STR † THE FREEDOM BLOG©



Free Glenn Beck

Astronomy: Junk Science

I often wonder why astronomers are given such an easy ride. Their “science” is every bit as bogus as environmentalists (the guys who believe in global warming), and geologists (the idiots who think that the earth is millions of years old). After reading Anne Coulter’s excellent book “Godless” (reviewed recently) I began thinking about some of the kinds of junk-science invented by crazy liberal scientists in order to try to prove the Bible wrong. One of her most inspired chapters is an exploration of the “church of liberalism”, the collection of perverse set of pseudo-scientific beliefs that make up the crazy world-view of the liberal. Perhaps the strangest belief is that Astronomy (stargazing) can reveal anything at all about the origins of the universe.

The golden age of astronomy; A time when astronomers knew their limits.

Hundreds of years ago, astronomy was a diverting curiosity which served some important spiritual and commercial purposes. For example, astronomers were able to calculate the position of the “wandering star” that guided the three kings to the Christ-child’s manger. Having identified exactly which celestial body the kings had been following the astronomers proved that the biblical account of Christ’s birth was true, beyond all reasonable doubt.

We can also thank astronomers for producing star-charts that helped people navigate their wooden ships long before the existence of GPS and other modern navigational aids. The ships that took the Founding Fathers to to America were guided by charts made by some of the wisest astronomers that ever lived. This was truly a golden-age of astronomy, an age in which Astronomers knew their place and were wise enough not to set themselves above God.

Unfortunately, Astronomy’s golden luster has been tarnished somewhat by it’s associations with the fringe liberal junk-sciences of “evolutionary biology” and “geology”. Together, these “sciences” make a habit of issuing preposterous claims that disprove the Biblical account of the creation of the universe.

The modern-day astronomer is far-removed from his telescope-gazing ancestor. Picture a pot-smoking liberal, employed by a slack-moraled blue-state College. He may may never even look at the sky, preferring the company of their chalk-boards and computers. He has become far-removed from the majesty of creation, and it’s no wonder he fails to appreciate that only God could have created such splendor. Instead he offers nonsense theories involving “big-bangs”, “black-holes” and other such science-fiction absurdities.

Astronomers are able to command immense budgets to fund vanity-projects such as “orbital telescopes” and “super-coliders”, which are merely over-priced wrecking-balls designed to smash atoms together. You may wonder why astronomers need concern themselves with the minute – this is because they have fallen prey to a very typical liberal fallacy: Just like the liberal believes that you can reduce crime by being soft on criminals, the liberal astronomer thinks that you can study big objects by fantisizing about tiny ones. Perhps these looneys have been listening to to much “Escape Pod“.

This would all seem very hilarious, except that these pointless projects are being financed at tax-payer’s expense and at a time of war. That money could be used to finance the War on Terror, which promises to bring eternal peace to our world. Surely, star-gazing and atom-smashing is a trivial use for our nation’s limited resources at a time of war.

One of the most disturbing examples of liberal media gone mad is the “Slacker Astronomy” podcast, which claims to be an informative weekly audio journal of astronomy. This show purports to make astronomy fun. I’m sure somewhere there is a podcaster who would like to make Satanism seem fun, it would be no less damaging. A better way to learn about the universe would be to consult Genesis 1:1.

I know some of you are thinking that Astronomy is no more bizarre than any of the other theories liberals hold. After all, these are the same people who gave us the theories of “global warming” and Darwinian evolution. What harm does yet one more absurd liberal belief do to our country? Actually, there is a big problem: Many of the core beliefs of astronomers have started to infect our schools and colleges. Ask nearly any grade school teacher what a “big bang” is, and they will attempt to baffle you with the zany notion that our Universe was born in a gigantic explosion. Liberal teachers want you to believe that the Universe came from nothing and that before the Universe, there was nothing at all… not even God. Now do you see the problem?

Astronomy, as a science is a spent force. It only exists to further a dangerous liberal agenda. An agenda which has been almost entirely discredited by modern scholars such as Anne Coulter and the STR.com team. The real reason it is so highly funded is as a means of introducing atheism to impressionable teens. Liberals are so sure that astronomy is the best way to exclude God from America. Thats why they are keen to use every available agenda to push their strange ideas. Please dear readers, let us join together to condemn this junk-science and keep our schools free of this menace.

Yours in Christ,

Tristan

Update:

Nicholas from Maine added the following insightful comments on the junk-science that is astronomy:

I hope astronomy will be taught in schools as it is explained in the Bible. You could developped a little more adding that most astronomers do not have any explanation concerning how the sun and the moon where stopped by God. Only D W Patten gave sensible explanation on this matter. He clerverly explained how Mars modified the orbit of the Earth, by God’s will. Although his explanation are very simple (even I, not being a specialist, could understand them), most astronomers do not take Patten seriously and prefer to keep using their stupid complicated models.

You can see how flawed are the thesis of most astronomers by reading Brecht’s Life of Galileo. 4 centuries ago Galileo was already asked how God stopped the sun and the moon and he did not have any explanation, and wanted to keep working on other useless subjects.

Astronomers have not made any progress since then. If you have not read it already, I really recommend you to read “The life of Galileo”. Brecht really managed to show how hypocritical astronomers are, and that they are totally unable to have an objective discussion!

Also, the pretentiousness of the astronomers knows no bound: When Laplace (another crazy euro-trash scientist whose equations are still used in modern science! ) explained to Napol?on how, in his opinion, the world was created, Napoleon asked the only sensible question: “what about God in your model?”. Laplace answered that he “did not need this hypothesis” !

He called God an hypothesis ! If only Napoleon had executed Laplace, we wouldn’t be using Laplace’s equations in all fields of physics. I think astronomers should all be burnt, just like Giordano Bruno.

Share This Post 44 comments

44 Comments so far

  1. MC Peepants June 21st, 2006 1:46 AM

    Yeah, the Bible says the sun rotates around earth, with the other planets, and that has to be right.

  2. maerci June 21st, 2006 2:00 AM

    Booktip: Jostein Gaarder – Sophie’s World
    Read it, it’s bether than the Bible, because it’s true (100%; except the storry of Sophie, but this isn’t really important anyway)

  3. Galileo Galilei June 21st, 2006 2:22 AM

    Hi Tristan.
    Ever read about Galileo Galilei ?

    Try to figure what’s in common between your article and the story of this great astronomer !

  4. Osama Bin Mohamed Bi June 21st, 2006 4:26 AM

    Hey Tristan,
    Have you ever heard that astronomy has a strong historical link with islam? That the actual names of the major stars are derived from their arabic names?
    Should you conclude that astronomy is actually a terrorist, anti-american science?

  5. Anonymous June 21st, 2006 4:29 AM

    Even the great pope John Paul II recognised that the earth was revolving around the sun and not the contrary.

    And excuse me, the “big bang” theory and the “darwinian evolution” theory are exactly what they are called: theories. The same goes for the “Creationism” theory and the “intelligent design” theory. In science, there is very, very, very few things that you can call “true”, because a greater truth can always exist. At least that makes scientist opened to dialog, and not stuck on two thousand years old books

  6. Mike June 21st, 2006 4:33 AM

    Ok, Tristan. Go ahead and believe that the whole Universe revolves around the Earth and then try to explain the cycles of the moon, the tides and even the orbit of the other planets in our solar system! Of course you can’t, but luckily you have your “cosmic clock-maker” God to shore up any lapses in logical thinking… (i.e. I can’t explain that…hmmm, try a supernatural explanation!) – You also say that the same people who brought us the theory of evolution brought us global warming: Do your research, you idiot: (oh yeah, that’s right “research” requires a rational mind!) the two theories were developed nearly one-hundred years apart from each other making the possibility that the “same people” developed both highly improbable! But then again you probably believe that Methuselah was actually 969 years when he died, so that would make it at least possible for Darwin to still be alive when the theory of global warming was formulated.

    If you want the USA to return to a state of medieval ignorance, go ahead and spout your tripe! After all the world needs literal-minded ignorami to be the janitors and the other menial laborers, while the rest of us have a bit more awareness of the world around them. You’re sitting on a plateau, unaware (or just in denial) of the gargantuan peaks surrounding you! If the founders of Christianity itself were as narrow-minded as you, they probably never would have discerned themselves from Judaism.

    Go on, explain away a science that has been in development since BEFORE the foundation of Christianity and even perhaps before Judaism. I wouldn’t doubt that an idiot like you probably believes Astrology over Astronomy… in fact you probably can’t even explain the difference!

    oh yeah, Tristan… were your parents related in any way BEFORE they were married?

  7. zelootje June 21st, 2006 4:48 AM

    TRISTAN! are you completely insane??? relativity, superstring theory, proton research, calculations in red shifting, background radiation AND SO ON is all JUNK SCIENCE?????????
    please keep your nose out of topics you simply lack the motivation for to study! every alpha science and whole parts of beta sciences are completely connected, including astronomy so saying it is junk science is denying your fiberoptical connection to the internet!
    why is it so great in your opinion for founding fathers to travel US-warts with maps they were to stupid for to calculate and draw for themself?
    even the Phenicians were far superior to your founding fathers, even the Normans who started a village were NYC is standing now!
    jesus fucking christ you are to stupid to permit to walk around huh,,,
    ofcourse our solar system has an ending lifespan! never heard of particle halflife??? if it didn’t excist and the universe was eternal, hiroshima would still be a radiated hellhole and instead of nuclear waste having lifespans of thousands of years, it would NEVER vanish!
    as i understand bigbang theory is a THEORY, what’s so difficult about the word?!
    the human mind is incapable to see what insects see or to command their own intestants so gee, why it is hard to understand the expanding/collapsing universe i wouldn’t know,,,
    maybe the energies involved are to abstract to imagine directly?? yeah that’s alot different from your stupid god everyone’s discussing over and killing people for isn’t it

    stupid fucking dickhead i’m realy angry now so thank you for that

  8. Concerned Parent June 21st, 2006 5:06 AM

    DEAR SHELLEY!!

    I have just read something really vicious spread by the liberals!!!

    Stephen Hawking, who also protested against the Iraq war and is therefore a disgusting liberal, has been telling people with glee how he defied God’s instructions.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199673,00.html

    I urge you to write about this and pray for his soul.

  9. josh June 21st, 2006 5:38 AM

    you know, i can’t actually tell whether this is the best satirical website ever, or just frighteningly ignorant. either way its amusing reading, for all the wrong reasons. keep up the good/awful work!

  10. tycho June 21st, 2006 5:55 AM

    Dear Tristan,

    I agree with you the actual astronomers couldn’t be more wrong. In fact Earth is not a sphere but quite like a mushroom. And of course the sun rotates around us. This theory was developped by Pierre Gripari, a brilliant writer. The santa anna reached the border of the world and Colomb pretended having found the America to justify the investment to his queen. Then the catholics saw an opportunity to make money by raising funds to conquer this “new world”, the rest is history. So it is obvious that America does not exist, and that YOU, Tristan is a fraud. I suspect that you are a communist slave chained in Cuba and forced to write your website by the catholic mafia.

    God bless you,

    Tycho

  11. FSE June 21st, 2006 5:38 PM

    OFFTOPIC: We were hacked by Linux leftwing commis.. foobar

    Just an Explanation, we didnt hack You.. just just did a Setup of Wordpress while your Domain and subfolders were completely open for anybody! So we could just start your Installscript and takeover the Adminrights of your Application.. thats all.. a job a little kid could do..
    Greetings from the geeks ;)

  12. Nulllogik June 21st, 2006 6:41 PM

    Einstein was one of the most brilliant people ever. Yet he conceded that there had to be a god. See, you can believe in these things and still have faith.
    Eh?

    Start learning physics woman…

  13. T June 21st, 2006 7:06 PM

    I’m sorry, did I miss something? On what or whose authority do you have it that anything in the Bible-and exactly which version-is “100% true”? Did God Himself come down from the heavens and announce this to you personally, or are you just assuming it’s inherent truth? Or, more likely, are you simply dismissing what you call “junk science” because you don’t understand it? I admit, not every scientific theory turns out to be correct; however, that’s why it’s called a “theory” (i.e. the “theory” of Intelligent Design-which is, conveniently, not able to withstand ANY scrunity, scientific or philosophical) and also why “reasearch” is done to determine the “validity” of said theory or theories. This is known as the “Scientific Method”, and has been around in one form or the other since the first human asked a question about how something might work. I simply cannot understand why some people among us not only choose to be ignorant, but willfully so and furthermore, why so many of these same people want this willfull ignorance to be all-pervasive. Oh, and Anne Coulter is not a “scholar”, she is simply an opportunist. I’m certain that if there was more money to be made in peddling extreme liberalism she would be at the forefront of the far-left ideological debate.

  14. Fred June 21st, 2006 8:04 PM

    I we were listening to people like you we would burn women on flaming pilar … you know, something called “middle-age”.
    Progress is not very good all the time but is something that helped humanity staying alive .

  15. Ben Amis June 21st, 2006 10:29 PM

    As usual, I’ve gotta be the voice of dissent. The Bible doesn’t claim the Earth is flat, or that the sun revoles around it. The Bible is full of scientific FACT that was proven by science thousands of years later. The Bible says that the Earth is spherical (Isaiah 40:21-22), and says nothing about the Sun revolving around the Earth. If you think the Bible contridicts science, you’ve not read the Bible.

    Actually, the Bible is the reason for many of the scientific laws that we have today. People like Galileo and Newton were CHRISTIANS who studied the Bible and came to the conclusion that God is an orderly God, and that He must have rules that govern the universe and it’s behavior.

  16. Leonardo June 22nd, 2006 6:26 AM

    In fact…
    And AS A PRIEST TOLD ME parts of the Bible like Genesis MUST be interpreted.
    (btw there are two Genesis there)

  17. R2K June 22nd, 2006 8:07 AM

    Lol the golden age of astronomy is right. These days, it is all speculation. Why are there so many blue stars, and so few red stars? Think about that!

  18. yeah... no. June 22nd, 2006 9:50 AM

    go josh.
    screw the rest of you.

    from,

    the anti-re-pube-lickin

  19. Voice from Europe June 22nd, 2006 11:36 AM

    I’m from Poland (the country in the middle of Europe). I have to admit that education in US is much worse than in all Europe. I can’t imagine how you can learn your children the creationism theory on secular lessons!? This could be completly imposibble in Europe (not including a religion education). How can you depend your knowledge on the thousends years old book and still think that Earth is 4 thousends years old! It’ s pathology. You should be ashamed of your anti-scientific, catholic-like, republican ideology. I can asure you that majority of Europeans (and Poles too) laugh at both your education methods and your actually president. You have really very good astronomers but you destroys a valid way of educating your youth too. I live in country which is more catholic than US (90% of population). However I can say that even members of the most conservative parties belive in science discoveries.

    Sorry for not well known english.

  20. Antifascist June 22nd, 2006 12:04 PM

    Exactly, josh. It’s just too stupid to be true. I don’t know what happened to Shelley–maybe she got dropped on her head when she was a baby–but when you rely on faith, you can “prove” anything.

    Shelley–I suggest that you visit these two websites, and at least TRY to engage in a RATIONAL DEBATE with the residents:

    http://infidelguy.com/
    http://revolutionaryleft.com/

  21. spain June 22nd, 2006 12:31 PM

    I am really interested in this page, I mean, I read it everyday and still dont know if it is satirical (which seems to be obivous) or truth (which would produce me a dying of laughter), so I would thank any of you to tell me.
    God, it CANT BE TRUE
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH

  22. me June 22nd, 2006 12:32 PM

    astronomy…..astrology?

  23. Holland June 22nd, 2006 12:41 PM

    Yeah, I laughed out loud reading this, thinking it was satire, but if it’s meant seriously then my oh my do I fear for the future of the human race… How absolutely moronic do you have to be to write this and believe it?!

  24. Holland June 22nd, 2006 12:53 PM

    Now that I\’ve read more of the site I\’m pretty convinced it is pure satire – which makes it hilarious and very well done. Scary thing is though, too many of these right wing blogs are dead serious.

  25. potto June 22nd, 2006 2:54 PM

    why can’t you just accept these theories? ok, so in the bible it doesnt mention the big bang. but it doesnt actually explain the method god used to create the world does it? it just says he did it. so maybe he used a big bang.(no point being god if you cant be impressive) maybe it isnt written in the bible because, lets face it, who would read it? if it was three times as long as it already is and full of science, christianity wouldnt be a very popular religion would it? maybe they just left out the boring bits.

  26. AngryJim June 22nd, 2006 3:07 PM

    “An agenda which has been almost entirely discredited by modern scholars such as Anne Coulter”

    What!?!?!

    I hope you’re kidding. I really do. What business does Anne Coulter have trying to discredit astrophysicists? The people behind the research involving astronomy are some of the most brilliant minds to have ever lived.

    And hiding behind the Bible doesn’t disprove anything. The problem with the Bible is that it stops people from thinking because you believe it has all the answers.

    I’ve got one word for you that the Bible has absolutly no answer for. It will prove the Bible doesn’t have all the answers, and that we as humans need to be inquisitive rather than close-minded. If you can explain this word using the words of the Bible, I’ll renounce science, go to church on Sunday, and register as a Republican on Monday. That word is…

    Dinosaur.

  27. Max June 22nd, 2006 4:06 PM

    If NASA followed the Bible when they built the shuttle, well every astronaut would be dead by now.

    It’s not us smart liberals fault if you just can’t understand the true message behind Genesis.

    Idiots.

  28. SATAN June 22nd, 2006 5:32 PM

    Dear Shelley, Tristan!

    I have to tell you… God doesn’t exist!

    Satan

  29. Fiend June 22nd, 2006 7:02 PM

    Your stupidity has driven me to the brink of insanity. If I had to talk to you face to face, I think I would kill myself. All I can say is: Great, dipshit, now that you have condemned science, you should begin discrediting gastropods because they do not thank God every time their shell saves them from a potential threat. Do the world a favour and shut up.

    In case you are thinking of condemning this comment as well, I must inform you that I am not a Liberal, or a member of any other political faction. I’m just an ass.

  30. Claude June 22nd, 2006 9:36 PM

    Those crazy librils think the earth goes around the sun, to!!!??!??! How did they get tht idea when the bible clerly states the opposite.

    Thx Shelley & Tristan!!!!!!!!!

  31. Widdershins June 23rd, 2006 7:50 AM

    Wow, thanks, this really boosted my will and enthusiasm to finish my masters degree in astrophysics. Keep up! :D

  32. Revan June 23rd, 2006 2:14 PM

    A-Fucking-mazing, i love this site, best satire ever….wait…let me guess, the next article will attack biology and medical science for ‘un-godliness’?? maybe computer science for inveting the internet which promotes the liberal agenda? or maybe an article on Aryan supremacy?? Anti-Semetic articles?? Shelley and tristan you guys are comic genius or good candidates for cannon fodder in Iraq

  33. NoDeca June 23rd, 2006 3:26 PM

    i just read the update and i ask myself why god should’ve stopped the sun and moon. everything is moving in the universe. the moon is a piece of earth. you don’t need earth-mars catastrophics because there is an asteroid belt between mars and jupiter that could’ve been a former planet.
    telling me god stopped the sun and the moon is the same as reading in the bible the allmighty and allknowing god regrets making mankind and causes a planet-wide flood to drawn them and the giants spawned by angel and human intercourse,,,

  34. OMG June 23rd, 2006 4:59 PM

    ?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ?The guys who believe in global warming?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ? are right.
    ?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ?the idiots who think that the earth is millions of years old?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ?
    Actually, Earth is 4.5 billions years old.

  35. Scienthist June 24th, 2006 2:39 PM

    Hi,

    (As my nick implies I’ll talk as scientist and atheist)

    Do you read???

    Is it true your education level is sooooo low that even here in central america we learn science since childhood and you don’t?

    A historical book as the bible is an allegoric representation of the time about beliefs, nothing that can be seriously taken as a complete explanation.

    Just follow this line of reasoning of Giordano Bruno:

    “God is omniscient, perfect, and omnipotent and the universe is infinite. If God is all-knowing, he must be able to think of everything, including whatever I am thinking. Since God is perfect and completely actualized, he must create what he thinks. I can imagine an infinite number of worlds like the earth, with a Garden of Eden on each one. In all these Gardens of Eden, half the Adams and Eves will not eat the fruit of knowledge, but half will. But half of infinity is infinity, so an infinite number of worlds will fall from grace and there will be an infinite number of crucifixions. Therefore, either there is one unique Jesus who goes from one world to another, or there are an infinite number of Jesuses. Since a single Jesus visiting an infinite number of earths one at a time would take an infinite amount of time, there must be an infinite number of Jesuses. Therefore, God must create an infinite number of Christs.”

  36. lnxz June 26th, 2006 2:44 PM

    Great work, this is hilarious.

  37. John July 1st, 2006 3:06 PM

    To say that astronomy is a “junk science” carries serious implications. I don’t deny that it’s your opinion, but to state what you did implies that you can prove every claim that astronomers have ever made are blatantly incorrect. So can you? If you can I’d really be interested in seeing your arguments. Simply saying that astronomy was invented to attempt to prove the Bible wrong is a weak argument at best. To me, that just shows that rather than actually looking at astronomy with an open mind, you’re blinded and biased by religion and your political affiliation.

  38. Jason Corfman July 9th, 2006 5:45 PM

    OK, I realize that the last thing you want to do is confuse the issue with the facts, and that listening to other people’s viewpoints is a mortal sin, but if you are at all interested in this topic, I highly recommend the book Genesis and the Big Bang: The Discovery of Harmony Between Modern Science and the Bible by Gerald L. Schroeder. He points out that science and Genesis really aren’t that far off (including finding a Biblical scholar from around 1200 who studied the Hebrew Biblical texts and concluded that “in the beginning”, all of creation was compressed into a very small spot, smaller than a mustard seed… I don’t know how he figured that out 800 years ago, but that sounds an awful lot like the Big Bang theory).

    If you can’t be bothered to find (or read) a copy of the book, then I have an alternative, although it isn’t nearly as good or as complete. I used that same book as the basis for a term paper that I wrote for my “Intro to Religion” class at a private, Baptist-based college. I might point out that I got an A- on the paper. You can find that at http://www.corfyscorner.com/term.shtm. Granted, I did write this over 10 years ago, but the ideas still stand.

  39. Jason Corfman July 9th, 2006 5:46 PM

    Oops, I meant to say “Baptist-afiliated”, not “Baptist-based.” Sorry about that.

  40. Don Falcone July 14th, 2006 4:02 PM

    Hi Shelley,

    Your booktip is a little Mistake. Bertold Brecht was a german Communist, who had Trouble with the FBI in the year 1946.
    From your point of view was this great Writer the Antichrist.
    Common and read more than Tom Clancy and the Bible.

  41. Heady August 6th, 2006 7:30 AM

    hi Shelley and Tristan,

    if you want to discover the universe from the TRUE astronomers, you should watch this documentary:
    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/program.html

    yours in Christ,

    Heady :-D

  42. Phoenix666 August 15th, 2006 7:00 PM

    Shelley
    I believe in evolution because I personally evolved from a lower life form–I used to be a Republican.
    Please evolve too!

  43. Cal May 27th, 2007 11:02 AM

    I LOVE YOU ALL, YOUR RETARDED CONVICTIONS AMUSE ME!!!!!!! Why are you incapable of rational thinking??? You people speak out against retards and mentally disabled people, yet you are also mentally retarded, since you are not fulfilling the function of using your brain in the correct, rational and logical way….i.e. being ‘good’ at being human, since a the human function is to think rationally with our brains, thats why we have EVOLVED them.

  44. ancelmo October 10th, 2008 10:05 AM

    THEORY COSMOLOGY-GRACELIANA

    cosmo estruturante and desintegrante
    Author – Ancelmo Graceli Luiz.

    Ancelmoluizgraceli@hotmail.com
    Tel. 27- 32167566 Street Itabira, nº 5, Itapemirim Set, Rose of the
    Penha, Cariacica, -269, E.S. cep.29143 Brazilian, professor,
    graduation in philosophy and theoretical researcher. Published books
    ASTRONOMY, and WORLD Of the PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS.

    Collaborator – Marcio Piter Rangel.

    Presented work the SECT- Spirit Brazil Saint. E the Brazilian Society
    of Physics. Introduction published in the WEB for the Vestibule Brazil
    Factor – Channel Profile. In day 30.01.2008. If other theories with
    beddings and you formulate had had acceptance, why these will not
    have? Therefore, it possesss all the beddings and all the forms of
    calculations, and that the reality and the comment until today reached
    are confirmed with. With more than one hundred and ten formulas, the
    most varied forms of if calculating one same phenomenon, with more
    than two hundred beddings in all the areas of the modern physics.
    Also, with new forecasts inside of cosmology and astronomy.

    Presented the Magazine of Education of the SBFISICA. Soced. Bras. de
    Física. Brazilian Journal of Physics – SBFISICA

    In cosmology the universe is defended that if structure as a stream of
    production and destruction of astros. In astronomy it is defended that
    the movement is produced by the proper energy of astro. INTRODUCTION.

    OF THE ALMOST NOTHING EVERYTHING CAN APPEAR – EXCEPT GOD.

    The UNIVERSE Is An AUTO CREATION, HOWEVER, A WORKMANSHIP Of This
    TRANSPORT ALONE CAN HAVE the POWER Of the CREATOR.

    This theory goes of meeting to the harmony and cosmic eternity in
    detriment to the chaos and the finitude of the universe considered for
    the theory of the great explosion. While one enters in stream of
    disintegration and reintegration with little energy, others are born
    more distant from the aglutinação of the dense space.

    COSMO ESTRUTURANTE And DESINTEGRANTE.

    Graceliano Model. The universe is constant and infinite stream.

    First part.

    THEORY Of the BUBBLE OF DENSE SPACE And ENERGY.

    While in the theory of the great explosion the universe if expands
    from a point of the space and a small amount of energy, and is the one
    only – OF OUTSIDE FOR INSIDE – In the theory of the bubble universe if
    it contracts from the dense space to produce the substance and the
    energy of some points of the infinite of the space, in a constant
    production of new universes in some points of cosmo. Or either, it
    contracts itself to produce the substance stops later forming the
    astros and if expanding for the maser. E is some universes in infinite
    points of cosmo in infinite phases.

    Of birth in the phase bubble of dense space – phase estruturante-Na
    energy phase, In the phase of substance and the phase of
    disintegration, unfastening and removal in the space for the proper
    maser of the density of the substance. E reintegration forming
    secondary from the material radiated for the elementary school.

    PASSES FOR FORMATION Of the SUBSTANCE, ELEMENTS, ASTROS And The
    UNIVERSES.

    Thus, the dense space if contracts until to be filamentoso – the
    diffuse substance arrives – dense substance – energy – diffuse cores -
    astros – nuclear fusing – chemical elements – of light elements in
    weighed – maser – reengrupamentos in new astros, secondary – it comes
    back if to disintegrate – and the process continues until if becoming
    diffuse substance.

    COMMENT.

    We do not feel the action of the dense space because we are in a
    universe in a phase that

    already it was changedded into substance.

    FORMULA FOR CONTRACTION OF DENSE SPACE.

    The dense space if contracts and diminishes of size to produce the
    substance, and if it gives in a contraction and infinite reduction,
    that can be calculated with formulates of the infinitesimal limit. But
    one it has all left, divided for all, thus infinitely.

    Dense space ED – total part p dense space if structuralizing. Thus,
    infinitely, until changedding into energy and substance.

    ED – P/ED… until arriving to be energy and substance.

    Thus, we have the formula for formation of the substance, energy and
    for origin of the universe.

    INFINITE UNIVERSES IN PHASES ESTRUTURANTES And DESINTEGRANTES.

    FIRST THEORY Of the ORIGIN And NATURE Of the SUBSTANCE.

    It was always looked by the philosophers and Greek chemistries, later
    for the modern physics an explanation for the origin, nature and
    essence of the substance, where the world at times was divided in form
    and structure, spirit, mind and substance, therefore I show the first
    theory of that the substance can appear and of that it is formed, that
    here is of filaments of dense space, always looked to the substance
    for the substance and dividiz it infinitely of the atom of the Greeks
    until the hundred of particles that they are catalogued today. Comment
    - no theory displayed until today obtained to give a recital from that
    it originated the substance. All leave soon of the estimated one of
    something.

    CALCULATION OF FORMATION OF SUBSTANCE And FOR COSMO ESTRUTURANTE.

    To be able of contraction of the dense space = amount of dense
    space/cosmological time = estruturante substance and cosmo and phases.

    CALCULATION FOR COSMO DESINTEGRANTE.

    To be able of disintegration = amount of substance, temperature,
    fusing core to estelar, maser and energy/cosmological time.

    Pd*[qm ]/t c.

    DENSE SPACE And SUBSTANCE, And ENERGY And ASTROS.

    Universe not formed from great explosion, but yes of space dense,
    space dense is all space that in it surrounds them, that we have the
    notion that it is a great emptiness, but is not, it possesss density,
    and of it the substance and the energy if they had originated to form
    the first astros, galaxies and accumulations.

    ROTATION And TRANSLATION Of the UNIVERSE.

    The expansion is false, is in the truth a translation and rotation and
    a minimum of removal.

    What we have the notion of a great expansion of the universe is in the
    truth the translation and rotation of exactly. Therefore, if it is
    infinitely old and had started if to expand at the moment of supposed
    a great explosion, the astros would be so distant ones of the others
    that nor its light would be capable to be picked-up by any type of
    telescope.

    The FORMAT Of the UNIVERSE.

    The disposal of the galaxies in disks with the systems of stars also
    in disk test that the universe is a estruturação process and passes
    for streams, therefore had appeared at one alone moment in a great
    explosion the format of the universe would be spherical, or either
    with all the astros in one same distancia of a center, and as also
    with the same translation and rotation.

    Comment. Already we have here a recital of the origin and of that
    material cosmo if formed. Beddings not displayed until today for other
    theories.

    The ENERGY PRODUCES the MASER THAT PRODUCES the REMOVAL MINIMUM.

    It has yes a minimum removal proceeding from the action of the maser
    and high temperatures, removal produced for the processed energy for
    nuclear fusing in the inward of the astros.

    UNIVERSE OF ENERGY ESTRUTURANTE. OR UNIVERSE OF CONTRACTION And
    DISINTEGRATION.

    The universe passes for two processes – first of the formation of the
    substance and the energy for the contraction of the filaments of the
    dense space.

    As of the formation of the astros, its processes of energy and
    production of temperature to the ratio that the substance if
    agglutinates, with the agglutinated substance are produced great
    amount of energy and temperature, giving sprouting the maser and the
    consequent disintegration of astro in the space. For that the universe
    is a stream of estruturante energy, where first if it contracts stops
    later if disintegrating and if moving away ones from the others,
    always in lesser portions.

    It is A STREAM WHY IF I CONTRACTED OF DENSE SPACE UNTIL the SUBSTANCE,
    OF SUBSTANCE IN ASTRO, IF IT DISINTEGRATES IN MASER, IT COMES BACK the
    REINTEGRAR-SE IN LESSER ASTROS And WITH LITTLE DIÃMETRO And ENERGY,
    THAT DESINTEGRAR-SE COMES BACK. E STREAM CONTINUES INFINFINITAMENTE.
    UNTIL IF BECOMING DIFFUSE SUBSTANCE.

    The same process passes particles and atoms.

    The PRODUCTION Of SECONDARY For the MASER And the ATMOSPHERE.

    Part of the maser if also transforms into atmosphere, that always goes
    to direct for the equator, where goes to form cinturões of gases as
    it is the Jupiter case, or in a more advanced period of training the
    cinturões go to form rings that is the Saturn case and Uranus, of
    these rings go to form small accumulations of gases, that always more
    will go to agglutinate themselves more and, where will appear the
    first rarefied cores, and the aglutinação process continues, where
    the secondary ones start to appear exactly before if forming, as gases
    they already possess translation and rotation and if they move away
    from the elementary schools. Or either, before existing as astro the
    secondary one already develops its translation.

    TEST For FORMAT And DINÃMICA Of the ATMOSPHERE.

    This can be confirmed with the Land, where its atmosphere already less
    concentrates more in the equator and in the polar regions, proceeding
    from the magnetism of the Land and centrifuga action of the rotation,
    and that the atmosphere possesss proper dynamics. That it will be
    filamentará until arriving to give beginning to a new satellite.
    However this is not for today. The MAGNETISM Of the ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    SPEEDS UP the FORMATION Of the SECONDARY One.

    If it was not the magnetism and the centrifuga action of the rotation
    of the astros, its secondary ones would delay time not to form
    themselves. Therefore the magnetism and action centrifugam act in the
    production of the filaments of gases for the equator and in the
    production of these filaments in the esferificação process, where
    rarefied cores will appear, until forming new astros.

    E the stream continues of disintegration of the elementary school for
    maser proceeding from the energy production, for the production of
    atmosphere and aglutinação in filaments for the magnetism and
    centrifuga action of the rotation of proper astro until arriving the
    esferificação, also through the magnetism of the gases.

    PHASES OF THE STREAM.

    1 – with the contraction of the filaments of the dense space to form
    the substance and after the produced substance if form in astros. With
    the formed astros they pass if to disintegrate as form of maser and
    temperature.

    2- the material of the disintegration comes back if to contract and to
    produce astros lesser, and of these other minors the process
    continues. This if confirms where the astros possess the spherical
    format. Therefore the rounding sample that had a slow process of
    formation through materials that had appeared of are for inside, where
    slowly for aglutinação astro was if structuralizing. They confirm
    because the cores are denser and the Land is formed by layers and
    cores.

    In the case of the production of the planets for the Sun, the
    atmosphere nor arrived if to form, and the maser was soon if
    filamentando to esferificar and to appear the planets.

    INFINITE UNIVERSE In the AGE, the SPACE, And the PROCESSING.

    The esferificação test that astro was produced by layers of material
    of maser for juxtaposition – one on the other, for that the cores are
    denser, that were already proven in the physics of the atom. E the
    rounding test that took much more time this circular formation, then
    the universe is a much more slow and constant process that if can
    imagine. Thus, the rounding of the universe proves the theory of the
    stream and that all the universe of today did not appear at one alone
    moment, they are some universes in some phases if processing and if
    structuralizing, while some age for lose and energy processing, others
    they appear for the dense space. These phases if confirm for the
    current comment, thus the universe are infinite in the origin and the
    end, the space and its processing.

    PHASES OF THE UNIVERSE. UNIVERSES BUBBLE ESTRUTURANTE And FLUXONÁRIO.

    1- Origin – universe bubble of dense space and bubble of energy. 2-
    Type – estruturante fluxonário, if contracts to produce the substance
    from the bubble of the dense space. Later if it after expands the
    contraction and production of energy, temperature and maser. 3- Form
    to exist – production processes energy. 4- Amount – some types in some
    phases, of the bubble until astro almost without energy. 5- Size -
    infinite in the production of new universes, the infinite in the space
    and the time. 6- Form – infinite and varied forms, of bubbles, gases,
    diffuse energy, dense and less dense substance, astros, rings, maser,
    atmosphere, etc. 7- estruturante of the substance and cosmo.

    MAGICAL CREATION – SUBSTANCE From The DENSE SPACE.

    Before if speaking of the creation of the universe, it must be spoken
    of the creation of the energy and the substance, therefore it was from
    the substance that appeared the astros.

    ROUNDING And ESFERIFICAÇÃO Of the ASTROS.

    The esferificação of astros the test that,

    1- It was formed for a slow process to have the spherical format, of
    the the opposite it would not be.

    2- It was formed of minimum parts that had been if joust locating to
    form astro, of the the opposite would not have the round formation.
    One sees that while Saturn and Uranus possesss rings of gases in the
    route of the equator, Jupiter it possesss an atmosphere stack that is
    in movement in the route of the equator, where if confirms the origin
    of the astros for components of the elementary school.

    3- the astros are older of the one than if it thinks. E its core is
    denser of the one than the exterior part, and the planet Land is
    formed by formed layers on.

    4- Fiz a calculation for the age of the Land, however was taken in
    account only the removal, and not it time for the esferificação,
    that probably was very bigger.

    5- Test that the universe has its origin through very small elements,
    that had been if joining to form the astros, as minimum parts of
    maser, gases, light and leftovers of great temperatures.

    6- the universe is had There if forming for minimum parts, as energy
    and substance, of inside for exterior part is with the cores denser
    than the crust -. A much more old, round and infinite universe in the
    end and origin time, the infinite in relation its production, then,
    that it would never appear at one alone moment in a great explosion.

    MASER IN THE FORMATION OF SECONDARY.

    Thus, with the format of the astros if it has plus a test of the
    theory of the estruturante fluxonário universe. For compression of
    the dense space, and disintegration for the maser and temperature, and
    a new compression of this maser in the space, forming new lesser
    astros, as planets, satellites and comets. E the estruturante and
    desintegrante process continues producing asteroids and others that
    will always be disintegrated producing astros and lesser asteroids.

    Universes alone of dense space, gases, energy, diffuse substance,
    substance exist and astros and gases, light and maser, with this if it
    confirms the theory here supported of that the universe does not have
    age, therefore it is an infinite production and disintegration of
    itself exactly. E while some disintegrate others in other points of
    the infinite of the space starts if to form slowly for the dense
    space.

    If cosmo was produced at one alone moment, the astros would not have a
    spherical form so defined, some would be long and flattened others.

    ON The DENSE SPACE, SUBSTANCE And ENERGY.

    The energy exists in function of the substance, since its production
    until its carrier also for air, therefore the substance contains and
    produze the energy, therefore the energy does not have as to exist
    without the substance, and the substance if originates and is
    densificado dense space.

    SUBSTANCE And ENERGY = DENSE SPACE DENSIFICADO.

    It does not have as to speak of a universe that if it originates from
    a small ball in a great explosion, therefore which the origin of this
    ball, and gives where came the energy for explodiz it.

    The great explosion contains varies contradictions and lack of origin
    beddings, cause and effect.

    INTERPLANETARY And SPACE ATMOSPHERE.

    The interplanetary space is constituted of gas to one [ pressure of
    ten raised to less 19 terrestrial atmospheres ]. That is a route that
    the space is not an emptiness without density, pressure, and is not a
    vacuum.

    PLEA. If the gravitation attracted the astros, all the satellites
    would be plumb between the planet and the Sun, therefore the planet
    would hold of a side and the Sun of another one, and would be
    constantly in eclipse. Therefore that the dynamics depends on the
    energy and maser of astro. To see theory of the energeticidade and
    maser.

    THUS WE HAVE THE PHASES OF THE UNIVERSE.

    The filamentosa space phase of density. The energy phase space
    filamentosa. The phase of the materiality – chemical atoms, and
    elements. The phase of immense astros, with little density, and little
    maser. The phase of the aglutinação, where the substance was if
    agglutinating, magnifying the internal temperature and the maser. The
    phase of the disintegration for the internal temperature and maser.
    The phase of formation of new astros for the aglutinação of the
    expelled material of the maser of the first astros, thus we see that
    it is a stream and process of integration, disintegration and new
    aglutinações.

    DIRECT FORMATION For The DENSE SPACE, And FORMATION OF SECONDARY For
    The FORMED SUBSTANCE ALREADY.

    The material that already became astro after does not come back to be
    dense space the disintegration, but this material if integrates
    forming new lesser astros.

    Thus it has two processes. 1- the process of direct formation for the
    dense space. 2- and the process for the disintegration of astro
    already produced, that it goes to reintegrate themselves and to form
    other minors.

    Thus, the dense space is an immense one all, as an immense jelly
    without definite form. The universe is a process of direct form for
    the dense space, and a cycle process, where some are disintegrated and
    part of its material goes to construct others. With this we see that
    the origin, production and time of the universe are infinite, and the
    system of production of universes is much more old of that if it
    imagines, in trillions of years.

    E that exists some types of universes, ones of dense space, field of
    energy without substance, field of energy with substance, universes of
    atomic cores, gases, substance and astros if disintegrating and
    integrating others.

    COSMIC EVOLUTION And EVOLUTION Of The CHEMICAL ELEMENTS.

    Thus, the universe is a constant production and of cosmic evolution,
    direct production and disintegration, and secondary production of
    integration in new astros, while the chemical elements go if
    processing and evolving.

    ON the REMOVAL.

    The universe did not suffer a great explosion to produce its removal,
    but yes, the removal is product of the maser, rotation and of the
    great temperatures, that stimulate the astros for front, modifying its
    orbit. Or either, the nuclear fusing, the production of temperature
    and maser produce the lowermost removal between the astros. For that
    it has a ratio enters the distancias of the planets and satellites.

    PLEA.

    If the universe had suffered to a great explosion alone the galaxies
    would be if moving away, and the lesser astros as planets, comets and
    satellites would not be if moving away, and the gradual removal proves
    that all the astros if find in removal ones in relation to the others,
    thus, all the astros if they find in removal proceeding from its
    energy, maser and external temperature.

    PLEA.

    APPEARANCE To the RED For the EFFECT DOPPLER For the ROTATION And
    TRANSLATION Of the COSMO.

    The front that the universe does not meet in expansion, but yes in
    minimum removal will be seen more, and what it is detected as
    appearance to the red nor it is this removal. Therefore it is
    insignificant in whom he refers to to the shift in the space, and what
    it gives the appearance to the red in Doppler effect is the shift of
    the translation and rotation of astros and galaxies in the space.

    REMOVAL FOR THE ACTION OF THE MASER.

    We see then that, the universe is a constant creation for filaments of
    dense space of new new substances and the cosmos for the aglutinação
    of the casting and reintegrated materials already, while other cosmos
    more evolved if disintegrates for maser and high temperature, other
    lesser astros if they integrate with the material of that already they
    had been disintegrated and that they go to develop a next orbit to
    that gave to origin and initial impulse to it, for the maser and
    intense temperature. Thus one forms a direct production for the dense
    space, and a production for cycle of disintegration and integration
    for the disintegrated material, while the chemical elements evolve. E,
    while the universe if widens for the maser produced for the proper
    astros. E not for supposed a great explosion, therefore the removal is
    a process continues for the action of the maser, therefore that it
    decreases gradually and the initial impulse only tends to lose
    intensity. While the material universe if expands, the universe of
    filaments of the dense space if contracts, or either, it has two
    reverse situations.

    The maser is proceeding mainly from the interactions of nuclear fusing
    in the inward of the astros. Or either, the same phenomenon – the
    maser – that it produces the orbit and the dynamics of the planets and
    satellites, also produces the widening of the universe and produces
    new astros, and is the producer of the structure of them, and of new
    chemical elements. One concludes thus, that cosmo is infinite in its
    origin and will be in its future, as also he is infinite in the space
    and the new production of the cosmos, and new chemical elements. The
    process of slow creation goes against the process of instantaneous
    creation considered by the great explosion. To prove the displayed
    thesis above it is simple, is alone to evidence that the expansion if
    finds in decreasing progression. However as already it was seen, the
    universe if finds in production and removal and not in expansion.
    Thus, while one is disintegrated and gone to produce others in other
    cantos of the universe the dense space if it processes giving to
    origin the galaxies of space gases. Thus, the universe is a process of
    direct birth for the dense space, of already been born, and birth of
    born others from already. Everything occurs for a direct hashing of
    the substance in the origin, is a fluxonária hashing in the
    production of new chemical elements, new astros and new orbits. Second
    part.

    ON the SUBSTANCE.

    M = ED = and/t – substance is equal the solidiquicado dense space,
    that is equal to the energy divided for the time.

    The substance is made solid energy dense space, or either, the
    chemical particles and elements are in the truth the dense space if
    processing energeticamente and producing solidification. E in a more
    advanced evolutivo period of training. Thus, the substance passes for
    a evolutivo process, and the substance – made solid energy dense space
    - always meets in an improvement, and passes for a slow and unified
    process therefore that all the substance and the structure of the atom
    are equal.

    PHASES OF FORMATION OF THE ASTROS.

    Our universe did not initiate lowermost previous to a great explosion,
    but yes, infinitely great, entering in a contraction to produce the
    substance, passing for made solid energy that is the substance, it
    stops later structuralizing itself in particles, elements chemical,
    and finally astros.

    Or either, the universe did not form astros instantaneamente,
    therefore that the astros and atoms possess cores.

    First it is formed energy, later the substance and finally the astros,
    different of that it defends the great explosion.

    Thus, the universe passes of the contraction. 1- of the space for
    energy and the substance. 2- of the substance for astros.

    After the disintegration through the maser and intense temperatures.
    It passes to the integration, where new astros are formed from the
    material of the maser. Thus, the universe and a stream of production
    cycles and estruturação and evolution, through. 1 – Contraction and
    solidification. 2 – Chemical evolution. 3 – Disintegration, removal
    and dynamics of the universe for the energy and maser. 4 – E
    integration in new astros.

    E that the orbit, the dynamics, the removal and the disintegration of
    the universe are proceeding from the energy and maser, becoming the
    universe of flattened structure, where the astros already are
    structuralized and in gradual removal as he is ours, while others are
    to circulate and in formation through gases, and others with
    tentáculos as great galaxies.

    COSMOFÍSICA and ASTROPHYSICS.

    PRODUCER OF ITSELF.

    The universe is an alive and dynamic system of production and
    estruturação, where it produces its proper energy for its
    functioning, estruturação and dynamics, being that the energy
    magnifies to the ratio that goes carrying through its functioning, and
    is a stream system, where the same interaction that produces the
    elements chemical, produces the astros for fusing. E also produces
    fields, maser, high temperatures, dynamics, orbits, structures of the
    astros, and the removal in the universe. Or either, it is a producer
    of itself, its structure and its functioning. Thus, it is a constant
    production of integration and disintegration.

    AGE OF THE UNIVERSE.

    With this, it can be deduced that the universe does not possess an
    origin determined in the time, much less in some place of the space,
    and it does not possess an origin determined in the estruturação of
    the substance and the astros that compose it. However, it has infinite
    age, therefore the dense space always was there and producing energy,
    substance, until arriving the astros.

    FORM OF BEING OF THE UNIVERSE

    Of contraction for the dense space. Of removal for the maser.
    Of aglutinação for the material of the maser.

    The universe passes for streams while it produces the chemical
    elements in the interactions of nuclear fusing in the center of the
    astros, where produces energy when processing the physical
    interactions and to produce its structure of astros, orbits and
    dynamics.

    ON the MOVEMENT

    If the related movement this with the maser, high
    temperatures, and physical interactions in the inward of the astros
    that are untied in the dense space to develop its dynamics. Soon the
    movement is natural and dynamic, and varies as the situations of
    energy production where if it finds astro. E if the dynamics obey a
    stream, then the movement is dynamic, disforme and variable.

    ON The DENSE SPACE.

    Dense space produces the substance, while the produced substance
    already produces the astros and the chemical elements go being casting
    in the secondary stars and.

    ON the SUBSTANCE

    The substance is filaments of the contracted dense space, that
    go to structuralize the chemical universe in substance, astros,
    elements, maser, high temperature, and in the dynamic auto universe.

    ON the COSMO

    The universe is auto dynamic and while it produces the energy
    the physical interactions go being processed, and the maser acting and
    spreading the substance, the astros are in dynamics for the proper
    energy and maser, the chemical elements evolve and if they improve,
    improving the substance and structuralizing the universe, cosmo if
    contracts for the dense space, and if it widens for the action of the
    maser, then the universe is alive and auto dynamic.

    ON the TIME

    The time does not exist, what it exists is the timer of the
    memory marked for the functioning of the brain as conscience form of
    that happens between intervals of events. We can consider the
    secondary time as something, that it exists in function of the
    functioning of the conscience produced for the functioning of the
    brain. The speed of the timer of the man is the speed of functioning
    of the human brain.

    ON the REMOVAL And WIDENING Of the COSMO.

    Thus, the dynamics of the universe is proceeding from the constant
    maser, therefore that its widening if finds in decreasing progression.
    E the astros had appeared of the aglutinação of the dense space,
    while the maser and the high temperatures disintegrate the astros.
    Soon in the future and this part and period of training of the
    universe where in we find them the astros will be more cold and
    lesser.

Leave a reply






Shelley The Republican : For God, America and George W. Bush