STR † THE FREEDOM BLOG©



Free Glenn Beck

American Freedom : Project IRAQ

Dear Friends,
there are some whiny liberals out there still criticizing the war in Iraq! They still don’t see how much good America is doing in Iraq. Howard Dean is now claiming that the US can not win the war and John Kerry actually accuses our dear soldiers of being terrorists themselves! Both are hurting the moral of the troops badly and both are undermining the war on terror and basically verbally fight on the side of the terrorists.
Just to get the facts straight: We are winning the war against the terrorist killers! We are building schools, we are bringing them electricity, we are building streets and help them built churches, but most of all, we are bringing them freedom, liberty and justice! May I remind you of what the justice system in Iraq was before? Please read the article: “Get to know your enemy: ISLAM” for more info about this. And now take a look at the new constitution of Iraq. Examples as follow:


CHAPTER ONE – FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES

Article 1.
(B) Gender-specific language shall apply equally to male and female.

Article 14.
The individual has the right to security, education, health care, and social security. The Iraqi State and its governmental units, including the federal government, the regions, governorates, municipalities, and local administrations, within the limits of their resources and with due regard to other vital needs, shall strive to provide prosperity and employment opportunities to the people.

Article 15.
(A) No civil law shall have retroactive effect unless the law so stipulates. There shall be neither a crime, nor punishment, except by law in effect at the time the crime is committed.(B) Police, investigators, or other governmental authorities may not violate the sanctity of private residences, whether these authorities belong to the federal or regional governments, governorates, municipalities, or local administrations, unless a judge or investigating magistrate has issued a search warrant in accordance with applicable law on the basis of information provided by a sworn individual who knew that bearing false witness would render him liable to punishment. Extreme exigent circumstances, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, may justify a warrantless search, but such exigencies shall be narrowly construed. In the event that a warrantless search is carried out in the absence of an extreme exigent circumstance, the evidence so seized, and any other evidence found derivatively from such search, shall be inadmissible in connection with a criminal charge, unless the court determines that the person who carried out the warrantless search believed reasonably and in good faith that the search was in accordance with the law.(C) No one may be unlawfully arrested or detained, and no one may be detained by reason of political or religious beliefs.

(D) All persons shall be guaranteed the right to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, regardless of whether the proceeding is civil or criminal. Notice of the proceeding and its legal basis must be provided to the accused without delay.

(E) The accused is innocent until proven guilty pursuant to law, and he likewise has the right to engage independent and competent counsel, to remain silent in response to questions addressed to him with no compulsion to testify for any reason, to participate in preparing his defense, and to summon and examine witnesses or to ask the judge to do so. At the time a person is arrested, he must be notified of these rights.

So, you tell me: Is Iraq better off now or not? If you are a hardcore liberal you will deny that the Iraqis are better off now only because of your own political gain! That is tragic and proves once more that liberals/democ-rats are just and only concerned with their own political agenda! For that and only for that reason liberals also claiming that there are abuses and even torture in prisons in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay. That is false and a cruel and dirty lies! Our soldiers are acting according the highest standards and moral: The AMERICAN WAY!


60 years ago we invaded Germany and helped them to overcome the nazi plague and now Germany is a stable and free country (although they could be a better friend – see article “
Europe: Friends or Foe“, but that’s another story). Now we are doing the same in Iraq, bringing them the great American way of life. That is the best thing ever happened to Iraq. God bless America, god bless our great, loving and compassionate soldiers fighting for freedom and democracy for everybody on this World!
Thanks for taking the time to read this article. Please spread the truth my friends!
Yours,
Shelley

Share This Post 44 comments

44 Comments so far

  1. Thomes December 14th, 2005 9:32 AM

    Hi Shelley!
    I`m from Austria (part of the “coward” and “old” europe), I see that everybody who has an other opinion than you can`t made a comment – why?
    So you don`t have many comments at your website…maybe there are not many us-americans with your point of view? I hope it.

  2. Shelley December 14th, 2005 11:34 AM

    You are a liar, Thomes!
    I have many comments from people with other opinions. If you actually read the comments you will see that. Plus, I do have many comments on my website. Over 50 so far.

    AND: Most Americans share my opinion. That is why Bush won in 2000 and he won in 2004 and that is why the next President will be republican, too, you coward!!!

  3. Thomes December 14th, 2005 2:30 PM

    Sorry, I thought that you controll all comments because you get a bad feedback. Which kind of comment would be censored?

    Can you explain me something? The USA starts the war against Iraq, why should Europe help? It`s your war, or?
    What is the link between Iraq and 9/11?
    Or which kind of freedom is in danger?
    Do you know more about Europe except some things about the second world war and a few chliches?

  4. Shelley December 14th, 2005 2:38 PM

    Only comments that contain personal insults or the bad words (f. / s. / c. ) will be cencored/deleted.

    Of course there is a good, a very good reason for the war in Iraq.

    Saddam was a direct threat to the USA and other contries on the planet. He had WWD’s, he used WWD’s, he was a brutal dictator.

    And who are you to judge if there was a reason for the war? Our great president GWB had the intellegence and he deceided to go to war! And we Americans support that!

    Why do you question the US-Government but not your own sources for information?

    Did you ever think about that the European governments had reasons to deny that Iraq was a threat? They denied it, because they did not want to lose money and soldiers in this war. And once again, the mighty USA was going in and making all the sacrifices just to make the world a better place to live for ALL OF US!!!!

  5. Thomes December 14th, 2005 3:00 PM

    A very fast answer…

    But where are the WWD`s?
    Why didn?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥t he use it against the USA?

    The government in Austria can`t send troops in Iraq because the majority
    is against the war (–> democracy).
    The people here don`t believe that the iraq had after 1990 WWD`s or that there was a link between 9/11 and Hussein.

    Where I get my information?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s?
    I speak a bit English… so I tried do understand the american point of view (NewYorkTimes, CNN, a few blogs from american soldiers, brandonblog.com etc.)
    But I`m sure that many people in the USA/Europe think that they get more objective information?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s than the other side.

  6. Shelley December 15th, 2005 12:39 AM

    But where are the WWD`s?
    Why didn?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥t he use it against the USA?

    I don’t know where they are. They are hidem them somewhere.
    He did not use them, because we were already in his country. So by using them he would have to bomb his own contry!

    The government in Austria can`t send troops in Iraq because the majority
    is against the war (–> democracy). The people here don`t believe that the iraq had after 1990 WWD`s or that there was a link between 9/11 and Hussein.

    You call it democracy, I call it misinformation. Austrians are not aware of the threat that Iraq is to the rest of the world.

    Where I get my information?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s?
    I speak a bit English… so I tried do understand the american point of view (NewYorkTimes, CNN, a few blogs from american soldiers, brandonblog.com etc.)
    But I`m sure that many people in the USA/Europe think that they get more objective information?¢‚Ǩ?°?É‚Äû?ɬ¥s than the other side.

    Listen: The NYTimes, CNN and others are extreme leftwinger, anti-christian, anti-american news sources!

    Try these sites/stations for REAL news:

    http://www.michaelsavage.com/
    http://www.foxnews.com/
    http://newsmax.com/
    and:

    http://www.shelleytherepublican.com/

  7. Thomes December 15th, 2005 7:36 AM

    “I don’t know where they are. They are hidem them somewhere.
    He did not use them, because we were already in his country. So by using them he would have to bomb his own contry!”

    And why did he hide the WWD`s?
    President Bush said recently that he got false informations from the CIA. So its also possible that there have never been WWD`s in Iraq.

    “You call it democracy, I call it misinformation. Austrians are not aware of the threat that Iraq is to the rest of the world.”

    That sounds a bit unrealistic. In my region I have the choice between more than 10 newspapers. The question is: how many different medias are in the rest of Europe?
    And all make nothing other than misinformation? Why?

    “Listen: The NYTimes, CNN and others are extreme leftwinger, anti-christian, anti-american news sources!”

    They only have an other opinion about Iraq. NYT, CNN & Co. stand also for a part of the US-americans.
    You must realize what you say!
    An example: I suppose that you don`t really like Michael Moore.
    But he selled millions of his books in the USA. And millions whatch his move Fahrenheit 9/11 – so millions of US-Americans are Anti-US-Americans!?

  8. Teenage Bamm-Bamm December 15th, 2005 8:47 AM

    Shelley, I appreciate your support for the troops, but why are you using only pictures of GAY soldiers in your post? Pictures of soldiers hugging each other, playing with kittens, sniffing perfumed letters…being a gay ex-soldier myself, I KNOW there are plenty of gays in the military, but it’s supposed to stay a secret!

  9. Shelley December 15th, 2005 2:51 PM

    “- so millions of US-Americans are Anti-US-Americans!?”

    YES THOMES. UNFORTUNATELY MILLIONS OF AMERICANS ARE VERY VERY UN-AMERICAN. THOSE ARE CALLED LIBERALS!!!!
    THEY WORK VERY HARD TO DESTROY AMERICA EVERY DAY! BUT REPUBLICANS WILL BUT THEM FROM NOT ON IN EVERY RESPECT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  10. Shelley December 15th, 2005 2:52 PM

    Teenage Bamm-Bamm,
    HOW DARE YOU CALL THOSE GREAT, BRAVE SOLIEDS GAY????!!!!
    That is an insult of the highest order!
    Please take that back right now!

  11. Shelley December 15th, 2005 2:53 PM

    sorry.. I mean SOLDIERS!
    Only because a man prays or helps children and takes care of a cat does not mean that he is a GAY!!!

  12. Teenage Bamm-Bamm December 15th, 2005 3:38 PM

    How is it an insult? I was in the army, I am gay – are you saying I was not a good soldier? If so, you are insulting our troops. YOU, the Queen of the Republicans! Say it isn’t so!

  13. Shelley December 15th, 2005 3:42 PM

    It’s just wrong to call them gay.
    I am very sure they are not gay. Those are strong, proud and honest Americans, risking their lives for all of us.. No way that they are gay…
    Listen, the men you see on the pictures on my blog are real soldiers not some medics or maids or nurses or something like that.
    No, please stop insulting the troops. You liberals just don’t know when to stop!

  14. Teenage Bamm-Bamm December 16th, 2005 8:14 AM

    Careful, you’re about to lead everyone into a shocking self-revelation….that being that you CAN’T TELL who’s gay and who’s not! Shocking! How can you be bigoted when you can’t be sure of who to hate? I’m ex-army, I work in a Church AND I’m a teacher, trust me, we’re EVERYWHERE and you don’t even know it!

  15. Anonymous December 16th, 2005 10:37 AM

    Greetings from San Francisco:

    Freedom for who? Halliburton? Bechtel? Oil companies? Artificial limb manufacturers? Body bag business?…Certainly not for the middle class or the lower middle class of this nation. You should be ashamed to support a Bush regime who kills innocent iraqui civilians, at least 100,000. Is this an example of Republican Pro-Life? Guess not. Well, I am not a Democratic supporter either because they are much in line with Republicans. Kerry was not the answer but neither is Bush.
    Happy Hollidays..Not Merry Christmas.

  16. Shelley December 16th, 2005 1:16 PM

    Teenage Bamm-Bamm,
    thank god it’s relatively easy to spot a gay. Mostly they talk like the british or they let their hands dangeling from the wrist like there is some kind of problem. Or they wear make up, or they have huge mustaches and wear leather, something like that.
    They can do whatever they do as long as they don’t touch our children and corrupt our society, OK?

  17. Shelley December 16th, 2005 1:18 PM

    Merry CHRISTmas, Anonymous!
    FREEDOM FOR YOU, TOO, Anonymous!
    YOU ARE A COWARD, Anonymous!
    WHY DON’T YOU USE YOUR NAME, Anonymous?
    What a shame this is.
    My god, I have to go offline now. It just turn my stomach, this bullsh*t comments.

  18. Anonymous December 16th, 2005 4:26 PM

    Revolutionary Greetings Shelly:

    I havent had time to register yet, thats why Im still anonymous. Anyway Im not surprised you didnt make any comments about what I said. I need to go right now to buy a nice Holliday tree. Not a Christmas tree.
    Regards.

  19. Shelley December 16th, 2005 4:32 PM

    I don’t see any real question.
    Yes, a happy HOLLLIDAY to you, too!

  20. Anonymous December 21st, 2005 10:47 AM

    You said: “I don’t know where they are. They are hidem them somewhere.
    He did not use them, because we were already in his country. So by using them he would have to bomb his own contry!” Well Saddam used biological weapons to kill the Kurds in Iraq, HIS own country, thus he wouldn’t have hesitated. Look, blindfolded brainwashed fanatic, Iraq had NO WMD’s and the President wanted to go to Iraq out of a cowboy vendetta “He trah’d to keel mah Daddeh” (in Fake Texas drawl, since the Fake Cowboy Prez is NOT a Southerner, he was born in NEW HAVEN, Connecticut, thus a Damn Yankee, you fool!!

    Bobby Joe

  21. Bobby Joe December 21st, 2005 10:52 AM

    You said: “YES THOMES. UNFORTUNATELY MILLIONS OF AMERICANS ARE VERY VERY UN-AMERICAN. THOSE ARE CALLED LIBERALS!!!!
    THEY WORK VERY HARD TO DESTROY AMERICA EVERY DAY! BUT REPUBLICANS WILL BUT THEM FROM NOT ON IN EVERY RESPECT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!” Did JFK try to destroy America?? Did Thomas Jefferson try to destroy America? did FDR try to destroy America? and Truman too? those were liberals

    Bobby Joe

  22. Shelley December 21st, 2005 11:09 AM

    Oh yes, the good old times, right?
    You can’t compare that! These are differenct times, different conditions!

  23. Tristan Shuddery December 23rd, 2005 5:48 PM

    Oh yes, the good old times, right?
    You can’t compare that! These are differenct times, different conditions!

    Absolutely! Even in our darkest hour of the 2nd world war was never this bad. Japan for example would never have resorted to suicide attacks. Hitler did not have weapons of mass destruction. What I am trying to say is that we are facing unprecedented danger.

    I am personally sickend that the house refused to pass the patriot act. What the hell kind of liberal dope were they smoking… dont they know we are at war and in a warzone (which unfortunately is what the USA has become) we have to give up some civil liberties.

    Some buddies of mine work for the Air-Force, and althaugh they cannot talk in detail, they tell me that the powers of the patriot act have saved literlay millions of american lives. If only we were allowed to know about it, every American would be clamouring for a permanent Patriot Act.

    If we divided the number of people who the patriot act saved by the number of congress-people who voted against it thats how many murders each of those evil democratic congress people could have been guilty of.

    Now I know our president is a praying man. God told him what to do in Iraq – and now look at how much better it is for the average Iraqui. They have never had so much freedom in Iraq. The Iraqis love having our soldiers on their streets because they know we are fighting Al-Queda on their behalf.

    G.W. prayed again, and this time God told him that we needed the patriot act, so we should just trust and respect our president okay?

    I just dont get it… the act is called the “Patriot Act”, so voting against it must be unpatriotic. How come those liberals couldnt figure that one out?

    Who are you going to belive in the long run, a president who gets his orders from God or some senators and congress-men who have been elected by athiests. In my bible God reigns supreme, and thats the way its allways going to be.

    Now I get sick when I hear people criticize the president for spying on Americans. Like Shelley I confront them and remind them that he didnt have time to deal with stupid activist judges (like the FISA wiretap court), and that he has the mandate from the peole and God do do exactly what he feels is best in order to defend our way of life.

  24. Ann April 18th, 2006 3:03 AM

    What in the world are you smoking? You say that the Iraqis want our soldiers over there? Where in the world are you getting that? The overwhelming majority of them want us OUT of there.

    You say that the Iraqis have never had so much freedom. There is death and destruction every day over there under our hand. We have killed over 100,000 innocents in Bush’s quest. A great many of the women and little children killed by our hand. Iraqi men carrying little mangled bodies of their children out of the rubble of their homes that WE bombed. And we wonder why there is an insurgency. Any loving parent would have a seething resentment at anyone who did that to their child. 100,000 dead and counting. How can you justify this? Killing innocents is a godless act. But that is ok with you because you believe that Bush is a praying man and the little voices in his head told him what to do. If God was behind this we would have already achieved victory. We haven’t achieved victory. Every day more and more of our young men and women die, and countless more innocents die. May God have mercy on us for what we have done.

  25. Ann April 18th, 2006 3:29 AM

    Shelley, I see a great many posts on here with curse words. Why are those posts allowed?

  26. John April 21st, 2006 10:07 AM

    Hey I see in their constitution the Iraqi government has to provide their people with free healthcare. It’s amazing every western country but ours has free health care and even our tax dollars go to Iraqis so they can have free healthcare. Don’t you think Shelley that is a commie socialist european idea that we set their government up with free healthcare or could it be our government has Americans fooled into thinking free healthcare is bad but the rest of the world knows better

  27. Shelley April 21st, 2006 10:46 AM

    I agree with you, John.
    I don’t like that part at all, but if they choose to have universal health care, so be it. They can have it. Here in the USA I am opposed 100%.
    I stand for more personal responsibility!!!

  28. Nanette April 22nd, 2006 10:51 AM

    Shelley, you want more personal responsibility. I have a question. How can the working poor afford to buy health insurance? It takes every penny they make to put food on their tables and keep shelter over their heads. If they get sick it is a financial catastrophe. Either they accrue a debt that they can’t pay or they die. Our system is a mess. My daughter is a nurse and she sees all to often what happens under our current medical system. People cannot afford preventative care, and they let simple health issues go until their conditions are critical. We need to have a system where all people can get the preventative care that they need so the high cost of treating them after they become critical can be avoided. It makes good economic sense in the long run.

  29. Anonymous April 22nd, 2006 11:36 AM

    Damn whyni LIB! SO, POOR PEOPLE WIL DIE! WHAT DO I CARE? IT’S THE NATURAL SELECTION. ITS GOOD FOR MANKIND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  30. Nanette April 22nd, 2006 11:50 AM

    God help you. Would you have approved if the Good Samaritan had left that poor man beside the road to die? You have proved that the conservatives don’t care about anyone but their own. That is the utter lack of goodness and morality. It certainly is NOT Christian is it? You are evil in most extreme way.

  31. Ann April 22nd, 2006 1:11 PM

    My God. Natural selection? Are you out of your mind? You are putting human beings on the same level as insects. You are totally insane!

  32. Shelley April 22nd, 2006 2:57 PM

    I don’t agree exactly with the visitors comment, but I also think that a certain degree of natural selection could be very healthy for mankind/society.
    The nature’s way of selecting the strongest is not only for insects, Ann.

  33. Pete April 26th, 2006 9:17 PM

    Shelley:
    “thank god it’s relatively easy to spot a gay. Mostly they talk like the british or they let their hands dangeling from the wrist like there is some kind of problem. Or they wear make up, or they have huge mustaches and wear leather, something like that.
    They can do whatever they do as long as they don’t touch our children and corrupt our society, OK?”

    Ha, ha! Now I *know* that this site is a joke. Surely nobody could *really* be this ignorant.

    “Talk like the british” – classic!

  34. Anonymous April 27th, 2006 4:47 AM

    Shelley:
    “thank god it’s relatively easy to spot a gay. Mostly they talk like the british or they let their hands dangeling from the wrist like there is some kind of problem. Or they wear make up, or they have huge mustaches and wear leather, something like that.”

    The popular TV series called C.O.P.S. was on our TV (in Finland) few years ago. On every episode i spotted several gay american police officers as over 3/4 of them had HUGE mustaches.

    I am truly sorry for you, it must be very hard for a smart human being like you to be protected and served by gay people with huge mustaches.

  35. Shaun April 28th, 2006 10:05 AM

    2 Problems with the war in iraq.

    1. Congress voted to give Bush the budget, but did not actually make a declaration of war. Thus, Bush went to war without proper authorization.

    2. Preemptive warfare is the reason why Hitler invaded poland. That makes for a very slippery slope.

    The primary concern I have with Bush is that he is not upholding the constitution. If he were, he would not have gone to war without a formal declaration. I know he didn’t because I heard a Republican representitive speak. He was the person who put forward an ammendment to the war funding bill that would have made it a proper declaration of war as well. It was voted down (no declaration of war).

    Second, his policy on no child left behind is not constitutional. Under Article I. Section 8. of the constitution a very specific list of responsibilities is given to congress. A department of education is not listed among them. The 10th ammendment states that any powers not specificly given to the federal government in the constitution are reserved to the states or to the people. If he were upholding the constitution in his oath of office he would be removing the federal department of education. Not asking congress to pass no child left behind.

    Shaun

    PS: I was a republican, but what I really am is a Constituionalist. It is not outdated and would work if we used it as designed.

  36. Eike May 8th, 2006 2:11 PM

    Shelly, Shelly, Shelly can’t you have ONE point of view instead of x??? OK let’s compare a little bit together.
    “60 years ago we invaded Germany and helped them to overcome the nazi plague and now Germany is a stable and free country” that’s right *respect*!!!!
    But… what did you say in another blog?? you know which I mean.. Yeah right the blog in which you call us Germans “the Gate to Hell” very diplomatic btw

    Eike
    If you want to discuss eikekuehn@web.de

    and btw i seldom had more fun reading than reading your blogs congratulation

  37. Shelley May 8th, 2006 2:17 PM

    Yes. Stable and free.. SO? What is your point.
    You are free to hunt african Germans and you are stable enough to plan your next attack on the world.
    shameful!
    Shelley

  38. Anonymous May 10th, 2006 7:40 AM

    HAHA! I never had so much fun to read such a site… :D Where you live?? That you didn`t realize so far , that Hitler is dead since 60 years. Perhaps come here an visit us. Than you can see how the world realy looks. Than you can drive a Mercedes or a Volkswagen and can see, that they are realy good cars. Look at the car you great president drives: Its a Mercedes…
    Dont speak about things you dont know! ;) have a good day, from Germany…

  39. Anonymous May 17th, 2006 9:09 AM

    dear shelley,

    i read your article about germany and also the things you say about iraq… the link below shows you something about the “freedom” gwb brings the civil persons in iraq…

    http://www.bushflash.com/year.html

    i come from germany and i never read so horrible things about germany than on your site… what you are doing is desinformation and lie… nobody here is interested in a new world war… i?m not proud of the bloody past of germany and 99% of the germans too… and in the end americans and britains made our country “ugly” by bombing the towns after the war was over and killed millions of innocent people…. hitler is past!!! and 60 years ago…

    what should i say … i?m afraid of americans … of people like you … may god help us that unholy people like gwb don?t be the end of our world…

    yours robert

    ps.:please excuse my english

  40. jess May 24th, 2006 5:07 PM

    Shelly, you are rude, hateful, intolerant of other peoples comments, anti free speech, and are calling all the people who disagree with you liars, and are using words like BS in ur posts. It hurts me that you are behaving this way. It just proves that youre not a true Christain. If you were, you wouldnt sear at people like that. Where are your ethics? Where are your values? Why dont you relax a little bit and stop calling people names. This is a free country..but you are going against that very principle.

  41. Sarah May 28th, 2006 8:17 AM

    Hi Shelly, where are u living? On the moon or why do u have no idea what’s going on?

  42. GreYcell June 2nd, 2006 6:02 AM

    republicants are the worse kind of humans, they are barely humans. how in god’s hell can you justify thier supportr of the corrupt egyptian regieme led by hosni mubarak. and even if it was of americas straight forward interest to help ass holes like mubarak aren’t they thinking of the millions of egyptians that will hate you for it, where do you think terrorists come from, the moon. the guy has been in power for 25 years, if jesus christ himself was alive i wouldn’t recommend him to rule any country for 25 years, that alone should be a sign of mubarak’s tyranny, but no rupublicants think of the rest of the world as stuff, not people stuff , things, and ask them selves how do we manipulate the world, am all for every country going after its interests, but interests is when you negogiate a deal with a thinrd world country where you become the monopole of oil digging in thier country, that would be the third world’s government’s fault, but supporting someone like that just shows you what G W. bush would do for his benifit, yeah go ahead give support and financial aid tyo a government that tore of the clothes of a reporter “female” and took her to the police dept made a prostiution offense agnaist her and threw her in the street and told the poeple in the street “????? ??? ?? ??? ???????” roughly translated that would be “we will beat the crap out of anyone who helps her”. yeah sure what a great guy bush.

  43. Informed June 27th, 2006 8:02 PM

    As Americans you owe it to yourself and your country to atleast watch this. You must relize that there are always 2 sides and its completely closed minded to ignore one completely.
    http://www.loosechange911.com/

  44. wake up people! June 28th, 2006 6:40 PM

    shelley is obviously insane how could a person so stupid? Republicans like Shelley need to OPEN THEIR EYES and take a look around. Do you honestly think God would approve of invading another country??? I’m sure God is very pleased that Americans are destroying what he created. You republicans are so hypocritical!

Leave a reply






Shelley The Republican : For God, America and George W. Bush