

This book and all that it contains belongs in the Bible, and thank the Most High GOD! for the marriage bed!

Very good points….
Shelley and her fellow heretics have commited blasphemy over and over again….I think it?Ǭ¨?Ǭ•s time for somebody to take legal action against this website…

Shelley… 2 centuries ago you and your “claime to be Christians” would have been burned, for deliberaly twisting the sacred words of our LORD

The marriage bed cannot be defiled, and what you want to take away from the Holy Scriptures is what a sensual Man/Wife relationship could be. GOD Almighty created sex-not you nor your quasi Puritanical view of what is allowed in the marriage bed.

Catholics should be ashamed of themselves for denying the clergy to be married-as the Holy Scriptures DEMANDS, what part of the Revelation did you miss-a church of un married clergy is ANTI-CHRIST and is an APOTSTATE religion.

Sodomy is a Homosexual MAN/MAN relationship and is an abomination before a Holy God. To call my wife “sister” is not incests-in this world we as children of the most high are indeed brothers and sisters in Christ, redeemed and adopted into his house. As the JEWS are a chosen-remeber this is old Testament.

Read a little more of the song and you will find ORAL sex, and it is not SODOMY-just because some Catholic calls it Sodomy does not make it so. Sodomy defined is Homosexual relations. The Song of Solomon is a Bride-Groom relationship.

Do not take parts of the Bible out of context, because you can be accused of heresy-and should be stoned outside the city walls-do you want all of the law or just what you see! Do you want to take scripture out that seemingly contradicts with other scriptures? No may GOD forbid you to do that-do not read into the scripture your own perversion and misinterpretation.

This book and all that it contains belongs in the Bible, and thank the Most High GOD! for the marriage bed!

The bible is not suitable for children.

http://lolinternets2.ytmnd.com/

Add to that the fact that Jacobus de Voragine lived 200 years before Caxton, who you accused of writing the Song of Solomon.

It all seems pretty straight-forward and easy to understand; based on the sources you have shown me, there is no proof that Caxton did write or insert Song of Solomon into the Bible, nor is there any proof that Song of Solomon hasn’t always been part of the Christian Bible (quite the contrary, actually). So you tell me… what am I missing? Because so far from what I can tell based on your own “sources”, you are dead wrong, and it appears you are leading me on a wild goose chase.

Your lack of understanding astounds me! Can you not read the words that are in front of you and draw proper conclusions from them? I have no idea why you involve yourself with politics when your reasoning is so deeply flawed!